Readit News logoReadit News
jbandela1 · 2 years ago
I actually wish the airlines did the reverse: allow 2 free checked bags but charge for carryons that don’t fit under your seat.

It is the carryons that make boarding stressful, where everyone worries that if they are not at the front of the line the bins will be full by the time they board. Also, they slow boarding as people stand in the aisles looking for an empty overhead bin or else trying to play Tetris to fit their luggage into an almost full bin.

From reading the article, it seems that may get the same tax benefits as the checked baggage fees.

volkl48 · 2 years ago
In my experience the newest aircraft are solving the overhead bin space question with larger bins that are nearly 1:1 in terms of passengers vs number of standard carry-ons that they can fit in the bins.

https://www.boeing.com/commercial/737max/space-bins

Pretty sure Airbus has some similar thing.

Not saying I expect the anxiety to fully disappear/that there will never be a forced gate checking of a bag again in the future, but I do think this will become much less of a problem than it's been in the past 5-10 years.

orev · 2 years ago
Airlines want to optimize for all space being used on the plane, not boarding speed. Free checked bags would mean many empty overhead bins, which is wasted space. When the overhead bins are full, it leaves more space in the cargo area that they can sell to other companies who want to use it.
Two4 · 2 years ago
Not strictly true - airlines also optimise on turnaround time. There's likely a sweet spot of bins packed vs landing-to-takeoff time.
bbarn · 2 years ago
It's a pretty polarizing subject. I am in the "just check all my crap and be done with it" camp, but many people you'll have to pry their roller bag carry ons from their cold dead hands.
freedomben · 2 years ago
If you have expensive electronics or a controlled substance prescription, you're a fool to let them pry your bag from your hands. United recently forceably checked my carryon bag (because I hadn't paid extra to be in a lower boarding group) on a long international flight (multiple connections) where I would be without my belonging for 40 hours. Pretty rough when you will start going through withdrawals after 8 hours. It was like the end of the scene from Planes, Trains, and Automobiles where the car rental lady (after receiving abuse from Steve Martin's character, which didn't happen in this case) coldly tells him, "you're fucked."
stvltvs · 2 years ago
I will go to great lengths to keep control of my luggage in my own hands. Haven't checked luggage in many years.
HumblyTossed · 2 years ago
I have a backpack that fits in the overhead. I don't pack more than will fit in there. My personal item is usually my work laptop, not letting that go. I see no reason to check anything.
andrewflnr · 2 years ago
You've never had the airline lose your checked luggage, huh?

Dead Comment

bluGill · 2 years ago
I live in a tiny city. I get the best of both worlds by gate-checking my bags. I don't have to find carryone space, and my bags are waiting for me at the gate when I get off the plane. I also get to have both a window and an aisle seat on the plane since the plane is so small.
xingped · 2 years ago
I've had bags destroyed or lost by baggage handlers more times than I can count. No thanks. I never check bags anymore.

Dead Comment

jimmydddd · 2 years ago
And some folks have to put their bags in an overhead bin further back in the plane than their seat. This really slows things down when getting off the plane, as they have to fight their way back before going forward to leave.
otoburb · 2 years ago
As a previously frequent traveler on both domestic and international flights, pushing your way through to the back while everybody is standing up waiting to deplane doesn't have to slow things down if those passengers waited until enough people have deplaned.

This courtesy doesn't help those passengers who need to catch a tight connection, but if everybody else followed this more polite protocol then deplaning would be less stressful and likely quicker for everybody.

Dead Comment

spencerflem · 2 years ago
I've always thought it was price discrimination, so the people who really want a cheap flight can put up with less bags instead of not flying at all
Aurornis · 2 years ago
It can be both.

As someone who travels light (even with kids) I appreciate it. I check 1 bag at most and it incentivizes us to pack smartly. The people who want to bring a lot of bags can pay for it as needed.

rand0mx1 · 2 years ago
Can you share your strategy regarding smart packing?
ethagknight · 2 years ago
Discrimination? Or just charging for service/capacity?
Aurornis · 2 years ago
“Price discrimination” is an economic term. It doesn’t carry the same negative connotations as “discrimination” in a social sense.
CubsFan1060 · 2 years ago
I would guess OP is using the other definition [1]

"DISCERNING, JUDICIOUS discriminating buyers"

[1] https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discriminating

vinaypai · 2 years ago
I'm okay with bag fees. There is a real cost to carrying extra bags. I pack light and don't see why I need to subsidize other people if it's bundled.

On the other hand, fees for things like seat assignment (regular seats, not just the exit rows and such) are just an annoying cash grab.

verall · 2 years ago
AA will make you pay extra to "choose your own seat" ($75-$150 extra per ticket for basic economy -> main cabin) and then block off all but 3 rows as "premium seats" so that you can pay $30+/leg/person to sit with your party/travel companion after paying already paying extra. Better get to the airport early and beg the gate attendant or spend an additional $240+ (1 layover, 2 passengers)!

If you book a codeshare they don't even try to let you choose, they simply put in the fine print that the choosing your own seat perk "may not apply to partner airlines".

