Readit News logoReadit News
kyrylo · a year ago
I’ve always wondered who else uses Ruby on Rails besides the usual names like GitHub, Shopify, Basecamp, etc.

Last month, I built a directory of web apps built with the Rails framework.

With Rails 8 released last year, the framework is stronger than ever. Some even say it’s experiencing a renaissance.

There are already 21 submissions, and if you use Rails, you’re welcome to add your app or website!

kamikazeturtles · a year ago
While I like frameworks like Rails and Django, Golang with AI makes me very productive. Especially because of how Golang codebases don't use too many dependencies so an LLM never recommends code that has an old dependency or mismatched version...

I'm just curious, how well does Ruby integrate with AI tools?

two_cents · a year ago
I don't have a lot of experience with Golang and AI, I think Rails can give you different kind of productivity.

From what I know (please correct me if I am wrong) most people use AI to create scaffolding and automate all boring and repetitive tasks in a project. So code still needs to be written, you just outsource it to AI helper.

In Rails you write less code and concentrate on business logic because everything boring like DAL, authorization, caching is already written and tested in production.

edit: syntax

bb88 · a year ago
A singular data point here, but if I ask MS Copilot to write me a unit test in python/django it will more often get it right the first time than in golang. The golang code tends to reference things that don't exist. These aren't huge codebases either.
Zanfa · a year ago
Not sure about Ruby in general, but Rails is an excellent candidate for LLM assistance. It’s very much convention over configuration, been around since forever and there isn’t a question somebody hasn’t already asked on Stack Overflow.
fchief · a year ago
It works great with AI tools. Checkout the LangChain or Boxcars gem.
kyrylo · a year ago
I like Golang too, I use it whenever I can.

I haven't done any AI with Ruby, but from what I saw, the ecosystem is lacking support of good libraries.

correlator · a year ago
This is a great point. I often ask LLMs which coding language they are most proficient in, and Python is the most typical response. This has makes me want to write more Python.
racl101 · a year ago
Certain cities it's like a Rails desert. I'd love to get a job using it but it's slim pickings. It's either .NET or PHP and maybe some Python and maybe some Node most of the time for web dev.
ge96 · a year ago
I wonder if you can scan sites and check for rails. I know if there is an error the dump if visible can tell you it's rails like ActiveRecord
AugurCognito · a year ago
There exist websites like https://builtwith.com so the answer to your question is yes.
dcdc123 · a year ago
Canvas LMS is built on rails. It is open source, too.
ksec · a year ago
Cookpad.

Generally speaking you will find Rails being used more in Business or SaaS rather than consumer.

desireco42 · a year ago
Excellent idea, I find it really useful.
kyrylo · a year ago
It’s my pleasure!
sam0x17 · a year ago
would love to be able to see them sorted by [insert 2025 equivalent of Alexa traffic rankings here]
devKnight · a year ago
I've always been interested in rails, even though my career has gone the JS/TS route. Think i might finally take the plunge and try to build some random stuff with it. See how far i can get by looking at code examples and asking gpt "how do you do x in rails" etc.

Really love that it seems to just be a complete toolbox, especially for a solo project.

Also seeing more and more rails roles out there, but obviously don't have 5+ years with the framework

LargeWu · a year ago
There was a period of time around the height of Rails original heyday where the idea of a very opinionated, complete framework such as Rails got a lot of blowback, which gave rise to the Javascript ecosystem and its myriad front-end frameworks.

I think the pendulum is kind of swinging back the other way now. While there are certainly advantages with the Node ecosystem, it always felt very messy to me. Rails language extensions, ORM, testing, and migrations frameworks have never been matched by any javascript libraries. Ruby and Rails have always prioritized quality of life features, which made it a very enjoyable and productive framework.

LordShredda · a year ago
I think the reason rails has stuck around is because of it being a very opinionated framework and it dictates a method to do almost anything. This allows the docs to be very straightforward, almost as if they were written for the Rails application itself.

I also think the language itself is a big plus. I don't like the reflection system or hot patching being a feature in a language, but rails makes extensive use of it to create it's own domain specific language.

devKnight · a year ago
Yeah, i mainly deal with react/next + supabase on a daily basis at work.

And do sometimes think of small apps i could build for fun, but the thought of doing react, again, is tiring in and of itself lol plus the whole setup around getting express running and picking packages.

