Readit NewsOne question for you since your worked at SpaceX. Starship v4 is supposed to be able to bring 200 metric tons to LEO vs 35 metric tons for v2. Do you have any guesses on the finally amount that New Glenn will be able to bring up when it reaches its version/block 4?
*In fully reusable first AND second stage configuration.
An expendable starship would double the tonnage.
This month, the practice was called out (https://www.help.senate.gov/rep/newsroom/press/chair-cassidy...) so the Overton window may be opening.
The AMA (a nonprofit!) clears ~$300M/year revenue from the codes, which is the direct cost passed through to consumers, but the indirect costs are the byzantine nightmare of OP.
The white coats are far from blameless here.
The costs, performance overhead, and complexity of a modern AWS deployment are insane and so out of line with what most companies should be taking on. But hype + microservices + sunk cost, and here we are.
If I start a new chat it works.
I'm a Plus subscriber and didn't hit rate limits.
This video gen tool will probably be even more useless.
It'll all be rather funny in retrospect.
Your statement is misleading. No one is using btrfs on servers. Debian and Ubuntu use ext4 by default. RHEL removed support for btrfs long ago, and it's not coming back:
> Red Hat will not be moving Btrfs to a fully supported feature. It was fully removed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.
Dead Comment
This reads as if overall performance was an afterthought and this doesn’t seem practical; it should be a business metric, it is important to the users after all.
Then again, it’s easy to comment like this in hindsight. We’ll see what happens long term.
Plus, despite marketing begging for the WYSIWYG interface they actually weren't creative enough to generate new content at a pace that required it.
We massively increased conversion rates by going full native and having 1 Engineer churn out parts kits/kitbash LPs from said kits.
Scale for reference: ~$10M/month
A space race.