Readit News logoReadit News
Maursault commented on Apple previews Live Speech, Personal Voice, and more new accessibility features   apple.com/newsroom/2023/0... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
detourdog · 2 years ago
I just went back to compare the Mini with the Studio again. Despite your advice I would buy the Mini again for these reasons:

I'm on a newer generation chip that has a lower power draw. Meets my network speed minimum. All for the price of the entry level Studio. This box is basically an experiment to see how much processing power I need. I have a very specific project that will require the benchmarking of Apple's machine learning frameworks. I want to see how much of a machine learning load this Mini can handle. Once I have benchmarks maybe the Pro will exist and I will be in good shape to shop and understand what I'm buying.

I think a Mini of any spec is a great value. The studio has a place but I'm hoping the Pro ends up being like an old Sun E450.

This Mini experiment is to help me frame the hardware power vs. the software loads.

Maursault · 2 years ago
> I think a Mini of any spec is a great value.

My second suggestion for 16-core was M2, also. $100 less with 1Gb, and with 10Gb it would be $100 more than you paid. i.e. two of the 8-core M2 Minis with 24GB RAM each would do about twice as much work as the high end Mini M2 Pro alone, sometimes less than twice the work, sometimes more. The same is true of two M1 Max Studios vs one M1 Extreme Studio for the same price. 2 less powerful machines spank one more powerful machine every single time, and one M1 Extreme Studio is definitely NOT worth two M1 Max Studios, same as one 12-core M2 Pro Mini is definitely NOT worth two 8-core M2 Minis.

Everyone is drawn to "the best," and that's where Apple fleeces and makes its money. Pretty consistently forever, the best buys from Apple are never the high end configurations. We may feel secure in what our choices were, doubling down on affirming them, but we definitely pay for it.

Maursault commented on Experts weigh impact of Intel-Arm collaboration   eetimes.com/experts-weigh... · Posted by u/JoachimS
re-thc · 2 years ago
Even if Intel design something similar to ARM, legacy wins. It’s not replacing mobile OS any time soon. Just like ARM isn’t replacing the Windows ecosystem soon.

As others have said Intel failed. There were Intel phones back in the days. Maybe they should have kept going even if it lost money. Maybe not. Who knows.

Not to mention Apple isn’t moving regardless since they were 1 of the founders of ARM.

Maursault · 2 years ago
> legacy wins

20 years ago, probably. I don't understand why it is still the case today that legacy is important. Who is still running very old, 25yo software, and just how are they wagging the dog?

Maursault commented on Experts weigh impact of Intel-Arm collaboration   eetimes.com/experts-weigh... · Posted by u/JoachimS
kadoban · 2 years ago
> I also don't quite get why Intel doesn't just design their own competing high efficiency architecture, after abandoning x86 and backwards compatibility, of course, something they should have done two decades ago at least.

They've tried, at least twice. Itanium and Atom come to mind. It turns out, it's not as easy as it sounds, even back when Intel was near the top of its game.

Maursault · 2 years ago
Itanium was supposed to be powerful, not efficient, and it originated at HP. Atom was x86. If Intel designed something new from the ground up with high efficiency specifications, I don't think it could be too terrible, and I think it would advance SotA to have real competition with ARM designs. The i860 may be Intel's last innovative chip design solely designed in house. Every advance in x86 is just another ugly monstrosity.
Maursault commented on Experts weigh impact of Intel-Arm collaboration   eetimes.com/experts-weigh... · Posted by u/JoachimS
Maursault · 2 years ago
Why does Intel need Arm for collaboration, and what does Arm get out of optimizing "Arm’s IP for Intel’s upcoming 18A process technology?" Why doesn't Intel license Arm designs like anyone else, and optimize it themselves? I also don't quite get why Intel doesn't just design their own competing high efficiency architecture, after abandoning x86 and backwards compatibility, of course, something they should have done two decades ago at least.
Maursault commented on Apple previews Live Speech, Personal Voice, and more new accessibility features   apple.com/newsroom/2023/0... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
detourdog · 2 years ago
I specced the smallest SSD. I use netwomr homes. The mini is a stop gap waiting for the pro. Drive size Indont really consider a performance item anymore.

I spent just over $2,000.

Mac mini With the following configuration: Apple M2 Pro with 12‑core CPU, 19-core GPU, 16‑core Neural Engine 32GB unified memory 512GB SSD storage Four Thunderbolt 4 ports, HDMI port, two USB‑A ports, headphone jack 10 Gigabit Ethernet

Im satauisfied.