Rails is ready out of the box, for me to not have to screw around with.

Just love the ruby syntax(along with python, which i am actively learning now with datacamp). Its cleaner, and i can probably do 90% of what i do in react there. Then for the rest throw solid js or svelte, or even just react for specific components.

dewey · a year ago
Can only encourage you, I'm mostly working with Go but all my side projects are with Rails which I've only started a few years ago. It's a lot of fun.

I'm not a big fan of watching tutorials, but more of learning by doing but I signed up for https://gorails.com when I started out and it was very helpful to get an overview.

_mlbt · a year ago
I’m similarly interested in learning Rails.

Does anyone here have any recommendations for free or at least very cheap Rails hosting for a toy app just for learning purposes? I’m looking for a PaaS offering since I don’t have the time to secure and manage a VPS.

graypegg · a year ago
You might also want to try Kamal, which Rails is already configured for out of the box.

You'll still be spinning up a VPS, but at least set up and management is done via a very heroku-like interface from your local machine. Just get any VPS that will be accessible via SSH, and `kamal setup` can handle the rest. [1]

The one annoying part right now, is it relies on a docker registry you have to provide. I think they're working on removing that requirement, but you can use the free github container registry until then. It's just for rollbacks AFAIK.

[0] https://kamal-deploy.org/

[1] https://kamal-deploy.org/docs/installation/

WaxProlix · a year ago
I haven't used their Rails hosting, but I have liked Fly.io for other PaaS-y things before. Heroku is technically still around.

https://fly.io/docs/rails/getting-started/

evantbyrne · a year ago
Does it really take any more time to secure a VPS than a docker container on a custom runtime for a hobby project? Either way you still have to run software and OS updates.
nimonian · a year ago
You could probably dockerize it and stick it on render.com
3pt14159 · a year ago
Heroku is decent although I don't like some of the tweaks you can't do with it. For example, setting variables in postgres is neutered.
thatguyagain · a year ago
Rails 8 made me love Rails again after a few years working with other tools. The new direction is just perfect, specially for solo developers. The 'solid trifecta' in combination with the simplicity of using sqlite3, the new built in auth solution, Kamal... everything, so f*ing good.
dewey · a year ago
> sqlite3

I know sqlite3 is great, but I've always found it much more annoying to use it on a server for small side projects than just using Postgres where I could just connect to the prod instance from my local machine and run some queries to look at the data. With sqlite I'd always have to sync files, set up volumes, make sure permissions are correct vs. just setting an environment variable to a PG instance.

marvstazar · a year ago
From what I understand, the sqlite3 comment was made it context of the Solid libraries. Basically common Redis-backed functionality can now be sqlite3-backed instead.

I do share your preference on using Postgres as the main database. Having that as the main db with sqlite3 used for auxiliary functionality sounds great.

dhamidi · a year ago
It's not much different than with Postgres:

    ssh your-server sqlite3 /tmp/path/to/your/db.sqlite3
Or if you're using Kamal, then the choice of database is completely transparent:

    kamal app exec -i --reuse bin/rails console

skullone · a year ago
I've been out of rails for more than a decade, ended up mostly with Django, but I always kinda miss rails. But Django has treated me so well, just wish async and python in general had more legs on this side
kyrylo · a year ago
We Use Rails uses SQLite, by the way
werdnapk · a year ago
I've used nothing but Rails since about 2004. Of course I've been integrating and playing with various JS frameworks over the same time period, but the only things that's remained consistent is Rails as the base. I've gone through at least 4 or 5 different JS frameworks in that time and that aspect of development has grown rather tiresome.
maxehmookau · a year ago
Been using Rails professionally for 13 years (currently at GitLab) and I still don't think anything else beats it for developer happiness and productivity.

It cuts through all the mess of modern web development so well and makes turning an idea in to something deployable incredibly easy.

swat535 · a year ago
I’ve also been working with Rails for many years now but I disagree I think developer and happiness are subjective and I’ve seen great applications being built by many people in various languages. The key is picking the tool you are most proficient with and one that also aligns with your technical requirements. I certainly wouldn’t build a Discord with Rails..
cloverich · a year ago
Hey there's some selection bias going on there! Rails is great for consistency and even better if its your jam. Its stable and high quality and still headed in a great direction. Its a great choice. Especially if you can work in it long term, and pay its learning curve only once.

