Readit News logoReadit News
Posted by u/gillytech 6 months ago
Ask HN: Is anyone still using Dreamweaver?
When I was learning to build websites in 2010 Dreamweaver was the go-to. I remember it thoroughly confused the heck out of me. Anyone here able to use it effectively?
neom · 6 months ago
I do!!!!!! I love dreamwaver even today, I'm surprised people don't use it, they have done an amazing job keeping it up to date - it's honestly a joy to use. Granted: I'm not a real dev/swe, just a dude who likes to mess around with webtech, still, I think "real devs" would enjoy it too, it's great to use.

I learn web on dreamweaver, I would make something on the front end WYSIWYG editor, and then "turn it around" (I called it in my head) and look at the "back of it" (I was a kid) - anyway, tables and frames and dhtml baby!!!!

Also: https://s.h4x.club/nOu445qL :) :)

don-code · 6 months ago
I did the same, except with Netscape Composer. That was a time where the output of the WYSIWYG editor - really, the source of any page - was pretty digestible, even to me as a middle school student.

I've noticed recently that the JavaScript debugger in Firefox can "un-Webpack" (and in some cases un-minify, if I've read the inputs and outputs correctly) the code behind many sites. It's certainly not as approachable as declarative HTML, but I suspect to some enterprising person, that route is still open.

trinix912 · 6 months ago
I think it was Microsoft FrontPage that had the most undigestible output at the time. A mess of tables, inline styles, Internet Explorer-specific tricks, plus a reliance on FrontPage Server Extensions for full functionality.

Adobe still had GoLive at the time, which was basically what Dreamweaver is now, and it didn't mangle the output as much, neither did Netscape Composer (which was way more limited). Many of the simpler WYSIWYG editors (Netscape Composer, that thing AOL had, etc.) were not nearly as bad as FrontPage.

ambentzen · 6 months ago
> I've noticed recently that the JavaScript debugger in Firefox can "un-Webpack" (and in some cases un-minify, if I've read the inputs and outputs correctly) the code behind many sites. It's certainly not as approachable as declarative HTML, but I suspect to some enterprising person, that route is still open.

That's just sourcemaps I think. Pretty standard stuff, but the site have to provide the maps.

UncleSlacky · 6 months ago
Composer survives to this day as part of the Seamonkey suite. I still use it for nice, simple static sites: https://www.seamonkey-project.org/doc/features
soulofmischief · 6 months ago
Code cannot be unminified, minification is a non-reversible process. You're definitely just running into sites with source maps.
agumonkey · 6 months ago
heh, late 90s war3z was larger than I thought.

ps: Kevin Lynch got a nice career now https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Lynch_(computing)

wes-k · 6 months ago
DHTML! Gosh just hearing that term takes me back. I think AJAX killed DHTML. I'm not sure what killed AJAX. Async/await? React?
greggsy · 6 months ago
Reverse engineering is a great way to learn.

Even better than steroids by step sometimes.

reaperman · 6 months ago
“Steroids by step”?
Fire-Dragon-DoL · 6 months ago
Isn't the rendering engine of the html+css+js still innaccurate?

Deleted Comment

snowwrestler · 6 months ago
I had to read the question twice. Dreamweaver was the go-to in 2010? I think it was already well on its decline by then.

At a new job in 2003 one of my first tasks was to generate new “heat map” code since the company was updating the background image file for 50-state map interfaces. Dreamweaver had the best interface for doing that work, so I got a copy and spent a couple days carefully tracing the 50 state outlines (which Dreamweaver turned into geometric shape code).

But even then, most of our sites were running on a database-backed CMS. By 2010 we were building sites in Drupal, Wordpress, and Joomla.

I knew folks still maintaining sites with Dreamweaver templates at that time, but they were all legacy sites in academic and government jobs. Most of those types of orgs at the time still thought a website was something you built once and used for decades, like a building.

rchaud · 6 months ago
That depends on how people remember "decline". Blackberry was thought to be dead in 2009, 2 years after the iPhone, but that year BB sold more devices than ever.

