Readit News logoReadit News
dang · 3 years ago
All: I know it's a bit hard but if you're going to comment on this, please review your comment to make sure it isn't shallow, lurid, or gloating. Most posts so far in this thread have been below that line. On HN we want thoughtful, substantive, and above all curious comments—where by curious is meant intellectually curious, not gawking.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

X6S1x6Okd1st · 3 years ago
The hacker has spent the last 11 hours slowky and incrementally converting all the various tokens they got to ETH. They've been using a variety of different defi exchange and have eaten large slippage fees, at least once over 5M lost in slippage.

We're not seeing any else, e.g. laundering through another exchange, splitting into different accounts, automating the liquidation of tokens to ETH, off loading ETH into a cold wallet etc.

The on chain activity makes this look like an individual who did not prepare extensively before doing this or doesn't have the skills to use automation/operational best practices

EDIT: first outflows from 0x59abf3837fa962d6853b4cc0a19513aa031fd32b have started, they still haven't liquidated all their PAXG, a stable coin pegged to gold, unclear if it's freezable.

They were able to liquidate all of their USDT except 4M on avalanche, and all of their usdc both of which can be frozen. Dai is a usd pegged stable coin that can't be frozen, they have nearly 1% of it. Note that Dai is heavily exposed to USDC so authorities could pressure USDC to destroy Dai

biztos · 3 years ago
I'm sure this is a total noob comment but I love how the account is named "FTX Accounts Drainer" on Etherscan:

https://etherscan.io/address/0x59abf3837fa962d6853b4cc0a1951...

[Edit: and also the Heist label is very useful!]

hi5eyes · 3 years ago
common for etherscan to label malicious wallets
bonestamp2 · 3 years ago
What are the chances that this is an insider and not an outsider? I ask because the timing of this "hack" is obviously a little suspicious.
bogota · 3 years ago
the fact that it has been executed so poorly to me seems like it is an insider who woke up and thought they could get away with it because they hd access to the keys
fellellor · 3 years ago
Probably SBF himself. Even if he can’t use this funds directly he can use them as collateral with a more skilled group to fund his eventual escape from the authorities
Shocka1 · 3 years ago
I would be more inclined to think insider, but I suppose it could also be an external player. Maybe they have had access for awhile and been waiting for the right time, whenever that would have been. Either way, their hand would have been forced as of the last few days as they seem to be acting hastily.
MrMan · 3 years ago
almost surely an insider.

Deleted Comment

haldujai · 3 years ago
> The on chain activity makes this look like an individual who did not prepare extensively before doing this or doesn't have the skills to use automation/operational best practices

This may be an understatement of their skill level. It seems the individual(s) also used a Kraken account to transfer funds and have been identified per their CSO.

https://twitter.com/c7five/status/1591434844760076290?s=61&t...

X6S1x6Okd1st · 3 years ago
I believe that is the white hat group. It helps to identify the exact txns & addresses they are referring to here.
wklm · 3 years ago
what are the best practices for dumping a significant amount of illiquid shitcoins under time pressure?
X6S1x6Okd1st · 3 years ago
The harmony bridge hack by Lazarus group (north korean actor) is a good example:

The first address used is 0x0d043128146654c7683fbf30ac98d7b2285ded00

It's a bit harder to trace using public tools because they immediately start splitting off the various coins to other addresses, but looking at just the USDC:

They split it off into a single purpose address that is just responsible for converting it to ETH. They do this via private transactions utilizing uniswap v3 and a set amount just about every minute (they settled on ~2M). If you scan through them their slippage is very good here. If you wait a bit of time you let the arbitrage bots move funds from wherever is available so your slippage isn't so bad.

account responsible for USDC conversion: https://debank.com/profile/0x58f4baccb411acef70a5f6dd174af78...

This account was also responsible for a number of liquidations: https://debank.com/profile/0x9e91ae672e7f7330fc6b9bab9c259bd...

They again show good slippage and also show that they use 3 different exchanges

After they've converted everything to ETH with good slippage they then fan out to multiple accounts that then do a series of deposits into tornado cash at 100 ETH each.

