Readit News logoReadit News
jacobgkau · 2 months ago
People usually mention Evernote when Bending Spoons is brought up, but I also know them as purchasing Meetup (after it was already sort of struggling) and, more recently, entering an agreement to purchase Vimeo (of which I'm a paid user).

AOL was already a husk, and has been arguably since they got rid of the triangle logo. It was already owned by a private equity firm, Apollo Global Management, as a subsidiary of Yahoo!. Some of the still-relevant tech news sites like TechCrunch and Engadget were apparently moved from AOL to being directly under Yahoo! a few years ago. So I'm not too worried about AOL, but it's interesting how often I've heard about Bending Spoons in relation to brands I know over the past few years.

(Edit: AOL deleted all of my childhood emails back in the 2010s-- on an account that had previously been part of a paid AOL family subscription for years-- after I failed to sign into my account for more than 6 months, which also contributes to my current feeling that it's dead to me.)

BryantD · a month ago
Vimeo is the really interesting case for me, because they are the white label hosting providers for a large number of niche streaming services -- Criterion Channel comes to mind, for example. Evernote failing is sad but lower on indirect effects. Vimeo going down would leave a noticeable hole in the streaming world.
muglug · a month ago
Vimeo won’t “go down” anytime soon. It might get worse/more expensive, but it’s not in imminent danger. And it’s also not the only white-label provider around, either.
Mistletoe · a month ago
Is this why Criterion streaming quality is so poor? It’s completely unacceptable for a service that is supposed to pride itself on loving movies and preserving them. Sometimes the scene will be dark and I will descend into some sort of weird 8 bit pixel world.
darknavi · a month ago
Dropout as well I think.
jrochkind1 · 2 months ago
It sounds like Bending Spoons is where old tech products go to die? I guess that's private equity for you.
zaptheimpaler · 2 months ago
Understandably people don't like Bending Spoons - they fired the whole dev team on Evernote, and the price has gone way up too.. but as a user I have to say Evernote the product has gotten better and better since the acquisition. They've improved performance and have great new features every month.
cestith · 2 months ago
I’ve heard the same evaluation of SoftBank, IBM, and Micro Focus/OpenText/Rocket Software. There’s some truth in that, but you can still get Visual Cobol even after a number of ownership changes. https://www.rocketsoftware.com/en-us/products/cobol/visual-c...
al_borland · a month ago
Yahoo tried that business model and it didn’t go too well for them. Maybe we’ll see Bending Spoons but Tumblr and Flickr next.
sauercrowd · 2 months ago
I think the reality is most of these are already dead, and a PE firm taking over is giving them one more chance
insane_dreamer · a month ago
They bought Komoot recently.
bigbuppo · a month ago
They're the CA/Broadcom of as-a-service.
7moritz7 · a month ago
They are digital private equity essentially
dangus · 2 months ago
That seems to be the opposite of what the article suggests, they seem to hold on long-term and invest in technology improvements.
acomjean · 2 months ago
Meetup.. the promise of meetup was the organizers pay a fee so the members don’t have too.

My partner organized one a decade ago.

I’m still a member of a couple but now they’re really going after group members with ads and upsells. It still works but has become kind of icky.

Bending spoons, the name just sends up red flags as parlor trickery.

jacobgkau · a month ago
Yeah, I was a paying Meetup member for a short bit back around 2018-2019 when I hosted events with my own group, and have been a very active attendee of others' groups (but no longer an organizer of my own group) since 2020 on. I feel like the payment situation hasn't actually gotten that much worse-- the price for organizers that can be achieved with coupons is similar to what it was before, and attendees don't actually have to pay-- but they've made it feel a lot worse by making organizers dig for coupons and trying to trick attendees into thinking they need to pay.

But I think most of those changes happened before Bending Spoons bought Meetup. I don't think it was a situation where everything was great, then Bending Spoons bought them and it started going to crap (which I've heard some people in these groups retroactively claiming recently).

netsharc · a month ago
Meetup now is weird.. they hide everything behind blurs (for example people's last names), but the blurs are CSS, and one could modify the CSS and get the obscured info.

I think it also advertises "get premium to see gender ratios"...

jen729w · a month ago
> Bending spoons, the name just sends up red flags as parlor trickery.

'Spoon bender' was a deep insult in my circle when we were ~18. In honour of the ur-bender, Uri.

riffraff · a month ago
I'm pretty sure the name is after the scene in "the matrix" (there is no spoon etc).
Shared404 · 2 months ago
> Apollo Global Management

Oh hey, the company that orchestrated my first layoff!

Highly recommend Plunder (ISBN: 978-1541702103) for those who want to learn more about the enshittification these companies bring.

