Readit News logoReadit News
thisisthenewme · 5 days ago
I guess it's pretty much impossible to stop these companies from gathering data, there's too much money in it, it's too easy to implement, and there's no cohesive force to stop them. I'm wondering whether a crowdfunded effort to feed fake data into these systems would work so we overwhelm them and make their plans a bit more difficult.
mc3301 · 5 days ago
"The only winning move is not to play."

If you look at these systems that same way some people look at casinos - places specifically designed to take your money - you realize there isn't a way to change them nor improve your overall experience with them. You just don't go inside. I'm kinda hoping that it becomes the trend in the next few decades to completely abandon these algorithm-driven data-hoarding attention-stealing apps. I've been calling it "digital hygiene", personally.

banana_sandwich · 5 days ago
I used to be highly addicted to scrolling. Tiktok, reddit, instagram, everything. It nearly cost me my relationship and I swore it off ever since. I’ve been offline those apps for a few months now, and have never felt better. Cant believe what i was allowing to happen to my attention!
kibwen · 5 days ago
> I've been calling it "digital hygiene", personally.

Don't forget mental hygiene. Letting these apps have access to your brain causes legitimate brain damage in the same way smoking causes lung damage.

Deleted Comment

__MatrixMan__ · 5 days ago
They're not identical concepts, but I've been bringing up "dopamine hygiene" a lot lately and it seems to resonate with people.

Given that these companies tend to converge on addiction as their business model, I think there's a lot of overlap.

dkga · 4 days ago
If I could double upvote for the content and the reference, I would
mc3301 · 5 days ago
I said, "next few decades," but I meant to say "next few years."

Deleted Comment

bdangubic · 5 days ago
it is possible through legislation. slap them with the fine equal to their two previous years ebita combined and all this stops within an hour. of course not like people that need to pass a legislation aren’t bought for a fraction of that.

these things are why frequent comments on HN that go “this company is not using our data for training, it is in ToS etc…” makes me literally LOL.

monster_truck · 5 days ago
Please spend 5 seconds thinking about this. It isn't impossible, it isn't earnestly valuable now that gambling has taken ad fraud's throne (guess what the throne is for), and fake data doesn't work.
jonway · 5 days ago
Faking data is a good method, but has issues it seems.

Moxie tried that with GoogleSharing system back in the day.

Not really sure what the biggest downsides were, but it was discontinued.

izacus · 5 days ago
American legal system will curb stomp any tiny company on the other side of the world if they dare to draw an outline of Mickey Mouse, and you're saying that this same nation can't stop big abusive companies?
thecopy · 5 days ago
The big companies simply gives the predisent of the USA a made-up peace prize or a gold Rolex and get exempted.
renegade-otter · 4 days ago
Participating in the extraction economy is certainly a choice.

Young people complain about being worse off than their parents. Sure, the income gap has exploded, and there are many factors that are making things worse, but what exacerbates this is our complacency.

First, people are just more miserable in general because everyone on social media seems to be living the "Miata life", to quote "Workaholics".

Do you see any starter homes being built? I don't. All I see is starter mansions. Everyone thinks they are entitled to one at 26, while THEIR parents lived in a starter home until they could afford something bigger, at 45.

Secondly, and it's more to the point - spending money has never been easier. Want. Click. Get. Within hours. All this tech revenue is coming from somewhere.

What was the last time you audited your subscriptions? How much do you spend per year? If you watch two shows and a couple of movies on a streaming service, is it really worth the $240 per year? Do you listen to 12 books per year to justify the $180 Audible subscription just to break with the a la carte price? And so on. This stuff adds up. But, sure, it's CONVENIENT. These companies are counting on your laziness.

Become a responsible consumer, refuse to participate in being a product. Yes, I know, it takes effort and focus, but it's not like we do no have the power to walk away.

noman-land · 5 days ago
In the attention economy you have to vote with your attention.

Block, ignore, disengage from, and scorn any software or service that behaves this way.