For a long time, "UI design" was done in Adobe Photoshop, so using Adobe Dreamweaver to build out the final product and upload to SFTP was a perfectly serviceable workflow. Back then, websites were needed for a Google presence. Today you can have a business through a Facebook page, or pay to advertise on Google Maps or Yelp. Anything more complicated and you'd need a full SaaS ecommerce platform, not something that only does static HTML pages like DW.

lubujackson · 6 months ago
Funny story, I'm a SWE and my wife used to work as a marketing manager. Her boss wanted her to make something similar, a heat map over a U.S. map. Except he wanted it to work in Excel. She asked me about it and I told her I could code something like that, but no way inside Excel...

Sure enough, she hacked on it for a while and was able to actually build a functioning heat map in Excel. I have no idea how it works. I've been a dev for 20+ years and that remains one of the more voodoo tech things I've seen!

snowwrestler · 6 months ago
In one of the most consequential hacks ever, the Chinese broke into RSA in order to then access Lockheed Martin and steal classified info.

They did it by embedding an Adobe Flash object in one cell of an Excel file, which self-executed when the Excel file was opened. Desktop Excel is insane.

becquerel · 6 months ago
Excel is not merely Turing-complete, but a step above, able to achieve dark things best left unsaid.
anakaine · 6 months ago
Set default zoom on the sheet to very small and map out states by cells - treat them like pixels.

So much yuck.

cluckindan · 6 months ago
Excel has a store with many types of choropleth charts for free. Takes literally two minutes to make a US heatmap.
pentagrama · 6 months ago
My first websites around 98 I landed on something more obscure to build them I think, Net Objects Fusion. Later switched to (Macromedia) Dreamweaver.
justinkramp · 6 months ago
Built an e-commerce site in 1998 using net objects fusion. Had no idea what I was doing but it helped me learn quickly.
dasil003 · 6 months ago
Yeah I used it at my first job in 2000 which was essentially a webmaster job my local college. But 2001 we were already moving away from it as we started to embed PHP here and there, and eventually start building full-blown apps inline into the website (replacing poorly integrated ColdFusion stuff developed in isolation by some other department back in the 90s).
jamesgreenleaf · 6 months ago
People keep telling me to use Dreamweaver but I stick with what works: FrontPage 98
smitelli · 6 months ago
Microsoft Word's "Save as Web Page" or GTFO.
amlib · 6 months ago
Using view source in IE to discover how certain layouts and effects were done and trying to replicate it on Notepad... and then downloading Dreamweaver because you were a n00b and needed that WYSIWYG goodness.
trinix912 · 6 months ago
That's ironically still the easiest way to go for HTML emails as the output is almost guaranteed to display well across various email clients that don't implement CSS properly (Outlook).
apocalyptic0n3 · 6 months ago
I think you mean saving a PSD in Photoshop, opening it in ImageReady, slicing it, and then optimizing the slices for web.
kxrm · 6 months ago
FrontPage Express was what I used to build my first website. (personal project with friends) I learned so much about HTML simply because of the limitations in FrontPage Express.
viccis · 6 months ago
Same. I built a rockin Pokemon website with it when I was 9.
Nition · 6 months ago
Remember that grey default background colour? It was everywhere for a while.
cr125rider · 6 months ago
I was a kid the last time I touched front page. Why did my simple site need front page extensions on the server? It was basically a static site. Finding a free web host with those extensions was near impossible.
geocar · 6 months ago
> Why did my simple site need front page extensions on the server?

Frontpage could do FTP under ideal conditions.

> Finding a free web host with those extensions was near impossible.

Once upon a time I made a cgi version of the fpse protocol because Windows was so expensive to run, so it's a shame you didn't find it. The internet was smaller back then, but maybe not as small as I remember.

I implemented a few "webbot"s as cgi scripts instead of activex controls (like counter and search and even the 'Visual InterDev Navigation Bar' if you remember that). Dreamweaver never had anything like that - and cold fusion really was a bit further than most of my customers could handle on their own.

    <html>
    
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
    content="text/html; charset=iso-18859-1
    <title FrontPage Configuration Information </title>
    </head>
    
    <body>
    <!-- _vti_inf.html version 0.100>
    <!--
     This file contains important information used by the FrontPage client
     (the FrontPage Explorer and FrontPage Editor) to communicate with the
     FrontPage server extensions installed on this web server.
    