Deleted Comment

vjvjvjvjghv · 2 months ago
Bending Spoons are the GOAT enshittifiers. Meetup has become a mess where you constantly get popups for their premium accounts and the price changes almost every week. The site is also quite buggy
jacobgkau · a month ago
Bending Spoons bought Meetup in Janaury 2024. I recall Meetup's pricing getting crappified before that, and their website's always been a mess. So imo, we can't point to Bending Spoons as the cause of that, necessarily.

(This is a similar story to Vimeo; they've been forcing a pricing scheme update gradually over the past year, and now Bending Spoons is buying them. I'm sure some people will get the timeline mixed up since it's so close and claim that Bending Spoons raised the prices.)

bluedino · 2 months ago
I'm still using an email that is one of the AOL domains, mostly for accessing legacy sites that were around at that time.

I lost access to it during an iPhone upgrade, I paid $12.95 or something for a 'premium' membership that allowed me to have the password reset by a REAL LIVE PERSON.

suzzer99 · a month ago
I think my mom spends several hours a week talking to a live person at Compuserve because she lost her password or various other reasons. They don't seem to be under any time pressure and are happy to chat with her as long as she wants.
kyleee · a month ago
Better price than better help. Probably better than better help’s counseling, too
logifail · 2 months ago
> I'm still using an email that is one of the AOL domains

ProTip: Honestly, just buy your own domain, control your own email address(es)...

mlyle · 2 months ago
> > mostly for accessing legacy sites that were around at that time.
skrebbel · 2 months ago
Wow way to miss the point

Dead Comment

nostrademons · 2 months ago
Far cry from the AOL - Time Warner merger, where AOL purchased Time Warner for $183B, creating a company with a combined $350B market cap.
jandrese · 2 months ago
Yes, there is much less money to set on fire this time.
ryandrake · 2 months ago
There are plenty of other companies setting much more money on fire these days. The money furnace business model is as healthy as ever.
alberth · 2 months ago
At one time, AOL had a market cap of $200B

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/08/15/how-aol-dominated-the-intern...

bdcravens · 2 months ago
When Verizon sold it and Yahoo, they were sold for less than 2% of their peak market cap

https://www.axios.com/2021/05/04/verizon-aol-yahoo-valuation...

ec109685 · 2 months ago
That is a silly comparison. The alibaba assets of Yahoo were carved out before it was sold to Verizon was worth $58.62B.
everfrustrated · 2 months ago
We'll probably be saying the same about a lot of AI companies as well....
dylan604 · 2 months ago
at the end of the last tech bubble, Herman Miller chairs were available for cheap. wonder what the score from the ashes will come this round?
ascagnel_ · 2 months ago
I always look at the AOLTimeWarner merger as the thing that broke them, distracting them at the moment they should've been prepping to roll out broadband. I also look at that merger through the lens of "don't fight a land war in Asia" in terms of breaking empires -- "don't let your company acquire Warner Bros.".
JustExAWS · 2 months ago
AOL did exactly the right thing. They knew their stock was overvalued and did some shady accounting to prop their stock up until the acquisition and it immediately crashed.

How could they “get into broadband”? They weren’t going to be able to create the last mile infrastructure. We see how that worked out for Google.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2019/02/googl...

bsimpson · 2 months ago
At the turn of the millennium, they were valuable enough to buy Warner Bros.
neom · 2 months ago
pavel_lishin · 2 months ago
> In November 2022, Bending Spoons agreed to acquire Evernote.[19] The acquisition was concluded in January 2023.[20] In July 2023, Evernote laid off all of its existing staff and announced it would relocate to Europe to be closer to Bending Spoons' headquarters.[21]

Damn.

xp84 · 2 months ago
This is exactly how European companies do when they acquire American ones, especially "Tech" companies that have well-paid technical staff. You can hire in Eastern Europe for far less, and can hire in Western Europe for still a significant bargain compared to what engineers and associated people make in California - plus, dealing with an 8+ hour time difference is brutal compared to keeping it all in Europe.

A friend I know is going through such an acquisition, funny thing is it's a European company acquiring his, but owned by an American PE firm. The American PE firm knows that cutting-edge tech is developed by expensive engineers on the West Coast, but when it's time to milk a more mature company for cash flow, you want cheaper European staff.

marstall · 2 months ago
How does that possibly work? How do they continue with zero of the staff?
dancc · 2 months ago
Someone wrote about Bending Spoons' history and playbook:

https://www.colinkeeley.com/blog/bending-spoons-operating-ma...

I enjoyed this part:

No On-Call Rotations: Bending Spoons aims to build systems so reliable that they eliminate the need for on-call rotations. This is unusual in the tech industry, where on-call duties are standard to promptly address system issues.