They were done with the liquidation within 2 hours. This attacker is still liquidating as far as I can tell

HaZeust · 3 years ago
Bulk bridge swap service IMO. Avalanche or Fantom would be your best bet right now.
papichulo4 · 3 years ago
Asking for a friend? :)

Deleted Comment

drexlspivey · 3 years ago
Looks like he sent the money to a kraken account under his real name lol. https://cryptoslate.com/ftx-hacker-identity-discovered-by-kr...
MisterTea · 3 years ago
What if its a frame job?
zen21 · 3 years ago
> The on chain activity makes this look like an individual who did not prepare extensively before doing this or doesn't have the skills to use automation/operational best practices

How common is the knowledge of these best practices?

boppo1 · 3 years ago
A hacker who got in from the outside would probably be sophisticated enough to at least 1. automate transfers 2. launder through monero or a tumbler or something

This looks like someone who barely understands crypto because all of the transfers can be traced, and since they're apparently working manually and slowly, the audit-surface is huge.

matheusmoreira · 3 years ago
Weird. Why ETH and not Monero? ETH can be traced.
smeej · 3 years ago
They're largely ERC-20 tokens, which can be swapped for ETH on DEXes. Monero is a whole separate blockchain, and cross-chain swaps are still in their infancy and don't have markets to convert ERC-20 tokens to Monero, or definitely not with any sort of volume.

The ETH will probably eventually be laundered and some of the cleaned coins sent places they could eventually be traded for XMR and eventually cashed out, but there's no way to do that quickly, and this needs to be done quickly.

hamiltonians · 3 years ago
no hurry. it's not like he needs the money now

Deleted Comment

api · 3 years ago
Is it a coincidence that the founder of FTX seems to be fleeing to Argentina?

Of course one would assume he or his conspirators would do a better job, but maybe not if this busting out was initiated under time pressure.

Once again almost everything in cryptocurrency proves to be a scam.

matheusmoreira · 3 years ago
> Once again almost everything in cryptocurrency proves to be a scam.

Once again people on HN hate on cryptocurrencies for no good reason.

This isn't a cryptocurrency problem, it's a fractional reserve banking problem. These centralized exchanges are unregulated banks in disguise. It's no surprise to anyone that they exhibit all of the problems of unregulated banks. Problems such as "we used customer deposits to gamble, lost everything and are now insolvent".

To think one of the reasons cryptocurrency was invented was to end the need for such things...

Maursault · 3 years ago
> seems to be fleeing to Argentina?

That could only work before 1997.[1]

[1] https://www.congress.gov/treaty-document/105th-congress/18/d...

bboygravity · 3 years ago
"Once again almost everything in cryptocurrency proves to be a scam."

This is like saying "once again almost everything in US dollars proves to be a scam" after Lehman fell.

The sentence makes no sense at all to me.

AirStreamer27 · 3 years ago
How can USDC or USDT be frozen?
eightysixfour · 3 years ago
Both are centrally managed and are semi-regularly frozen at the request of authorities.
somebodythere · 3 years ago
The smart contract has an array of frozen addresses that will not be permitted to move funds, which can be edited by Centre and Tether respectively.
X6S1x6Okd1st · 3 years ago
The smart contacts have a blacklist that the companies can add to, that would disable transfers.
VagueMag · 3 years ago
Why would the attacker move the funds to any remotely censorable coin like DAI?
themihai · 3 years ago
I think he tries any avenue available. Even if 50% is lost it's still a good trade.
hamiltonians · 3 years ago
Dai cannot be censored by

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

Deleted Comment

FollowingTheDao · 3 years ago
Corporate theft is not a hacking.
seretogis · 3 years ago
When you say "corporate theft" are you referring to theft from corporations or theft by corporations? I'm not sure it's clear which is relevant here.

Deleted Comment

zeven7 · 3 years ago
> Investigating abnormalities with wallet movements related to consolidation of ftx balances across exchanges - unclear facts as other movements not clear. Will share more info as soon as we have it.

From FTX's general counsel[1], retweeted by FTX_Official. So that indicates it's not being sold off legitimately under some sort of liquidation proceedings. It could be insiders or it could be hackers.

