Readit News logoReadit News
CPLX commented on Control shopping cart wheels with your phone (2021)   begaydocrime.com/... · Posted by u/mystraline
seszett · 3 days ago
> which is pretty cheap for a whole ass trolley.

It's not an incentive to "not steal the trolley", it's an incentive to put it back in its place for people who were already not planning on stealing one.

This way the store and the customers don't have to deal with trolleys strewn around everywhere and blocking parking spaces, among other advantages.

I think when they removed the coins during Covid they just noticed that most people were already well-behaved enough to return the carts to their places, so the incentive is just not needed anymore. Actually in Belgium, Colruyt had never had coins for their carts and it just works.

CPLX · 2 days ago
> it's an incentive to put it back in its place for people who were already not planning on stealing one.

It’s also an incentive for anyone else.

If I put the coin in and then leave the cart in the lot anyways, someone who wanders by is also incentivized to grab it and put it back, as they would get a free coin.

The system is actually somewhat elegant, if you return the cart you pay nothing and if you don’t you pay a small fine to whoever does.

CPLX commented on It's the Housing, Stupid   ofdollarsanddata.com/its-... · Posted by u/throw0101c
RugnirViking · 6 days ago
People don't say home ownership is important because it's an asset for retirement; if you sold it, you wouldn't have a home in retirement!

They say that because owning a home allows you to reduce your bills, but also more crucially and viscerally because owning a home allows you to be free and have a place that is truly yours to do with what you will. You can paint the walls, have a pet, host a party, knock down a wall and build an extension, do whatever you like to make your mark on it and the world. It's yours and if you will it, it always will be. It's a level of peace and security that's almost incomparible. There's a reason in most of history there was a distinction drawn between bonded peasants and freeholders.

CPLX · 6 days ago
It’s all this but don’t underestimate predictability. If you own a home with a fixed rate mortgage you know what your payment is and it doesn’t change. You know where your kids are going to grow up.

Sure you might need a new roof and insurance and taxes fluctuate but that’s a BIG BIG deal as anyone who’s rented and been at the mercy of markets can tell you.

This is even more true now as the rental market (like so many markets) is coming to be dominated by corporate landlord La using revenue extracting software.

Dead Comment

CPLX commented on Google admits anti-competitive conduct involving Google Search in Australia   accc.gov.au/media-release... · Posted by u/Improvement
lazide · 7 days ago
Since no one is running ‘pure’ capitalism, what is your point exactly?
CPLX · 7 days ago
His point seemed really clear to me.
CPLX commented on Seagate spins up a raid on a counterfeit hard drive workshop   tomshardware.com/pc-compo... · Posted by u/gjvc
flufluflufluffy · 8 days ago
Full headline: “Seagate spins up a raid on a counterfeit hard drive workshop — authorities read criminals' writes while they spill the beans”

The writer waited his entire life for this moment xD

CPLX · 8 days ago
It’s clever but shouldn’t it be “read criminals rights”?

Or is it even more clever than I can parse?

CPLX commented on AI is different   antirez.com/news/155... · Posted by u/grep_it
gdubs · 8 days ago
AI has been improving at a very rapid pace, which means that a lot of people have really outdated priors. I see this all the time online where people are dismissive about AI in a way that suggests it's been a while since they last checked-in on the capabilities of models. They wrote off the coding ability of ChatGPT on version 3.5, for instance, and have missed all the advancements that have happened since. Or they talk about hallucination and haven't tried Deep Research as an alternative to traditional web-search.

Then there's a tendency to be so 'anti' that there's an assumption that anyone reporting that the tools are accomplishing truly impressive and useful things must be an 'AI booster' or shill. Or they assume that person must not have been a very good engineer in the first place, etc.

Really is one of those examples of the quote, "In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's mind there are few."

It's a rapidly evolving field, and unless you actually spend some time kicking the tires on the models every so often, you're just basing your opinions on outdated experiences or what everyone else is saying about it.

