Readit News logoReadit News
dankwizard · 2 months ago
It was falling behind. The dodgy stores were getting more creative and Fakespot needed to play catch up.

You've got stores that would include a $5-$20 coupon/gift card in the item in exchange for a positive review. Sure, this didn't 1:1 translate but if a user did it would look like a legitimate review.

You've got a plethora of LLMs out there just itching to GENERATE.

Then an expensive option I was suprised happened - I bought a Dyson clone vacuum cleaner off of Amazon. A few weeks later, the company emailed me and said 'We have a new model. Buy that one, leave a review, we'll refund the purchase'. So I did it. This happened about 10 more times in 2024. My outdoor shed is entirely stick vacuums.

Feel a bit dirty doing it but that's ok I've got 12 vacuums that can clean my conscience.

I think Fakespot would have difficulty with all 3 of these scenarios.

dawnerd · 2 months ago
Some company paid be 100 bucks to change my review to be positive so they sent the money via PayPal no problem then I changed the review to say they paid me to write a glowing review and of course Amazon ended up removing the review for being harmful to their customers
colonial · 2 months ago
Amazon is awful when it comes to striking down accusatory customer reviews.

Last year I (like a fool) purchased some chunky thru-hole MOSFETs on Amazon. Lo and behold, despite the datasheets promising a few amps with 3.3V at the gate, I only got a few milliamps. Obviously counterfeit - but no matter how hard I tried or how much indirection I employed, Amazon always took down my review warning others of this verifiable fact.

pergadad · 2 months ago
Much more, Amazon also loves to remove all reviews that mention that the product is counterfeit. Several times I did receive clear counterfeit goods via Amazon, but there is no way to warn others as these reviews are blocked.
cyberlurker · 2 months ago
I bought a light fixture that had a design flaw that turned it into a fire hazard. I contacted Amazon and provided proof, hoping they’d take the product down and prevent harm to others. They did initially but within a few days the same exact item with matching SKU and photos was listed.

I have an entire category of items I will never buy from Amazon. They don’t look out for customers ahead of time, only on the backend when you complain.

neilv · 2 months ago
I had one do something that presented a different angle for a complaint...

Some Amazon seller included some US postage stamps as a gift, along with a glossy full-color printed offer to pay me cash or more stamps for a positive review.

So I took the stamps to a post office, some kind of manager looked at them, said they'd almost guarantee that the stamps were counterfeit. So I left the stamps and the glossy offer (with the sellers's contact info) with them, to refer higher up to some kind of investigation.

I'd guess probably it will only lead back to some overseas seller who is untraceable, and who just pops back up under 10 new different names. But maybe someday Amazon will be under some kind of KYC-like obligation, to only permit sellers and other supply chain that can be held accountable for illegal/counterfeit/dangerous/stolen/etc. products.

varispeed · 2 months ago
Some company said they know where I live and they will pay me a visit if I don't remove the bad review (product was dangerous). That was on Amazon.
hydrogen7800 · 2 months ago
So they _can_ do something about fake reviews.
hopelite · 2 months ago
That must explain why I’ve seen bad reviews that have 5 stars. I guess the review itself really does not matter as much as long as the stupid starts are there.

It also reminds me of one of the biggest apartment complex management companies, Graystar using a similar method by bribing applicants with $500 off the security deposit for a 5 star review on Google maps.

rsync · 2 months ago
Thank you for sharing that anecdote… just terrible behavior on Amazons part.
4b11b4 · 2 months ago
wow, full circle.. and just.. what to even do with that
whoopdedo · 2 months ago
The obvious implication being who Amazon considers to be their "customer". Hint, it's not you.
Retr0id · 2 months ago
I can understand going for the "free upgrade" the first time around, but why continue racking up more vacuum cleaners after that? Do you plan to sell them later?
lt_kernelpanic · 2 months ago
Obviously, the plan is to eventually collect enough to construct a Dyson sphere.
dankwizard · 2 months ago
You sound like my wife. I don't know. I grew up kind of poor and my mindset still has a "If I can get an item typically worth $100-200 for free, TAKE IT".

The plan was to flip them on FB market place but I've just hoarded them.

Mtinie · 2 months ago
It’s the rational option if someone is giving you something for less than it costs you and the moral implications of the action is minimal (at best).
BeFlatXIII · 2 months ago
Christmas gifts for the whole family.
michaelbuckbee · 2 months ago
Stocking up to give them out at Christmas?
triceratops · 2 months ago
> why continue racking up more vacuum cleaners after that?

