Works as long as you don’t have to ask ”which Google sheet” if you just have one sheet for a particular problem you are not in a world of hurt.
Readit Newsdouchescript commented on I only use Google Sheets mayberay.bearblog.dev/why... · Posted by u/mugamuga
douchescript commented on I think it's time to give Nix a chance maych.in/blog/its-time-to... · Posted by u/pacmansyyu
Nix + flakes & direnv is the perfect dev environment, run it on the Mac and everybody in team can setup any project in seconds. We also have a makefile that sets up Postgres / init,start,stop with a local file socket - so every project instance has it’s own db instance. Very jummy.
That said I wish it was easier to be able to pick a specific build of for example ruby like ruby-3.3.7-p123.
just use importmaps
https://guides.rubyonrails.org/working_with_javascript_in_ra...
- Adding npm Packages with importmap-rails To add new packages to your import map-powered application, run the bin/importmap pin command from your terminal:
$ bin/importmap pin react react-dom
Then, import the package into application.js as usual:
import ReactDOM from "react-dom"
It would be a valid thing if there was a documented way to convert a generic node package to import map. Not much stuff in that importmap ecosystem - seems doa.
Rails has changed it four times in 12 years:
* Prototype
* Asset pipeline
* Webpacker
* Importmaps
There was also the coffeescript romance, that was brief. But maybe earlier.
just use importmaps
https://guides.rubyonrails.org/working_with_javascript_in_ra...
- Adding npm Packages with importmap-rails To add new packages to your import map-powered application, run the bin/importmap pin command from your terminal:
$ bin/importmap pin react react-dom
Then, import the package into application.js as usual:
import ReactDOM from "react-dom"
But how do you integrate and turn on at a specific page/controller view? Look for a specific dom id?
What’s the best way to use JavaScript on rails these days?
I’ve been using rails for over 20 years and still love it but the JavaScript story has always been in flux in bad ways. I don’t like the turbo stuff or stimulus. Basically just want to be able to add some nice charts, and some enhancements like confirmation for links. Basically just build admins with it so the caching for partial html just isn’t part of the game. Looked at upgrading to rails 8 now but the javascript in last version of rails was fragmented and complicated, so looking to find a good way to do it in a standard way now, hopefully next version of rail’s doesn’t change everything again.
douchescript commented on Atkinson Dithering (2021) beyondloom.com/blog/dithe... · Posted by u/jdblair
Am I the only person who thinks the Floyd-Steinberg dithering is superior is clarity and detail?
The Atkinson dithering makes the image appear overexposed/blown-out (not true to the original image).
I prefer Atkinson dithering. I think it preserves more details when the resolution is very low. For more high resolutions floyd-steinberg is better though
douchescript commented on Atkinson Dithering (2021) beyondloom.com/blog/dithe... · Posted by u/jdblair
To avoid changing the overall brightness like in the examples it is important to work on linearized values or to adjust the running error accordingly. It's not correct to work on the encoded sRGB values of the image directly. This is a very common mistake in blog articles about diy image filtering.
Please explain what you mean, atkinson dither loses 1/4 of the error to gain in contrast and details, rendering the top whites washed out. What's your recommended formula for converting the image to gray before dithering
douchescript commented on Things to avoid in Ruby blog.appsignal.com/2024/0... · Posted by u/unripe_syntax
I do prefer always using self.attribute, it’s a little bit longer but there’s no ambiguity. Otherwise you would have to have all props in your head when reading the code.
couldn't help being cheeky...actually there are quite a few contributors.