Make fun of your friends when they use these apps and use peer pressure to dissuade them from using them. These services need to be uncool.

Be the change you want to see. Research alternatives. Provide alternatives. Make alternatives easier, better, and cooler.

Choose principles over convenience and encourage your peers to do the same.

newZWhoDis · 5 days ago
I'll post some inside baseball:

Almost everyone in ecom is running every ad network integration they can, no matter the source of traffic.

So if you click a Facebook ad, load a website, enter your information/checkout ALL of your information goes to every other network they integrate with.

You might never use TikTok, you might have every Facebook domain blacklisted, but when you clicked on a Google search "result" (ad) and checked out everything about your order was sent to meta/tiktok/applovin/400 other "networks" via S2S APIs.

Until this is made illegal, the incentive structure will ALWAYS push marketing departments to do this.

stefan_ · 5 days ago
It is made illegal. As the post notes, you need to (1) give notice and (2) data collected needs to be made available in a user access request and (3) deleted irrevocably on request. You must have a legitimate reason to process and store this data (scattershot forwarding to everyone is a prima facie violation). Unless you comply with all of these, you are in violation.
MrFots · 5 days ago
I'm already low-consumption, but my personal boycott of any site using shopify, which straight up has all integrations in their js you can inspect, has lowered my consumption even further. I've been emailing stores asking them to switch to bigcommerce, or whatever, and stop sharing their customers' data. Never get answers, though I never expect any.
fortzi · 5 days ago
Switching over to another ecommerce provider is a massive undertaking. It’s like if someone asked you to move your residence because the smoke from your bbq hurts their lungs
tkel · 5 days ago
Pretty sure TikTok and Instagram are sharing data somehow as well. My feeds are near identical.
slg · 5 days ago
I don't know, maybe they are colluding, but it is funny to default to that assumption over both platforms just delivering you the same content because you have the same behavior across both apps.
tkel · 5 days ago
Notably, this started happening the day that I made my TikTok account public. My Instagram feed began to be a copy of my TikTok feed. The exact same videos. Even after changing my Tiktok back to private and deleting all of my followers, the feeds are still identical, every single day. My behavior is not. On Instagram, I follow and interact with very different accounts than on TikTok. It seems to me that Instagram is buying or accessing TikTok's data, and it is not through advertising providers, because the identical content is coming directly from Instagram/TikTok and not promoted ads.
ehnto · 5 days ago
They don't have to collude, the third party advertisers that collate and provide shadow profiles do that work for them.
yibg · 5 days ago
Not sure if they're explicitly sharing data, but there does seem to be something that's sharing data across the platforms. When I buy something from Tiktok, the ads for the same thing shows up on my instagram almost instantly. Doesn't necessarily mean they're directly sharing data of course, could be a third party too. But as a consumer that has very little difference for me.
witnesprotect67 · 5 days ago
Not so laughable after working in big tech
gruez · 5 days ago
Why would two competing apps share data with each other?
bflesch · 5 days ago
Facebook has a track record of abusing security vulnerabilities to snoop up information about other apps installed on your phone. It might be as simple as Instagram reading leftover temp files created by the TikTok app.
tkel · 5 days ago
If two profit-seeking organizations can profit more from collaborating, why wouldn't they? Increasing profit is not zero-sum.
ajdude · 5 days ago
Earlier this year I downloaded TikTok once, I needed to access some very niche videos and couldn't watch them without getting an account. I never added anybody, and I never associated with any other socials, but somehow I started getting emails from TikTok that one of my NEIGHBORS were viewing my profile! Even used their full name. I deleted the account and uninstalled the app.
randycupertino · 5 days ago
I had a creepy one like this happen to me with Linkedin. I sold my uncle's guitar on craigslist using a throwaway gmail address to a guy with a very unique, rhyming name that I would never forget (ie - Gerald Herald). Immediately after he left with the guitar linkedin suggests I add him to my professional network. I never logged in to linkedin from that gmail, never looked this guy up, don't have linkedin app installed on my phone, literally met him for 60 seconds to get cash and hand over a guitar. It still weirds me out.
pests · 5 days ago
Did you both have location on? Were you both connected to the same wifi?

