Readit News logoReadit News
al_borland · 2 years ago
>Step 1: Enable tap to click

We are very different people. Tap to click is the bane of my existence. I can’t work on a system that has that enabled.

bicepjai · 2 years ago
It’s funny how I cannot live without this feature
daemonologist · 2 years ago
I enable tap to click on those "diving board" style touchpads if I'm going to be using the system for long stretches without a mouse - the amount of force needed and top-to-bottom variability of the diving board drives me nuts. I'd definitely rather have a modern haptic trackpad though.
al_borland · 2 years ago
I never found the diving boards bad, but I think that is due to starting to use trackpads back when they had physical buttons under them, and I never changed my technique. I use my index finger to move around, and my thumb hangs out near the bottom of the pad for when I need to click.

I’m not sure how else I’d do things like a click and drag operation. The whole double tap and drag thing always seemed pretty error prone for me.

behnamoh · 2 years ago
I think people who want more control disable it. It's annoying when it accidentally clicks on things.
uldos · 2 years ago
I just tried to enable it for 10 minutes and I will never enable it again. This is also a reason why I can not work on non mac laptop trackpads - they are unreliable, accident taps happens all the time.
drcongo · 2 years ago
I stopped reading at this point, realising how different this person is from me and how much less likely I am to vibe with any of the other tips.
uldos · 2 years ago
I don't think I can trust someone who suggests installing edge on mac...
dime · 2 years ago
He's a frontend dev, so part of the job. Not everyone has the luxury to write off/skip QA for Edge.
madeofpalk · 2 years ago
Frontend developer. Never tested in Edge.

I primarily develop and use Firefox. Rarely is a cross-browser compat issue reported, but if it does that we can test + fix on the go.

CincinnatiMan · 2 years ago
Edge has native vertical tabs. Killer feature.
outside1234 · 2 years ago
Why? What would you choose? It is actually a pretty good browser.
vinni2 · 2 years ago
Firefox
prepend · 2 years ago
I use it on my Mac and like it ok.

My main browsers are Safari and Brave. Then Chrome for google stuff only. Then Edge. Then Firefox.

I was a primary Firefox for many years and finally gave up about 3-4 years ago when it just got too bloaty and buggy to bother. This might have been when I discovered Brave, but not sure.

Anyway, Edge didn’t seem so weird to me at all.

synergy20 · 2 years ago
job mandates a macbook, had no choice besides changing the job, which I will do later.

one thing bugs me the most, as a linux user, is that copy and paste by mouse middle button, now I have to use mouse to select it, then cmd+v to paste it, what a hassle.

of course I changed that scroll down instead of scroll up thing, I don't want to move up the bar to move down the page, that's just odd.

click to close windows does not really close the apps also bothers me.

Apple is such a closed company nowadays, worse than Microsoft from the past in fact, made me hard to love it, thus those nitpicks becomes issues for me.

prepend · 2 years ago
> Apple is such a closed company nowadays, worse than Microsoft

This may be true. But Windows is so absolutely horrible with ads and stupid bloat.

Even my work windows instance defaults to showing Kardashian/politics “news” on new tabs. My home windows instance has so much garbage installed.

Maybe Microsoft is more “open” but their design is poor and anti-user. I’ll settle for Apple being closed and user focused every day.

Of course, I’d really love a Linux laptop with the price and usability of Apple hardware, but I’ve been wanting that for 25 years.

cmiller1 · 2 years ago
I don't understand what the problem is with the windows!=applications paradigm, I GREATLY prefer it.
samatman · 2 years ago
Some people just want things to work the way they're used to. I'm one of those people, I find it rather annoying to deal with the windowing paradigm used in (most) Linux windows managers and Windows itself. So I'm not surprised when I see it in the other direction.

I do wish it were possible to set up a macOS-flavored version of focus follows mouse, though. It would have to be adapted to the windowing paradigm, but I have some notes on how it could work. I don't expect Apple will ever add it and it would require deep hooks into many parts of the OS to offer it as an extension, so that's that. There's no perfect software, the only question is what you can live with out of the available options.

dieulot · 2 years ago
It’s an additional abstraction.

On Windows/Linux closing an app requires doing the obvious thing. Press the big X, you’re done. You’re back to the previous app instantly.

On Mac after closing a window what you see on the screen is a lie (besides the ever subtle menu bar and shades of gray); you’re still in the visually-hidden app.

whatever1 · 2 years ago
There is absolutely 0 reasons why one would want to have a powerpoint/chrome/photoshop instance without a window.