     The values below are automatically set by FrontPage at installation.
     Normally, you do not need to modify these values, but in case
     you do, the parameters are as follows:
    
     'FPShtmlScriptUrl', 'FPAuthorScriptUrl', and 'FPAdminScriptUrl' specify
     the relative urls for the scripts that FrontPage uses for remote
     authoring.  These values should not be changed.
     'FPVersion' identifies the version of the FrontPage Server Extentions
     installed, and should not be changed.
    --><!-- FrontPage Configuration Information
     FPVersion="4.0.2.2717"
     FPShtmlScriptUrl="_vti_bin/shtml.exe/_vti_rpc"
     FPAuthorScriptUrl="_vti_bin/_vti_aut/author.exe"
     FPAdminScriptUrl="_vti_bin/_vti_adm/admin.exe"
    -->
    <p><!--webbot bot="PurpleText"
    preview="This page is placed into the root directory of your FrontPage web when FrontPage is installed. It contains information used by the FrontPage client to communicate with the FrontPage server extentions installed on this web server. You should not delete this file."
    --></p>
    
    <h1>FrontPage Configuration Information</h1>
    
    <p>In the HTML comments, this page contains configuration information
    that the FrontPage Explorer and FrontPage Editor need to communicate with
    the FrontPage server extentions installed on this web server. In short,
    do not delete this page.</p>
    </body>
    </html>

InsideOutSanta · 6 months ago
That's nothing, you’ll have to pry my Mac with System 8 and GoLive CyberStudio (winner of most 90s application name) from my cold, dead hands.
jszymborski · 6 months ago
Anyone ever use Homestead around that era?
aqueueaqueue · 6 months ago
That's OK but Netscape Composer let's you edit an existing page on the web.
kurthr · 6 months ago
Oh man, I'm gonna have to upgrade my AOLPress from 1.2.2 to 2.0!
Terretta · 6 months ago
Kids these days. The last good vintage FrontPage was from Vermeer.
lelandfe · 6 months ago
Haha ok grandpa! tabs back to iWeb
zer0x4d · 6 months ago
An ode to Dreamweaver

Dreamweaver was how I learned MySQL back when I was 12-13 and got into web development. I don't remember how I came across it but somehow things, the way they were laid out at the time, made sense to me. This would ripple into a career that's making my living 16 years later.

I remember downloading XAMPP and installing it to get a local MySQL and PhpMyAdmin server. A few clicks in Dreamweaver later, I somehow had a connection file that would connect to my local MySQL server. I started playing around with it and creating different forms. The MySQL query generators on Dreamweaver were so simple that you could, with a few clicks, have a full on CRM.

I ended up coding a test score reporting system for my middle school class and the school somehow trusted me and started using it. This made me possibly the most hated person in the school because parents could now see their kids scores every day and there was no more "Oh the teacher hasn't given out the scores yet." But it was good times, and I was so excited about it.

Many years later, I now run a startup and have transitioned into using Node.js but MySQL is still my bread and butter. I still remember that day when I discovered the SELECT query.

jszymborski · 6 months ago
I loved the XAMPP logo
elviejo · 6 months ago
I like dreamweaver. But I could still code html by hand with HotDogPro.

The one that I really miss is Macromedia Fireworks.

The perfect mix between vector editor + html editor + OOP.

And to think that it did all of that in the metadata of a binary format (png).

Nothing has come close.

samwillis · 6 months ago
If you hadn't post this comment, I would have.

Fireworks could have been Figma, it could have been the default platform every designer used. But Adobe didn't understand it, they saw it as a weird Photoshop competitor and shelved it.

The last few versions bundled with CS were clearly neglected maintenance releases. I finally stopped using my slowing rotting copy in about 2014 when I got a Mac with a retina screen and fireworks was stuck with a terrible pixel doubled ui. :-(

cyode · 6 months ago
Fireworks came with the Macromedia Studio MX 2004 suite (I had the education version -- ~$299 was the happy medium for me between full price and pirating). While I made great use of Flash and Dreamweaver in that bundle, Fireworks was always an enigma. I think it exported some animated gifs for me. What did y'all make with it?
markdown · 6 months ago
I held on until 2020. At some point I had to give up MacOS updates to keep it going.

I still haven't found an acceptable replacement, choosing instead to design in-browser with CSS. Of course this means I can't make graphic heavy designs that I can slice and export with transparent PNGs, but we haven't cycled back to that sort of design yet so I'll be OK with minimalist crap for a while.

zackangelo · 6 months ago
Allaire Homesite anyone?