CPLX · 8 days ago
I agree with you. I am a perpetual cynic about new technology (and a GenXer so multiply that by two) and I have deeply embraced AI in all parts of my business and basically am engaging with it all day for various tasks from helping me compare restaurant options to re-tagging a million contact records in salesforce.

It’s incredibly powerful and will just clearly be useful. I don’t believe it’s going to replace intelligence or people but it’s just obviously a remarkable tool.

But I think at least part of the dynamic is that the SV tech hype booster train has been so profoundly full of shit for so long that you really can’t blame people for skepticism. Crypto was and is just a giant and elaborate grift, to name one example. Also guys like Altman are clearly overstating the current trajectory.

The dismissive response does come with some context attached.

CPLX commented on Perplexity offers to buy Google Chrome for $34.5B   theverge.com/news/758218/... · Posted by u/ndr
nodesocket · 12 days ago
This is a troll right by Aravind? $34B is nearly double the valuation of Perplexity. I find it hard to believe so called “multiple investment funds” agreed to pony up that much cash. Kind of childish by Aravind.
CPLX · 12 days ago
I don't think any serious tech company with somewhat competent leadership would have any bit of trouble raising that much cash to buy Chrome if they had an accepted offer and ability to close.
CPLX commented on Claude Sonnet 4 now supports 1M tokens of context   anthropic.com/news/1m-con... · Posted by u/adocomplete
ivape · 12 days ago
My ability to break a problem down does not start from listing the files out and reading a few.

I does, it’s just happening at lightning speed.

CPLX · 12 days ago
We don't actually know that.

If we had that level of understanding of how exactly our brains do what they do things would be quite different.

CPLX commented on Did California's fast food minimum wage reduce employment?   nber.org/papers/w34033... · Posted by u/lxm
bko · 15 days ago
People like to think that employment is pretty much the only good that does not result in a mismatch of supply and demand from a price floor.

Take for instance a proposal that says "no one is allowed to sell their used car for less than $10k". Maybe the justification is poor people are desperate and sell their car too cheap and all these dealerships and buyers are a monopsony underbidding the real value of the car, profiting off these uninformed, unorganized individual sellers.

Does anyone think this is a good idea? Would anyone bother reading studies contemplating the effect this may have?

No, of course not. Everyone knows that this would essentially mean many cars that would have sold under $10k would just not get sold. Sure some people would benefit, maybe getting a higher price for their car. Some things would shift, maybe people would opt for scooters or e-bikes or something.

But I wouldn't want this price floor if I was on either side, trying to offload a bad car or buying one.

CPLX · 15 days ago
We absolutely do have laws that are the equivalent of “no one is allowed to sell their used car for less than X".

These laws take the form of transfer and registration fees for vehicles, taxes, and especially inspection requirements. We also have much stricter requirements on what a large commercial enterprise can sell versus a private individual.

We have rules like that for everything. We also say you can’t sell houses for less than X by mandating things like how many stairwells they have, and so on.

To the extent you’re tempted to argue some semantics about how you could still sell a car for a dollar you’re wrong and missing the point on purpose by arguing over the definitions in a way that doesn’t change the principle.

We do this because we are a society and we get to decide what the society looks like. Prices are downstream of our value system.

CPLX commented on What the Windsurf sale means for the AI coding ecosystem   ethanding.substack.com/p/... · Posted by u/whoami_nr
krat0sprakhar · 16 days ago
> Google also licensed the Windsurf IP.

Exactly! That definitely means that the $82M ARR business and the tech behind it is definitely valuable to Google

CPLX · 15 days ago
Far more likely is that they needed to do this so that whoever does own windsurf at the end of this can’t sue Google on account of all the IP that the former employees walked off with.

u/CPLX

KarmaCake day22570April 4, 2014
About
live/work in: downtown brooklyn new york

founder and ceo of: fromdayone.co

occasionally at: twitter.com/nickbaily

sometimes write things in: rails, bash, the english language

View Original