...but as someone using it in Anger for a few years now, I long for the day I can say goodbye to it and never look back, for all the usual reasons.

maxehmookau · a year ago
I should say that I've not been using Rails _exclusively_ for that period. But it's the one framework that sticks around in my toolkit no matter what. It's what I reach for in any new project by default.
whstl · a year ago
I was also using it in anger until recently, and I'm really glad I got out of it.

But I disagree that it's consistent or that it leads to consistency.

The "Rails way" or "DHH way" of building apps is indeed consistent, but most big teams eschew this in the name of more complicated (and less consistently applied) patterns.

It follows the Anna Karenina principle to a T. All good codebases are alike and follow the Rails way; each bad codebase is bad in its own way and uses bullshit like Trailblazer, Active Interactors, over-engineered Service Objects or some other bullshit. Sometimes all of them at the same time.

gvurrdon · a year ago
The main application I have to work with now ended up, for various reasons, as a Rails API with a Vue client.

The Rails part has been easy to maintain and adapt to users' frequent changes, the main issues being feature requests for very complicated queries which then end up being slow. Vue has taken up a lot of time with the migration from 2 -> 3 (still not finished).

douchescript · a year ago
What’s the best way to use JavaScript on rails these days?

I’ve been using rails for over 20 years and still love it but the JavaScript story has always been in flux in bad ways. I don’t like the turbo stuff or stimulus. Basically just want to be able to add some nice charts, and some enhancements like confirmation for links. Basically just build admins with it so the caching for partial html just isn’t part of the game. Looked at upgrading to rails 8 now but the javascript in last version of rails was fragmented and complicated, so looking to find a good way to do it in a standard way now, hopefully next version of rail’s doesn’t change everything again.

itsthecourier · a year ago
just use importmaps

https://guides.rubyonrails.org/working_with_javascript_in_ra...

- Adding npm Packages with importmap-rails To add new packages to your import map-powered application, run the bin/importmap pin command from your terminal:

$ bin/importmap pin react react-dom

Then, import the package into application.js as usual:

import ReactDOM from "react-dom"

douchescript · a year ago
It would be a valid thing if there was a documented way to convert a generic node package to import map. Not much stuff in that importmap ecosystem - seems doa.
douchescript · a year ago
But how do you integrate and turn on at a specific page/controller view? Look for a specific dom id?
breckenedge · a year ago
The fragmentation is more an implication of the ever changing landscape of JS frameworks and build tools than Rails.

For me, Stimulus adds just the right amount of structure over Vanilla JS.

And Turbo/Hotwire feels like building skyscrapers with wood vs. steel.

mardifoufs · a year ago
What? No, it's just rails that has changed how it handles JS, or at least the recommended way to handle JS very often throughout the year. It's weird to blame it on the JavaScript ecosystem. Like I can't figure out what changes in the JS ecosystem you are referring to exactly.
ramesh31 · a year ago
It's such a shame that a big successful Rails or Django equivalent never really materialized in the Node world. It's not like nobody tried. There were so many times it seemed like one was gaining traction, then it would be abandoned or zombified or commercialized, and it just never happened. I really can't understand why.
rizalp · a year ago
Have you checked https://adonisjs.com/ ? Seems it follows the Rails / Laravel way of doing things
reducesuffering · a year ago
It's essentially Next.js. I believe the only thing missing is ORM, but you have choices, for better or worse, in Prisma and Drizzle.

You do have to pick an auth lib (most use Next-Auth aka Auth.js) but Rails needed auth lib until Rails 8 a couple months ago.

The traction behind Next.js is so large, it's much bigger than Rails, Django, and Laravel for new projects the last couple years: https://trends.stackoverflow.co/?tags=next.js,ruby-on-rails,...

ramesh31 · a year ago
Indeed Next is the closest we've gotten, but see: commercialized. The default path for Rails and Django is not a vendor locked in cloud offering; they are truly FOSS projects. It seems like its that mentality which died out more than anything else, really. Also "just picking an ORM" is actually one of the key killer features of Django/Rails in general. There is no fully batteries included equivalent for JS land sadly.
joshlemer · a year ago
Laravel still seems a lot more fleshed out on the back end. Job queues, task scheduling, notifications, migrations, email. Seems to be a lot more of a cohesive package, everything working together.