This guy took bribes to leave fake reviews. He obviously sucks. /s

timcobb · 2 months ago
> I've got 12 vacuums that can clean my conscience.

Why would you want 12 vacuums? What are you going to do with them? Isn't that a senseless amount of redundant objects to horde? Don't you want room for other things in your shed?

AlienRobot · 2 months ago
>Don't you want room for other things in your shed?

To be fair, it's vacuum so it doesn't occupy space.

Dead Comment

thoroughburro · 2 months ago
> Feel a bit dirty doing it but that's ok I've got 12 vacuums that can clean my conscience.

All it takes to lose civilisation is for everyone to think as selfishly as this.

spicyusername · 2 months ago
Nah, civilizations been running on this attitude since it's inception, and here we are.

There's never been a magical golden age where people were any different than they are.

Deleted Comment

bsdz · 2 months ago
I'm struggling to believe you have a dozen new vacuum cleaners in your shed. It's quite an extraordinary claim. Are you willing to share some evidence?
dankwizard · 2 months ago
Sure. It's cold, rainy, and midnight but here's what came up in my email when searching "vacuum". It's not all, and you can see some I didn't reply to but -

https://imgur.com/a/F0u9xVM

latexr · 2 months ago
> Feel a bit dirty doing it but that's ok I've got 12 vacuums that can clean my conscience.

Thank you for the laugh.

But why keep them all? Why not give some away to friends or neighbours, or even sell them?

sokoloff · 2 months ago
I always wondered why Amazon would show me ads for vacuums after I just bought a vacuum from them.

This sheds (no pun intended) some light on why they think there are avid vacuum collectors.

bluedino · 2 months ago
> You've got stores that would include a $5-$20 coupon/gift card in the item in exchange for a positive review.

I had a tool manufacturer read a bad review on one of the big box home improvement stores in the US, they contacted me within a day (the store must have gave them my email address?) and offered to send me my choice of replacement tool, for free, in exchange for taking my review down.

Helps me learn which companies not to trust.

p3rls · 2 months ago
Oooh, I had the same deal but with cameras... Maybe they should pivot into a site showing deals w/ scammers.
theshackleford · 2 months ago
> You've got stores that would include a $5-$20 coupon/gift card in the item in exchange for a positive review.

It doesnt even need to be that complicated. I worked reputation management for an ecommerce place for a while a few years back. I literally asked very politely against a random sampling of all orders if they would consider leaving us a review, and significantly more actually did than I would ever have expected, with no reward or value in it for them doing so.

I got 100s of reviews this way in the span of a month or two. Enough on a geographically important centralised reviews location to raise the average rating signficantly.

gwd · 2 months ago
> I literally asked very politely against a random sampling of all orders if they would consider leaving us a review

Uh, this is how it's supposed to work? Make a good product, get good reviews for free.

"Make a crappy / mediocre product and pay people to write good reviews" is completely different.

stronglikedan · 2 months ago
Leave honest reviews (not saying you're not) and don't feel dirty. You'd actually be helping.
dankwizard · 2 months ago
They were mostly honest - I just always included something like 'an upgrade from my last one' but these clones are all so similar and all effective. Can do the whole house on a single charge, strong enough, has the low projecting light to highlight dust, high number of attachments.

Does the job. I'm no vacuum connoisseur (Which you think I'd be after all of these) but none were scammy products.

dfxm12 · 2 months ago
Can I have a vacuum?
rightbyte · 2 months ago
Why did they choose you for vacuum pimp? You got high "consumer rating" or something?

Deleted Comment

chrischen · 2 months ago
When you have extremely generous return policies then reviews matter less. They are still relevant if your'e trying to optimize for buy once for life, but in that case you should just be going for established brands instead, where their reputation is their review.
dns_snek · 2 months ago
They don't build them like they used to, in my experience most consumer electronics/appliance brands that are still considered high quality are just coasting on the reputation they built up in the 70s, 80s and 90s. In many categories it's getting almost impossible to find products that aren't just generic whitelabeled junk resold by "established brands".
solardev · 2 months ago
Brands don't mean much when they're constantly bought up by other companies and then used to whitewash poorer quality products.
veunes · 2 months ago
It's one thing to detect fake language patterns; it's another when the review is technically real but incentivized into dishonesty
alpineman · 2 months ago
Horrible for the environment
kouru225 · 2 months ago
… Wanna send me a vacuum?
4b11b4 · 2 months ago
Wait what. You have 12 vacs?

anyway, I can imagine some small territory in time where fakespot can accurately deal with the flood. But then..

dankwizard · 2 months ago
Yes.