Maursault · 2 years ago
Not awful, but for $2K you could have had 16-core CPU, 20-core GPU, 32-core Neural Engine, 48GB unified memory, 512K SSD storage, Four Thunderbolt 4 ports, two HDMI ports, four USB-A ports, two headphone jacks, two Gigabit Ethernet.
Maursault commented on Why KDE Plasma was chosen as the default desktop environment for Asahi Linux   social.treehouse.systems/... · Posted by u/jlpcsl
wkat4242 · 2 years ago
Yes it was. It was in fact the reason I initially tried Gnome and didn't even consider KDE when I moved away from Mac.

After spending ages finding extensions to make everything work the way I wanted to an upgrade appeared and some of them broke. I then tried KDE Neon as a live image and I was like wow, this is nice right away. And what's better, I can really make it my own, configure it the way I want to. Without having to install any extensions. That feels so welcoming after using Mac for more than a decade.

However yes in the early '00s it was an inconsistent mess I'm terms of UX. Very similar to early Android in fact. It was why I moved to Mac back then.

Maursault · 2 years ago
A lot can change in that amount of time and apparently has. Also, as you're very likely aware, KDE runs on macOS, though idky anyone would want to do that. It certainly wouldn't draw anyone back from FreeBSD. The best and worst parts of macOS are BSD — best because there is a BSD userland, and worst because it's inexplicably outdated.
Maursault commented on Colossal Biosciences Aims to ‘De-Extinct’ the Woolly Mammoth   blogs.nvidia.com/blog/202... · Posted by u/bcaulfield
Metacelsus · 2 years ago
See my take on this here: https://www.readcodon.com/p/extinction

Basically, it will be quite challenging and I think they are over-promising on the timeline. They are also not even going to make a wooly mammoth, but rather a hairy elephant.

Maursault · 2 years ago
It's just such a waste of time, resources and talent, when it would be vastly better, and presumably easier, to stop the extinction of vaquita, black rhinoceros and other subspecies, saola, tiger species, leopard species, elephants and sub-species, gorillas and subspecies, orangutang, and hundreds of species of fish, frogs and insects. We don't need fake mammoth. Save the vaquita. And save the Amazon Rainforest, and whatever is left of every other forest.
Maursault commented on Why KDE Plasma was chosen as the default desktop environment for Asahi Linux   social.treehouse.systems/... · Posted by u/jlpcsl
wkat4242 · 2 years ago
KDE is so great <3. It's everything Mac and Windows should have been. I also donate to it monthly because I feel it's software really worth paying for.

On the contrary, I despise Gnome 3. Gnome 2 wasn't bad but in 3 everything rubs me the wrong way. It's like they went out of their way to design something that wouldn't suit me :) The mimimalism, the thick "touch-style" window decorations, the "always an extra click" hamburger menus. The "You're holding it wrong" attitude. Basically all the issues that come with Apple-style opinionated design. And mentioned in the source article too. Nevertheless I'm glad other people do like it. That's the good thing about FOSS, there's something for everyone.

I had the same feeling about recent macOS versions so I'm really happy I moved to KDE (on FreeBSD). Having choice and configurability again is amazing.

This is really the power of FOSS and calls for a unified desktop would seriously undermine that. One size does not fit all.

Maursault · 2 years ago
> KDE is so great.

Funny, back in 2006ish, KDE development was stalled, and it was a janky, inconsistent mess. Everyone hated it and used Gnome, which had a simpler design and was far more stable and smooth.

Maursault commented on Apple previews Live Speech, Personal Voice, and more new accessibility features   apple.com/newsroom/2023/0... · Posted by u/todsacerdoti
detourdog · 2 years ago
Just yesterday I started using a new maxed out Mac mini and everything about it is snappy. I have no doubt that it is ready for enormous amount of background processing. Heavy background work is the only way to use the processing power in that little computer.
Maursault · 2 years ago
> Just yesterday I started using a new maxed out Mac mini and everything about it is snappy.

Really?! I didn't think anyone here would fall for that.

      Mac Mini 12-core M2, 19-core GPU, 32GB, 10Gbit, 8TB storage? $4500

      Mac Studio 20-core M1, 48-core GPU, 64GB, 10Gbit, 1TB storage is $4000. 128GB of RAM is $800 more
but either Studio RAM configuration obviously spanks the M2 mini. It's sacrificing Apple's expensive storage, but with Thunderbolt 3 it's pretty academic to find 8TB or more of NVMe storage, probably 32GB of NVMe RAID[1], for less than Apple's charge of $2200 above cost of 1TB.

[1] https://eshop.macsales.com/shop/express-4m2

Maursault commented on Windows 2000 64-bit for Alpha AXP   virtuallyfun.com/2023/05/... · Posted by u/zdw
lproven · 2 years ago
There was never an "NT 4.1".

Do you mean 3.1, the 1st release?

Maursault · 2 years ago
SP1

u/Maursault

KarmaCake day2251September 24, 2020View Original