It was a sad day for me when it got bought and integrated into Dreamweaver.

tuzemec · 6 months ago
Homesite was amazing. I consider it the first real text editor that I've ever used. And I hated Macromedia for killing it.
ssvt · 6 months ago
Agreed! Built my first e-commerce site with Homesite and Coldfusion in 1996.
dijit · 6 months ago
fireworks is still the best 2d graphics design system I’ve ever used.

I used to make a non-insignificant amount of rasterised computer “art” using fireworks, its discontinuance (and the fact that photoshop was not at all a replacement) killed that for me.

nickthegreek · 6 months ago
HotDogPro changed my life as a kid and was a big part in my learning to code and understand the web, files and creativity.
lewdwig · 6 months ago
I think the emerging meta seems to be using LLMs that will create HTML components for you from your Figma storyboards.

And also to let another LLM create your Figma storyboards from your novel design ideas.

And asking a third LLM to give you some novel design ideas.

neither_color · 6 months ago
One prompt to generate 75% of what you want and get you excited and fill you with a sense of dread over what it means for future tech careers.

10 prompts to add a new feature.

20 prompts to add a second feature and fix everything that broke in the 1st feature while adding the second.

50 prompts to add a third feature and fix what broke in the 1st and 2nd features while adding the third.

LaGrange · 6 months ago
One for the Dark Lord on his Dark Throne,

In the damp bedroom where the doges lie,

One Prompt to rule them all, One prompt to find them,

One Prompt to bring them all and in the darkness bind them,

In the damp bedroom where the black molds lie.

Edit: don't judge me I'm not a poet.

aruggirello · 6 months ago
You forgot a fourth LLM will be the one using the site.
deadbabe · 6 months ago
And a fifth LLM created from training data scraped from the site.
canadiantim · 6 months ago
Yep this does seem to be the emerging meta.

Have you found success with some models over others?

pockybum522 · 6 months ago
I'm not sure they were being serious.
graypegg · 6 months ago
Around the same time, I was using Coda actually!

https://web.archive.org/web/20101007013748/http://panic.com/...

I had only used dreamweaver a small amount at highschool, but the imac we had at home had a Coda license on it. While I don't think I could comfortably use Dreamweaver to make something today, Coda is possibly usable. Coda 2 since came out which I never tried, and now it's a new editor called Nova, which I was using for a short while but has strayed away from the style-focused Coda 1.x.

I would like to see that class of "make your own website" desktop editors come back, that bridge the line between dreamweaver and IntelliJ. Just a few core IDE features that make it not a pain to use, and just a few GUI features to make designing easy.

paradox460 · 6 months ago
Coda was actually the first thing I ever expensed. I really quite liked that software

I keep going back to Nova to see if it will recapture that magic, but it just can't compete with vscode these days

jszymborski · 6 months ago
I always envied Coda users.
teej · 6 months ago
Now that's a name I've not heard in a long time.

Early 2000s Adobe was stacked with web technology. They knew where the world was headed, but didn't quite capture it the right way.

Flash, Shockwave, Dreamweaver, Macromedia Homesite, Fireworks, Coldfusion, Adobe AIR, LiveMotion, Actionscript 3.0, MXML, Flex.

They shipped so much software, it's incredible.

snowwrestler · 6 months ago
Macromedia is really where to point most of that admiration IMO. Most of the products you list were developed there and then Adobe bought the company.

Jeremy Allaire somehow flies under the radar as an impactful tech entrepreneur, but look at this resume: Allaire Corp, Macromedia, Brightcove, Circle.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Allaire

trinix912 · 6 months ago
What's even more interesting is when you look at some of those tools, many of them were actually way more straightforward to use to design websites without much coding than what we have today. Just like how we had all those CRUD rapid app development tools that would build the app for you just from a database model (Access, PowerBuilder, Delphi, FoxPro...). While what we have today is arguably way more powerful, we've lost some of that simplicity (at least for more trivial use cases) along the way.
virtualcharles · 6 months ago
I always felt like Adobe‘s big problem was they were fixated on trying to adapt any web technology to work for print designers, that any design should fit in a certain window size or resolution. This worked ok until mobile devices hit a certain tipping point and the idea of responsive design became king. They didn’t know how to handle that, and the tools fell way behind.