Readit News logoReadit News
Aloisius · 9 months ago
I hope the US manages to stays out of this one.

Hopefully Iran does a little retaliation and then goes back to their covert proxy war rather than it escalating to open warfare. I honestly don't even know if either Iran or Israel could sustain open warfare given the distances involved without dragging in other forces to help. I would rather those forces not be ours.

TiredOfLife · 9 months ago
Hopefully Iran stops their stupid proxy wars. Stops supplying Russia with drones and rockets. Stops executing thousands of people every year.
thomassmith65 · 9 months ago
Not to nitpick, but Iran doesn't execute "thousands" of people every year. They execute between 500 and 1000 a year.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Iran

DAGdug · 9 months ago
Is there a “hopefully Israel ..” version of this or is all the skepticism targeted at Islamic countries, and not USA’s “greatest ally”?
_DeadFred_ · 9 months ago
It says a lot about the discussion here that the above negative comments about the proxy nature of Israel/The USA and war are upvoted while this comment about...proxies and war is downvoted. Shows a lack a seriousness/depth of thought but instead it's all just talking points and point scoring.

Dead Comment

ivape · 9 months ago
Stay out of what? The Trump admin’s foreign policy is to allow Netanyahu to operate autonomously. The same they offer ICE.

In terms of American foreign policy interest it’s basically making us more vulnerable.

In so many words, Netanyahu might get us all killed. Trump will not decry anything Netanyahu does, so it’s 4 years of war and you better believe it. Putin also has no incentive to give Trump a peace deal. Provide enough war zone cover and Taiwan will just happen, all of a sudden. Negotiate all three peace deals, please, I’d love to see it.

Trump is out of his element here, he’ll be leaving a world at war. When you a let a pot of boiling water keep boiling on the lowest heat, you may not see all the boiling bubbles, but I assure you it’s boiling. It’s a boiling world, and without certain advents like AI, we’d literally have no positive news (think that through for a second). Without the miracle of AI, all we’d have is the most depressing world situation you could imagine.

franktankbank · 9 months ago
I don't know. I find AI to be generally pretty depressing too.
tuyguntn · 9 months ago
> The Trump admin’s foreign policy is to allow Netanyahu to operate autonomously. The same they offer ICE.

to be honest, by now, it feels like the opposite, Netanyahu is allowing Trump admin to operate autonomously when it comes to internal affairs, for foreign policy Netanyahu is dictating the US foreign policy.

Go check Twitter, for some reason 90% of congress members immediately started praying for Israel after Israel's attack, as if they were handed over the message

belter · 9 months ago
> The Trump admin’s foreign policy is to allow Netanyahu to operate autonomously.

Just say it the way it is because it's clear. US policy is run from Tel Aviv. Trump chickens out with Putin, China, and now Netanyahu....

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

mkfs · 9 months ago
Hopefully they took out some of the infrastructure Iran uses to support Russia's drone warfare against Ukraine: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HESA_Shahed_136
tguvot · 9 months ago
russia localized production long time ago and made some upgrades to drones. ukraine did bomb this week factory that makes jam resistant antenna arrays and another one that makes assembly of drones
consumer451 · 9 months ago
As I understand it, it's not fully localized and a significant portion of the 2000 to 3000/month Shahed production still comes from Iran.
bigyabai · 9 months ago
The diplomatic attempts on the US' behalf have been absolutely bewildering towards Iran. At first they refuse to negotiate, so the US lets them draw their own lines besides nuclear weapons. So Iran draws non-WMD "red line" clauses, and America ignores those immediately. Weeks of negotiating later, no signs of good-faith discussion from the US lead to the hammer coming down because there was "no other way" to solve it.

If it wasn't so goddamn confusing, it would almost appear deliberate. Between this and the US suing Yemen for peace, it's looking like a good decade to strongarm America's soft power.

someotherperson · 9 months ago
It gets worse -- the person leading the negotiations with the US was one of the targets:

> Ali Shamkhani has been severely injured in a strike targeting his house and hospitalized. Mr. Shamkhani is currently spearheading nuclear talks committee appointed by supreme leader and is former secretary of National Security Council

https://x.com/farnazfassihi/status/1933360333118111907

IAmGraydon · 9 months ago
>So Iran draws non-WMD "red line" clauses, and America ignores those immediately.

How so? What non-WMD red line clauses do you mean?

ivape · 9 months ago
It’s because American foreign policy is not dictating the future of this, it’s Israel’s project and they are directing things. America has never had any success negotiating anything in the Middle East. We take what’s given to us.
bigyabai · 9 months ago
America's foreign policy forged the first Iran deal. Clearly there was intent to try the same approach a second time, clearly it didn't work.