I had to leave a video review component (No face). I wonder if any shoppers ever wondered why the same monotone man was constantly buying and reviewing vaccuum cleaners if he's always leaving positive reviews?!

Dead Comment

throwaway843 · 2 months ago
Dyson always struck me as scammy. All the way back to the 19990s. More proof.
defrost · 2 months ago
Because fake Dyson clones exist?
bentcorner · 2 months ago
> Mozilla couldn't find a sustainable business model for Fakespot despite its popularity

I don't know if it's fair for me to armchair quarterback, but still - what was their business model when they decided to do the acquisition? From the outside looking in barely did anything whatsoever.

I browse Amazon using Firefox extremely often and I don't recall seeing any helper UI pop up. Even so, what would have been their strategy to monetize me? User data? Commissions? Some kind of Mozilla+ subscription?

I love FF and cheer Mozilla on where I can, but honestly these decisions are inscrutable.

burnt-resistor · 2 months ago
Mozilla seems infected by corporate board members who probably have conflicts of interest including investments in Amazon, Google, etc.
TylerE · 2 months ago
Mozilla seems to be infected by upper management that feels a need to justify ever spiraling salaries.
IncreasePosts · 2 months ago
Mozilla wants to be the "web you can trust" brand, which involves not just shipping a browser but protecting people from the rougher sides of the internet.
zdragnar · 2 months ago
I think this is the real answer; they've got a vague mission statement, they saw something they wanted to support, opted to buy it, and in classic Mozilla fashion let it squander because the managers in charge moved on.

It's a move straight out of Google's playbook, with the glaring flaw of them not being Google, and their user base likes them for not being Google.

Honestly, Mozilla gives me gnome vibes. They're so caught up believing their own spiel that they don't understand why they keep missing the mark.

JadeNB · 2 months ago
> Mozilla wants to be the "web you can trust" brand, which involves not just shipping a browser but protecting people from the rougher sides of the internet.

And also, apparently, selling your data. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43213612, and particularly move-on's comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43213945.

bjord · 2 months ago
I don't actually think there was (or needed to be) one...keep in mind they're a non-profit. I think they just wanted to make the internet a safer place, but semi-extraneous (particularly unprofitable) projects sadly need to be cut aggressively with the rising threat of the google antitrust suit, as they may lose most of their income.
okanat · 2 months ago
Mozilla Corp is a for profit organization owned by a non-profit foundation.
account42 · 2 months ago
Why is Mozilla, supposedly a subsidiary of a nonprofit with the goal of making the internet better, looking for business models in the first place? They should be looking for donations, sponsors, government grants, etc.
4b11b4 · 2 months ago
Right, why even buy it in the first place? I can't imagine the landscape has changed much, unless the most popular comment here is all the evidence you need...
Workaccount2 · 2 months ago
They could have slid in their referral link, which would probably make them decent money, but the "ick" factor is pretty high from consumers.

I'm sure there will be a replacement though, and I'm sure they will go hard with referral links.

guappa · 2 months ago
Just make it opt in
colinbartlett · 2 months ago
I recall seeing the Mozilla Review Checker pop up on Amazon shortly after I started using it as my daily driver.

I dismissed it quickly because fake reviews is not a problem I have. Maybe I'm not the target market? I do buy a lot on Amazon but can't recall ever thinking I felt burned by fake reviews.

veunes · 2 months ago
Feels like they bought a cool tool, didn't know how to plug it into anything meaningful, and quietly sunset it when it didn’t fit the roadmap
rhcom2 · 2 months ago
Similar feelings about Pocket too. Mozilla seems to be on a cleaning spree
benchly · 2 months ago
Rather that taking yet another opportunity to dump on Mozilla (it's easy, I know), I think a better question would be who is the alternative out there doing the work that Fakespot tried to do? Is this telling us that the task is too large for any current solutions to handle?