[1] https://twitter.com/_Ryne_Miller/status/1591281729125613570

Rumors on Twitter[2] are there was also an update just pushed to the FTX app. Concerns are the update may contain malware. It makes sense to uninstall the FTX app if you have it.

[2] https://twitter.com/zachxbt/status/1591295039946493952

DavidSJ · 3 years ago
> Reports on crypto Twitter are that this is a hack

Is that based on some evidence, or is it speculation?

zeven7 · 3 years ago
I reworded things to separate the first hand information (FTX_Official indicating they don't know what's going on) from speculation (app hacker rumors).
jmathai · 3 years ago
Greed drives all of us to do things we normally wouldn’t. Given the nature of crypto, unless there’s a good reason to have the FTX app (say as opposed to using their website), then uninstalling it seems like very sound advice.

Deleted Comment

iblaine · 3 years ago
It’s unfortunate that what started out with altruistic motives, a method for decentralized anonymous asset exchange, is being derailed by opportunists. There was a time where a 51% attack was the biggest concern.

All that said, I’m not surprised at where we are today.

n0tth3dro1ds · 3 years ago
> It’s unfortunate that what started out with altruistic motives

Are you actually buying into SBF’s pathetic ideologies? Or are you more referring to Satoshi’s white paper when you refer to “altruistic motives”.

I can’t understand how anyone would take SBF seriously. He’s a smug charlatan who converted funny money to real money so that he could dump it into politics for his own aims, all while calling his actions “altruism”. Biggest false virtue signaler of all time.

readthenotes1 · 3 years ago
Most of the rules of civilization are centered around preventing the 20% predators from devouring the 80% normal people.
CPLX · 3 years ago
In times like this I often find comfort in the expression "The Purpose of a System is What It Does"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_wha...

heresie-dabord · 3 years ago
> what started out with altruistic motives, [...] is being derailed by opportunists.

See: all human history.

The essential trust anchor will always be transparency that directly affects a person in society. Anonymous money and anonymous power will be exploited.

mudrockbestgirl · 3 years ago
> Reports on crypto Twitter are that this is a hack

It's really unfortunate to get "hacked" with such bad timing. You steal customer money and file for bankruptcy but now the bad hackers, probably from the Bahamas as well, take whatever is left and cash out. Oh no! /s

But it's alright, SBF said he's sorry.

yieldcrv · 3 years ago
honestly, the vulnerability was probably already there and there was a symbiosis with the person. Rules for rulers, there are various keyholders in your empire. This company wasn't following any best practices, so no reason to think they have crypto security best practices internally.

this person absolutely knows that they can kick leadership when they're down and that all blame will go to the leadership

it doesn't require being an "apologist" for leadership to see this vulnerability. Council and compliance all resigned, the ceo resigned. Any semblance of checks are gone and any rogue developer can use their keys on anything, rumor now is that an app update went out turning them into malware.

its equally as plausible as just a cringeworthy vendetta of spiraling founders, dumber things have happened in crypto. smart things have too, I’m leaving towards a smart thing

groffee · 3 years ago
SBF takes "full responsibility".
blitzar · 3 years ago
In unrelated news SBF just found he had a bunch of crypto in his personal wallet. Totally not at all the pile of crypto that was last seen in the FTX wallet.
flylib · 3 years ago
FTX CTO Gary Wang as well has a lot of recent GitHub commit activity in last 2 days and now suddenly the site is hacked https://github.com/garywang
bluelightning2k · 3 years ago
I'm as sceptical as the next person but I don't think "coder writes code" is anything.
zone411 · 3 years ago
How do you know it's him and not somebody else with the same name? I don't see any crypto projects.