Did he do any research on you beforehand?

Did you and him both search the same guitar model, in the same days, while in the same area?

sweca · 5 days ago
This is because when you click a shared TikTok link, your account and the sharer's accounts are associated in a social graph. The sharer will see your account as a suggested friend and vice versa.
oefrha · 5 days ago
No sharing link needed. Before I deleted my Facebook account more than a decade ago, it was already suggesting random people I met once IRL and are at least two hops away in terms of existing FB relationships. I had very few friends (~20 IIRC).
noman-land · 5 days ago
yt-dlp will allow you to download individual videos and even entire channels.
RandallBrown · 5 days ago
TikTok knows where you are and where they are. Easy connection to make.
wkat4242 · 5 days ago
Do you have to share your location with it? I don't use it but similar apps like Instagram don't have my location permission.
hapticmonkey · 5 days ago
I uninstalled it after about half an hour of use when it became clear the app kept pushing me to watch videos with Andrew Tate (with him on the top half of the screen and random racing games on the bottom half). It’s dystopian.
Legend2440 · 5 days ago
> TikTok was only able to receive this information with the help of the Israeli data company AppsFlyer and Grindr itself.

So basically, the TikTok app is not spying on your dating apps - your dating apps are willingly selling your information to them, through intermediaries.

This means uninstalling tiktok won’t help. And worse, many other companies are getting your dating info too.

Animats · 5 days ago
Grindr had a big data "leak" in 2024.[1] Not a "leak", really, just ordinary reselling of people's gay and HIV status. In 2025, a data broker who resold Grindr data also had a big breach. That wasn't Grindr-specific - it included Temple Run, Subway Surfers, Tinder, Grindr, MyFitnessPal, Candy Crush, Truecaller, 9GAG, Microsoft 365, and others. But not TikTok, because TikTok monetizes that info themselves.

[1] https://thehill.com/business/4614940-grindr-sold-hiv-status-...

[2] https://www.pcmag.com/news/major-data-broker-leak-might-have...

ptrl600 · 5 days ago
I wonder if that "fake permissions" Android sandboxing thing from like a decade ago still works.

The right to lie to apps should be part of the new tech Magna Carta

mac-attack · 5 days ago
I hate to sound like a those pesky Kagi supporters, but that is built into Graphene OS.
gruez · 5 days ago
It's not, though. If you deny location permissions the app will still know and pester you to enable. Same with other sensitive permissions with the exception of internet.
cheschire · 5 days ago
OptionOfT · 5 days ago
Pi-Hole only works when the tracking / ad scripts are hosted from different domains than the actual content.
cheschire · 5 days ago
Don't worry, when you blackhole the entire tiktok domain, you'll still be able to use grindr.

Or did you still want to be able to view tiktok?

Sorry. Can't help you there. Or can I? https://www.torproject.org/download/ or https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/proton-vpn-fast-sec...

advisedwang · 5 days ago
People deserve privacy even if they aren't tech savvy enough to use pi-hole, even when they aren't on a network they control, even if they don't know their privacy is under attack.
tkel · 5 days ago
Highly recommend people check out this simple alternative. It's like a better, modern dnsmasq.

https://github.com/AdguardTeam/dnsproxy

cheschire · 5 days ago
Setting up a whole-home adblocking solution takes a few minutes with pi hole, and it's got a very functional web interface for actions such as unblocking specific sites for specific systems on your network.

That dns proxy looks intriguing but looks like quite a bit different from the simplicity of pi hole.

Vpsteroski · 5 days ago
Companies always track data and major social media companies and online search engines ALWAYS keep track of user search history. That data is often sold or used to find out what you are searching about and what brands you like. I guess it IS impossible to stop these big brands :-)