Just relying on consumer judgement has certainly proven to be inadequate in combating fake reviews, and without incentive, we're not going to get many legitimate reviews.

drekipus · 2 months ago
I can almost assure you, the plan is to run it into the ground,
kulahan · 2 months ago
Why? Can’t imagine any realistic push for this when there’s theoretically much more money to be made by creating a product that people pay to use.
pogue · 2 months ago
I did search around looking for alternatives and the landscape isn't great. There's ReviewMeta.com which doesn't work 100% of the time and is no longer actively maintained as far as I can tell.

TheReviewIndex.com I didn't find to be very helpful, as it doesn't index all products and sometimes just refuses to check on listings you ask it to. It seems to have some kind of subscription model, but they don't list the price and offer some kind of enterprise model that doesn't sound like it has anything to do with checking reviews.

SearchBestSellers.com isn't for checking individual products, but it will show you the top sellers for each category so you can get an idea of what could be good in the category you're looking for

Camelcamelcamel.com is a price watch tool that will also show you some historical info on a product & notify you if you sign up and want to be emailed when a price drop occurs

There are a few others on AlternativeTo that weren't there the last time I checked. https://alternativeto.net/software/fakespot/

On Reddit, some people were mentioning alternatives, including asking ChatGPT about the product and it might have some kinda helpful advice, but nothing like Fakespot offered. https://www.reddit.com/r/firefox/comments/1ktm4g4/now_that_f...

If you use something else, have found a good alternative or a particular prompt you've tried in your favorite LLM to get info on an Amazon product, let us know!

doppio19 · 2 months ago
I mentioned it briefly in the blog post, but this is exactly what I'm working on! Essentially, a spiritual successor to Fakespot that combines LLM analysis, more traditional ML techniques, and rule-based heuristics to detect fake reviews. I'll likely go the "subscription with generous free trial" route, to avoid meeting the same fate as Fakespot.

I'm actively working on a prototype and have a landing page at https://www.truestar.pro if you want to get notified about when I launch.

Mtinie · 2 months ago
Please help me understand why a subscription to your service should be a valuable addition to my monthly spend.

I buy extensively from Amazon across a number of product categories. My order history shows purchases as far back as 2005 (though I cannot be sure given I remember buying things in 1998 while in college, probably on a different account). During the intervening 20 years I can count on one hand the number of products I ordered which weren’t legitimate, matched my—admittedly moderate expectations for any commercial product—or included overhyped reviews.

I’d be interested in a service like yours if I could understand how the cost would cover itself in benefits.

pogue · 2 months ago
I saw that actually. I mentioned in another post on here recently that I figured that the only way a Fakespot v2 could exist is with a subscription model, but on the other hand, it's probably not something I could afford. Good luck with it though! You could always try advertising & affiliate links as a test to monetize the service as well.
PUSH_AX · 2 months ago
I really don't think this is going to work well, like how is an LLM going to know someone paid me for my review?
4b11b4 · 2 months ago
Subscription seems wrong, will prevent adoption
4b11b4 · 2 months ago
Hmm I can see the angle
user3939382 · 2 months ago
I’ve basically settled on only buying major brands that I already know from Amazon unless it’s something that I’m okay throwing away if it doesn’t work out. I then judge by my assessment of the bad reviews.

IMHO judging these random Chinese products with the nonsense capital letter brands by actual reviews is a lost cause.

tenuousemphasis · 2 months ago
>I’ve basically settled on only buying major brands that I already know from Amazon

I wouldn't even do that, unless you can't find it anywhere else. Amazon commingles their returns form 3rd party sellers and Amazon direct. So you might order an item, find out it was actually a broken returned item, and then have Amazon call you a liar.