Deleted Comment

Dead Comment

dna_polymerase · 3 years ago
Yeah and I’m sure the Apple App Store review process won’t catch the steal_private_keys_and_upload_to_china() method they inserted. Not that iPhone apps can’t do this in the first place. A lot of FUD right now to create even more chaos.
0xbadc0de5 · 3 years ago
Patrick Boyle breaks down the situation with his usual eloquence and dry humor. Video is worth watching just for the chart of the corporate structure. https://youtu.be/zTFhnpf-IE0
photochemsyn · 3 years ago
Over 130 companies referenced in the bankruptcy filing, and 'around 77 companies' in that organizational chart! The first thought is that's an optimal structure for a money laundering outfit, as if those companies are constantly transferring funds from one to the other, dirty money can be fed in to that system and then get lost in the mix, coming out as fairly clean on the other end. See Nick Kochan, "The Washing Machine":

https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/21230193-the-washing-...

staindk · 3 years ago
Thanks for the link! Very good video indeed and I'll have to look into some more of his videos. Very funny and well presented.
raziel414 · 3 years ago
That video is amazing. Thanks for sharing!
rippercushions · 3 years ago
It gets worse: somebody has pushed what appears to be a malicious update to the FTX app, and the official FTX telegram channel is warning people not to even browse to the website!

https://twitter.com/zachxbt/status/1591293813519253504

graeme · 3 years ago
I’ve been trying to figure out the technicalities there. Neither the ios nor android apps have updates since the crash.

The update box is clearly based on their pre existing popup used for things like 2FA.

Could this popup have been modified with new text and linked to a new malicious site without an app update on ios or android?

Or, could the popup only function if it was already coded into the app waiting to be activated? Meaning premeditated

fshbbdssbbgdd · 3 years ago
It’s pretty common for apps to load some external content from a server to show to the user. This is useful in part because it allows you to update the content without going through the slow app review process. Potentially, if your backend got hacked, the hackers could change this content.
trollied · 3 years ago
Lots of apps these days are merely shells for web content that is hosted elsewhere.
gorbypark · 3 years ago
A couple quick searches for “ftx app react native” makes me believe at least part of their app, if not the entire thing, is react native (it’s possible to have a hybrid native/react native app). It’s totally possible and quite common to be able to load the JavaScript bundle from a remote server. Microsoft has a service to do exactly that called Codepush. Expo also has a service and it’s not very complex to roll your own. How a react native app works is all the native code is compiled into a “shell” of an app and then a JavaScript bundle is loaded (it can be shipped in the binary or loaded from a server) and that’s where all the layout and logic lives. Not only is it possible to make small changes, you could conceivably ship an entirely new app this way as long as you don’t need to add any new native dependencies. Of course the App Store/Play Store don’t allow “major” changes, but they have no real way of knowing. In Apple’s case, you need to provide them with a login for them to review the app (not sure about the play store, but possibly them too). It would be trivially to load one bundle for Apple and another for everyone else. If you had control of the backend you could even target specific accounts and load a compromised bundle with no one else the wiser. It’s fairly easy to strip out the JS bundle to examen, so I’d say targeted attacks would be the smart way to do it. It would give you a lot of time before people caught on vs compromising everyone. I’m sure there’s folks out there already tearing into the js bundle looking for shenanigans.
tootie · 3 years ago
If half of this drama happened to JP Morgan, it would be bank runs and global depression.
hestefisk · 3 years ago
Indeed. But JPM is at least regulated so it shouldn’t happen (post GFC…).
crypt1d · 3 years ago
This last week has been a rollercoaster. I've been in crypto since a long time ago and have seen quite a bit, but this FTX implosion takes the crown. And to be honest, I don't think its over.
misiti3780 · 3 years ago
Another interesting thought I keep going back to is .... since crypto is really zero sum, who the hell was on the other side of these horrible trades that has billions now?
SkyMarshal · 3 years ago
I suppose in this case it's probably a negative sum game. The assets in question are the FTT token that Alameda mined and gave to FTX as collateral, in return for real customer assets from FTX that Alameda used to gamb... er trade with. But FTT then went to zero, tanked the whole market, and the customer assets Alameda holds lost value too. Everybody loses.
crypt1d · 3 years ago
At this point it wouldn't surprise me if they siphoned off the money by being on the other side of those trades via different entities...
bombcar · 3 years ago
Supposedly from what I'm hearing from /r/buttcoin rumors, Alameda was very bad at trading, so the billions have gone to the people doing the opposite trades from Alameda, which were being funded by FTX to try to gamble back the amounts lost.
booleandilemma · 3 years ago
A rollercoaster or a skydive without a parachute?
rvba · 3 years ago
What is the difference between this, terraluna earlier this year or MTGox?
crypt1d · 3 years ago
Luna was quite bad, but it was pretty straight-forward path to death that everyone saw from a mile away. Not many people predicted that FTX and SBF will fall from grace within a timespan of 48hrs. The whole thing is also so full of scandals, theft and corruption we will be reading about this in the news for weeks to come.