> America has never had any success negotiating anything in the Middle East.

Trump hasn't, let's be clear. But given his posturing towards the Gaza conflict it really shouldn't surprise you that his credit with Arabs is rock bottom.

Deleted Comment

Dead Comment

Deleted Comment

cherry_tree · 9 months ago
https://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/war/just/preemptive.shtml#:~:te...

> One ethical expert (Michael Walzer) has put forward some conditions that he thinks must be satisfied to justify a pre-emptive strike:

>an obvious intention to do injury

>active preparations that turn that intention into a positive danger

>a situation in which the risk of defeat will be greatly increased if the fight is delayed

Is there evidence of these three important points to justify this attack as “preemptive”?

breppp · 9 months ago
> An obvious intention to do injury

https://www.timesofisrael.com/iran-general-says-tehran-aims-...

"Iran general says Tehran aims to wipe Israel off the ‘global political map’", that's consistent with other leaders and the regime ideology since the very start

“We warn them [Zionists] that if a new war breaks out, it will result in their termination,”

and there are no shortage of such quotes, and even concrete plans (for example by using Hamas and Hezbollah), one attempt of which we have witnessed in 2023

https://www.terrorism-info.org.il/en/hamas-strategy-to-destr...

> active preparations that turn that intention into a positive danger

>a situation in which the risk of defeat will be greatly increased if the fight is delayed

We know independently that Iran has been enriching massive amounts of uranium to degrees of purity only suitable for nuclear weapons. See last announcement by the International Atomic Energy Agency.

According to Israel there have been other advancements in the nuclear program which might lead them to a nuclear bomb

Deleted Comment

nradov · 9 months ago
Ethics are utterly irrelevant in geopolitical affairs. When nation states face existential threats they'll do whatever it takes to survive. They might invent some ethical justification after the fact for public consumption.

And I don't mean this as a particular criticism of Israel. Most other countries do the same sort of thing when necessary.

guelo · 9 months ago
That's only because we're throwing away the hard fought prize humanity earned at the cost of two world wars and millions of lives: the system of international laws and the UN.
tastyface · 9 months ago
Is Israel facing an existential threat or Netanyahu?
_DeadFred_ · 9 months ago
1. Arming and organizing proxies to attack Israel for years is much more than just intention to do injury, it is actual. Those proxies continue attack on Israel (the latest missile launch at Israel was this week). How many missiles does a country have to eat before clause 1 if fulfilled? Any country besides Israel that number would be 1. In additional Iran does not recognise Israel's right to exist as a country and explicitly calls for Israel's destruction.

2. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-857003

3. https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/iran-news/article-857003

rasz · 9 months ago
You can only pretend Houthis are making ballistic missiles in their caves and arent directly supplied and fed targeting data by Iran to sink ships crossing red sea for so long.
cherry_tree · 9 months ago
Which of the three points are you suggesting “Iran supplies arms to the houthis in Yemen” satisfies in the above criteria to justify the preemptive attack in Tehran?
tguvot · 9 months ago
you forget that in mass media not reported that every (other) day for past couple of months there are ballistic missiles launched towards Israel

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

almogo · 9 months ago
We just got strange alerts on our phones here in Israel (3:00am local time), reading:

"""

Emergency alert: Extreme

Home Front Command instructions must be followed.

Due to the preparation for a significant threat, the Home Front Command's instructions, which are currently being distributed throughout the media, must be immediately followed.

"""

Deleted Comment

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

Deleted Comment

locallost · 9 months ago
Netanyahu's only way to preserve power is to start a mass conflict.
ivape · 9 months ago
What happened to all those protests we were seeing against him? He’s an actual war criminal now but the protests stopped. What can we infer here?
edanm · 9 months ago
The protests haven't stopped, they've been intensifying since the start of the war, especially so in the last few months. (They were larger before the war, but that's because the war itself made it much harder to protest for various reasons.)

In any case, while this government isn't popular and wouldn't be reelected according to most polls, this move against Iran is probably popular.

mrguyorama · 9 months ago
Well, um, you see, Hamas video'd themselves brutally murdering about 1200 people, including about 380 young adults at a rave, including pretty significant amounts of sexual violence and parading corpses or near dead people around Palestine.

They took around 250 people hostage.

Hundreds of thousands of Israeli people were refusing to serve in the IDF because of Palestinian oppression on October 6th. After the attacks, IDF had more volunteers than they could equip.

tguvot · 9 months ago
he is not war criminal. he is been accused of some crimes but it's unknown on what basis as indictment is confidential.

and protests are happening on daily basis

Dead Comment

thrance · 9 months ago
Fascism requires a state of permanent warfare; thereby dooming itself.

Deleted Comment