account42 · 2 months ago
Yeah same here. The sad thing is that even with this Amazon is still better than most of the competition.
doppio19 · 2 months ago
For the unfamiliar, Fakespot was a browser extension that flagged suspicious product reviews on sites like Amazon. Mozilla bought it just two years ago and integrated it directly into Firefox as their "Review Checker" feature. Today, to my dismay, they're sunsetting it. As someone building in this space, I wrote about Fakespot's history, the problem it solved, and why we need sustainable alternatives.
rasz · 2 months ago
Did Mozilla score some absolutely unrelated deal with Amazon by any chance recently? They killed DeepSpeech very same day NVIDIA paid them $1.5mil
doppio19 · 2 months ago
Not that I'm aware of. But I do know that in late 2024, Amazon made a change where users now have to be logged in to view product reviews beyond the ones that appear on the first page (about 8 reviews). From what I can tell, Fakespot scraped the Amazon product listing pages on their backend, so that simple change would have pretty much killed its current implementation.
i80and · 2 months ago
DeepSpeech shuttered in 2021. The repo was just made read-only the other day
ashoeafoot · 2 months ago
So they wrote a ping pong shader for monetization going with the user or selling out the user.
Solomoriah · 2 months ago
I sell books on Amazon.com through their KDP Direct platform, and I have one book with two different covers; each is its own "book" in their catalog. FakeSpot repeatedly marked reviews I knew were valid as fake; I knew this based on the fact that the same reviewer reviewed the "other" book and that review was NOT flagged as fake. And this happened multiple times, and sometimes the wording of the two reviews were different. Further investigation showed FakeSpot had rather a poor reputation overall due to too many false positives. Good riddance, as far as I'm concerned.
doppio19 · 2 months ago
That's interesting! Did you have any guesses as to what might have been setting it off to mark those reviews as false positives?
kirykl · 2 months ago
I have managed some Amazon product pages, which I know have never used fake reviews. Fakespot consistently had false positives for these items
veunes · 2 months ago
It's just hard to build a blunt tool that doesn't occasionally whack honest users too
advisedwang · 2 months ago
It is possible that that reviewer writes diverse reviews on random books so that the paid reviews it leaves have some cover.
Dwedit · 2 months ago
With removal of reviews that the seller doesn't like, there's really no point to taking Amazon's star ratings or reviews seriously. It's all a big lie.
SamuelAdams · 2 months ago
I’ve started resorting to the “x bought this month” metric instead. If a product works for thousands of people and they continue to buy 500+ units a month, clearly it is a good option.

If it does end up being a bad buy, Amazon typically has a 30 day return policy for most items. Use that and get something else.

derekp7 · 2 months ago
They also tell you if a product has a high return rate, which is helpful.
dylan604 · 2 months ago
How do you know that 500 people didn't buy a scam product this month? I put as much faith in the X people bought this as I do the X people have this in their cart. It's all a way of trying to stoke FOMO
s1mplicissimus · 2 months ago
what makes you believe that the number you see in “x bought this month” is not some variant of if (session_is_gullible_to_displayed_sales_number) { return HIGH_SALESNUMBER; } ?
yablak · 2 months ago
Pretty sure that metric can be gamed
aspenmayer · 2 months ago
There’s also the strangely still-not-even-admitted-as-problematic Amazon item page referent shuffle, where one item is for sale on a given page, and the item sold by that page points to one item by a given seller. The reviews of this item are spammed positively, and then the item being sold on that page is changed by the seller, yet the reviews follow the page, not the item sold at the time the review was placed.

This combined with Amazon’s commingling of inventory of Amazon corporate sourced items and third party seller items results in a status quo in which, when purchasing an item on a page operated by the first party manufacturer and/or first party supply chain, the Amazon item picking system may still fulfill that order via inventory sourced by third party Fulfilled by Amazon sellers who knowingly and unknowingly are selling counterfeit products. You never know what you’re going to get with Amazon, and neither does Amazon or the third party sellers. It’s insane.

alwa · 2 months ago
It sure does get there quick though. And heads back to the warehouse for free if you don’t like it.
veunes · 2 months ago
I've basically defaulted to looking for 3-star reviews with coherent complaints
jen729w · 2 months ago
Me and my partner just don't trust any reviews any more. Blogged about it here:

https://johnnydecimal.com/20-29-communication/22-blog/22.00....

So you know what we do now? Ignore the overall rating: it's worthless. Instead, go directly to the 1*. They're the only true indicator of a product/place/service.

I'm not saying take them all at face value. You still have to put in some work. But all the data is in the one-stars.

piokoch · 2 months ago
Unfortunately 1* are often bragging of some maniacs who bought a fork and they complain it is not working great as a spoon, or just black PR from the competitors. Whole reviews system is not working.
sothatsit · 2 months ago
The key is the ratio of crazy to sane 1 star reviews. Mostly crazies? Then the service is probably good. But if there are many sane 1 star reviews? Might be a bad place.
gnabgib · 2 months ago
Discussion (1222 points, 1 month ago, 761 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44063662

(62 points, 27 days ago, 15 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44184974

doppio19 · 2 months ago
Yup! And today's the day.