mtGox was so early in crypto, there wasn't any institutional capital or major players, mostly retail/regular folks experimenting with shiny new tech. FTX is an intermingled web of retail, institutions and big name investors as well as having their own investments, huge donations to politicians, lobbying arm, etc. The fallout from this will set us back for years.

lvl102 · 3 years ago
SBF was hailed as a crypto savior just a few weeks ago after the Luna fallout. He was viewed as Warren Buffett during the financial crisis. Perhaps Coinbase will be the ultimate winner here if crypto somehow survives. I imagine more than 75-80% of the assets tied to crypto will liquidate in coming weeks. I don’t think this will be “just another” crypto blow up. It’s end game time.
xeromal · 3 years ago
I think MTGox was actually worse just due to the small size of the market then and how much of a joke their security was. FTX just seems like a fleecing job that tons of crypto exchanges and businesses have pulled off. MTGox was sheer incompetence.
cycrutchfield · 3 years ago
If you believe there is more to come and this isn’t over, are you still holding crypto?
xtracto · 3 years ago
I've been in cryptocurrencies/blockchain since 2012. I "missed" the BTC boat and got into ETH early. I'm of the thought that CeFi services like Ftx, Nexo, Coinbase and similar are stupid. The only thing that should exist is simple Exchanges between Fiat and cryptocurrency. But everything else is just a scam IMHO. Why would you do a CeFi in crypto , when theres more TAM in doing it normal FIAT? Because you want to Avoid regulation and scrutiny.

Anyways, through all this saga, I see ETH is still at $1200, which has held pretty well. I think the right price is around $600, how it was on Nov 2020, before all speculation. The rest of the price is just people playing around. But that's not what ETH is for, and these high prices are hurting it's real goal.

I'm definitely still holding crypto. Mostly ETH, because I believe in the core technology. I've done some smart contracts and have a couple ideas for the future.

But man, I surely hope all cryptos crash and burn this time, so that speculators stop polluting the technology.

xwdv · 3 years ago
Personally I liquidated all remaining crypto. I think these are the end of days for crypto and before the end of this year anyone still holding crypto assets will find them significantly less valued. There is no path to increasing value.
crypt1d · 3 years ago
I'm all in fiat right now, and will stay like that until things calm down a bit.
BeFlatXIII · 3 years ago
It's shorting time!
tfsh · 3 years ago
It's been stated that FTX can access the wallets of their customers [1], I wonder if employees or other bad actors knowing the ship is sinking have decided to - forgive me for the quip - plunder any remaining assets.

1: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/11/10/ftx-violated-its-...

SighMagi · 3 years ago
That was my first thought. Not FTX related, but I just got another email from Coinbase reassuring me that they’re not gonna use customer funds without permission. I have in the past moved my shit out of Coinbase wallets because of doubts about that. Honestly though I just want to GTFO of crypto at this point…
lottin · 3 years ago
Get out, man. Learn investment theory. All you need is a couple of index funds and bonds. Investing isn't supposed to be exciting or make you rich quick.
readthenotes1 · 3 years ago
"at some point, you are the greater fool"

"If you look around the table and can't see the chump, you are the chump"

perryizgr8 · 3 years ago
> Coinbase reassuring me that they’re not gonna use customer funds without permission

"Not gonna" is wildly different from "cannot". So are you sure they physically cannot use your funds? If that's not the case, their promise is worth just the price of sending that email to you.

throwaway743 · 3 years ago
Not to argue, but just to point out, banks can also do this. It's called "bailing-in".

Banks in the US can do it, but only with the excess of accounts containing more than $250k.

mudrockbestgirl · 3 years ago
Here is a view of the assets on-chain for anyone that's interested:

https://debank.com/profile/0x59abf3837fa962d6853b4cc0a19513a...

Currently at ~$390M. It looks like they're trying to swap most of the tokens they received into ETH on-chain.

Deleted Comment