For most of their products, they have no on-call schemes at all. Engineers are encouraged to think through all corner cases to ensure robustness, knowing there is no fallback like an on-call team.

hamdingers · a month ago
Seems reasonable if they're putting most of their acquisitions into maintenance mode. In my experience the vast majority of outages are caused by bad deploys of new code or configuration.
everfrustrated · 2 months ago
I wonder if that's got lost in translation somewhere. I can understand not having on-call operations teams (an anti-pattern) but not having anyone on call at any time seems unlikely. Unless they mean to say its part of all devs job expectations and not a paid extra.
Copenjin · a month ago
Is anyone surprised that you can build stuff that require no support for years? I do, know people that do. Thinking about robustness is the default path.
kbar13 · 2 months ago
holy smokes this is worse for consumers and employees than being bought by PE
qingcharles · 2 months ago
I'm still waiting to see how they complete destroy Vimeo they just bought.
croisillon · 2 months ago
oh wow and they got Vimeo and WeTransfer too!?
dotcoma · 2 months ago
And Komoot and Meetup, and of course Evernote.
JohnClark1337 · 2 months ago
So companies go there to die
jimnotgym · a month ago
Another way to look at it: When a companies bubble bursts, when people realise that it is just a note taking app (or whatever), and that its never going to grow 10x again, VC investors want shot of it.

Without a constant stream of new investment, the company simply can't afford to be loaded up with SV staff producing features that nobody will pay for. Bending Spoons change the business model to 'normal business'. They move to much cheaper European staff, stop work on nonsense 'features', concentrate instead on servicing their existing customers with a stable platform and well thought out incremental advances.

So they take businesses that are dying because nobody will give them free money any more, and make them into real sustainable businesses that can stand on their own two feet?

A_Duck · 2 months ago
And clearly they're hard at work whitewashing that page... check the Talk Page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bending_Spoons
internetter · 2 months ago
Bending Spoons is correctly following the [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]] process. They are pointing out information which could be improved and are requesting an independent party confirm they are correct. They disclosed their conflict. All companies are allowed and encouraged to do this. Not many do.

Source: I'm a wikipedia editor unaffiliated with bending spoons.

Edit: I see another complaint about IP editing. I am looking into this.

cyrialize · a month ago
My wife's grandparents use and pay for AOL. I think they pay for a premium package? All I know is that it handles their internet, web browsing, and email.

One day they had issues setting it up, so they call a help line. They ended up being scammed, and paid this person ~$200 to fix their issue. After it happened, they immediately called me up and asked if they were scammed.

I told them that unfortunately, they were. Surprisingly though, the scammer did actually fix their issue.

x187463 · a month ago
Are you using the word scam to describe AOL overcharging for helpdesk service or was the helpdesk not affiliated with AOL and they just happened to know how to fix the problem (or maybe they caused it?)?
cyrialize · a month ago
My apologies, I should've been clear!

AOL doesn't charge for any helpdesk service at all. It explicitly says on their website that all helpdesk services are free and they'll never charge you.

The scam was that the scammers had a fake helpdesk service that showed up that my wife's grandparents ended up paying for.

The scammers did actually fix the issue, but the scam was that the grandparents should have never been charged!

Thorrez · a month ago
Was it really a scam then? Or just extremely overpriced?
cyrialize · a month ago
My apologies, I should've been more clear!

The scam was that this service is actually free provided by AOL. The grandparents shouldn't have ever been charged, they just ended up finding scammers that actually knew how to fix the issue.

jjice · 2 months ago
I don't know much about Bending Spoons, but I associate them with Evernote now. Not sure if Evernote's downfall is associated with them or predates them.

I never used Evernote, that's just what I hear. From what I've seen over the years, people don't like the way the product has moved and they really don't like the frequent price increases for not product change.

avrionov · 2 months ago
Evernote was in decline in more than 5 years before their sale to Bending Spoons. The sale didn't improve anything, because Bending Spoons act as private equity. They layoffs, moving the job to cheaper locations and increasing the prices.
4ndrewl · 2 months ago
Someone's got to cover the costs of all those non-paying users.

20 years from Bending Spoons will be the final resting place of Anthropic.

ekjhgkejhgk · 2 months ago
For all the shit that PE gets, what you described is probably the best outcome possible from the POV of shareholders. If done well it should increase earnings per share. It's perhaps the best you can hope for in a situation where the company has been in decline for 5 years and you have no levers to effect change as a small shareholder.

This only works profitably because the users let themselves be stepped on, of course. But then again users who put their notes into a remote company's computer are those kind of people.

DHPersonal · 2 months ago
Bending Spoons has taken at least one of the apps I’ve used and stuffed them full of subscription models in a pretty blatant attempt to wring as much money out of the existing user base before the app becomes obsolete.
bonzini · a month ago
It's quite likely that the app was bleeding money before. Whether they're wringing money or being responsible with their finances I can't tell, but consider that the alternative could have been no app at all.
JSR_FDED · a month ago
Evernote sucked by that time. Their user-driven support forums were so obviously a ploy to string along users while nothing changed. As a dev it was glaringly obvious to me they were milking not investing. Moving to Apple Notes was the simplest and best decision.

Deleted Comment