I hate it.

airtag · 2 years ago
It's not only that - the bag prices mess with price comparison web sites so much, that it's impossible to find the best deal. Win-Win for the airlines.
jessriedel · 2 years ago
Kayak has mostly solved this. You select number of carry-on and checked bags, and it uses the inclusive price.
lotsofpulp · 2 years ago
Kayak/Google flights/expedia all allow you to select number of carry on and checked bags.
amelius · 2 years ago
It's all because opaque pricing allows airline companies to make more profits.
matwood · 2 years ago
Maybe I just fly a lot, but baggage fees are pretty clear along with limits.
afavour · 2 years ago
But they don’t appear on price comparison sites. So if you’re shopping around and you see a Delta flight for $300 and a Spirit flight for $200 you have no idea which is actually cheaper. Every time I’ve flown Spirit the baggage price has been variable (based on miles flown maybe? No idea) so it’s not like comparison sites could even add it if they wanted to.
dartos · 2 years ago
Right, but if you’re not a frequent flier and are trying to just plan a trip, the amount of extra work it takes to determine the actual round trip price (incl. baggage fees) for several different airline is prohibitive.

Many people just pick the cheapest price on cheap tickets or something (which is usually spirit. They famously charge so much for baggage that they end up being more expensive than other airlines)

Aurornis · 2 years ago
I don’t fly a lot any more but I haven’t found it to be confusing at all. Even the price comparison websites make it easy to select a number of bags.

I don’t understand these comments about how it’s confusing. It’s all quite clear.

_fat_santa · 2 years ago
I feel like there's always a tradeoff. In the past year I've flown both Frontier and United. Frontier makes you pay for your bags (except for a single personal item), while United gives you a free carry-on and checked bag.

It would seem as though Frontier is milking you until you look at the ticket price. I calculated that if I took that United flight with Frontier instead and paid for 1 carry on + 1 checked bag (what United offered for free), the flight would still be cheaper than the United flight.

lotsofpulp · 2 years ago
United basic economy does not give you a free carry on or checked bag, and United economy does not give you a free checked bag. And it has been that way for 10+ years.

https://www.united.com/en/us/fly/travel/inflight/basic-econo...

>Carry-on bags are not included unless you're flying to Canada, South America, across the Atlantic or on an international flight across the Pacific.

saas_sam · 2 years ago
Ah yes, the famously uncompetitive, highly profitable airline industry, earning a net... 2.7% profit in 2023.

https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2023-releases/2023-12-06-0...

mint2 · 2 years ago
Objection!

It’s true investing in the airline industry has been a good way to lose money for a long time.

But citing early post pandemic years to make that point feels misleading.

It’s like saying someone drives badly and instead of pointing to their speeding tickets, it’s like pointing out their car is in the shop with body damage… from a falling tree branch.

All travel was shut down for a while and when it opened up business travel was nonexistent. It’s still down and expected to never return to prepandemic. It’s amazing they made any profit in 2023.

Yes, airlines are not highly profitable but pandemic years are a terrible example due to being a weird black swan event.

lotsofpulp · 2 years ago
Complained about on a forum where many work for employers who earn 20%+.
mbesto · 2 years ago
percentage != absolute value

This is like saying walmart isn't highly profitable...you make up for it in volume.

yau8edq12i · 2 years ago
Checked bags aren't cheaper outside the US...
refurb · 2 years ago
Not only that, this law was in place before 1962.
ceejayoz · 2 years ago
That doesn't make it not a loophole.
josefresco · 2 years ago
Related: On my last flight there were so many carry-on bags they ran out of room. They forced the people boarding last to check their carry-on bags. What some people consider a "carry-on" is debatable. The enforcement of carry-on sizing limits seems spotty at best.
romanhn · 2 years ago
This happened on the last 4-5 flights for me, at least. If flying with family, can be a nice "optimization" to pack into carry-ons and check them all in for free, when offered (sometimes when checking into the flight, sometimes at the gate). Interestingly, I had one such full flight where the overhead bins clearly ended up with a ton of free space so perhaps others went with the same strategy.
fransje26 · 2 years ago
> They forced the people boarding last to check their carry-on bags.

For free, I hope?

paholg · 2 years ago
What they describe has happened to me many times. It's always a free gate-check.

Sometimes the bags are unloaded at the gate, sometimes you have to go to baggage claim.

lotsofpulp · 2 years ago
That happens every flight.
jjav · 2 years ago
> On my last flight there were so many carry-on bags they ran out of room.

Not just your last flight, it is now intentional and it happens on just about every flight. They even stopped pretending and now they announce that if you're in the last few boarding groups the space will run out before you get there.

It's just another money grab to get people to pay for earlier boarding to have a chance to keep their stuff.

Back 20-30 years ago this never happened, there was always room for carryons.

renata · 2 years ago
20-30 years ago they didn't charge extra for checked bags so more people did that instead of dealing with the carry-on hassle.
JohnFen · 2 years ago
What I like about airlines charging separately for checked bags is that it means people like myself who don't check bags at all[1] don't have to pay for something we aren't using.

[1] I ship my luggage ahead to my destination through a parcel carrier service. It's a habit I started a long time ago to ensure that my luggage will get to where I'm going in good condition. It also lets me skip one of the things that makes flying unpleasant. Additionally, post-9/11, it brings the benefit of not having to put up with the TSA pawing through it.