Calendars, emails, chats that need to run headless in the background live naturally on the top menu bar.

And please spare us from "I want it to open fast". This should not be a user concern, the system should be smart enough to cache frequently used apps.

ajross · 2 years ago
> Apple is such a closed company nowadays, worse than Microsoft from the past in fact

I think that's debatable, the 90's were awful and nothing Apple does right now has the kind of platform dominance MS did. At the height of IE6's reign, there were whole areas of commerce and interaction that could only be done on a Windows machine.

But they're clearly moving in that direction. As we saw two days ago w/r/t the DMA evasion nonsense in Europe, Apple is now willing to pull the same kind of tricks MS was: like killing off browser-based apps (!) to force people onto its proprietary stack.

There's a thread down below about how Safari is better than Chrome. And it might be, but it's clear that from Cook's perspectives standard browsers are ejectable the second you can get people hooked on MacOS/iOS apps.

jwells89 · 2 years ago
The window vs. app distinction is pretty easy to smooth over, just sub out ⌘Q for ⌘W so you’re quitting instead of closing windows.

The extra layer of grouping can actually be pretty nice at times, since it allows the user to for example close or minimize/restore all windows of an application across all monitors and virtual desktops at once, but it does take a bit of a different mental model.

euroderf · 2 years ago
⌘Q is evil, sitting as it does next to ⌘W. Too many disasters.

I disable it / remap it somewhere in System Settings.

corney91 · 2 years ago
...until you need to close a Finder window and you need to remember to use ⌘W because that can't be quit. Then you need to make sure to ⌘-tab past Finder because it will hang around near the top of recent apps until you've switched to enough other apps to push it to the bottom of the list.

If anyone has a way around this I'd love to hear it, but I think it's basically a side effect of apps being allowed to be open without a window and Finder always needing to run, so seems like an inherent part of the MacOS experience.

bitvoid · 2 years ago
> of course I changed that scroll down instead of scroll up thing, I don't want to move up the bar to move down the page, that's just odd.

That's because the scrolling behavior with the mouse is annoyingly tied to the scrolling behavior of the trackpad, where the "natural scrolling" makes sense as a default because it's like you're moving the page up (similar to a phone) with two fingers rather than scrolling.

I hate having to constantly change it in the settings as I'm switching between trackpad and mouse. The settings need to be separated. Just let me have natural scrolling with the trackpad and regular scrolling when I'm using a mouse without needing to open the damn settings app.

beezoo · 2 years ago
There’s a small app called Scroll Reverser which allows you to have a different setting for the trackpad and mouse.

Not sure why we need a separate app for this, but it does work.

dcminter · 2 years ago
The maximised window behaviour is the thing that bugs me the most as a primarily Linux user lumbered with a work-Mac. It's so weird to treat that as being on a different virtual desktop. Better than the Lion days when your second monitor could only show "brushed steel" if you had an app maximised, but not by much.
samatman · 2 years ago
I use Moom, so maximizing a window without setting it to its own space is ctrl-cmd-z-space. Moom does a lot more than that, it's worth checking out, especially if you plug into external monitors as part of your workflow.

With that setup, I'm quite content with full screen putting the window in its own space. It's an affordance I use fairly frequently, in fact. Just not as often as maximizing the window within the space it already inhabits.

jwells89 · 2 years ago
Double-clicking the titlebar should yield a more traditional maximize behavior, except in non-native apps which don’t replicate full native titlebar functionality. For those hovering over the green button with option pressed will show an option for traditional maximize.
euroderf · 2 years ago
> click to close windows does not really close the apps also bothers me.

It closes App Store and System Settings. I wonder why they operate differently.

hanche · 2 years ago
For single window apps it makes sense that closing the window also quits the app. For apps that can have multiple windows I suppose it would make sense for the app to quit when the last window is closed, but that seems less obvious that it should, somehow. One reason: The app might open with no windows, waiting for the user to open a file or something.
twixfel · 2 years ago
I miss highlight/middle click to paste but everything else you listed is fairly arbitrary.
nickjj · 2 years ago
I only use a Mac for work through a company laptop but one thing I recently discovered is the world clock widget which is accessed through your clock.

You can show up to 4 different times besides your local time.

This is really handy to see the time in UTC and other timezones where some of your team mates might exist. This saves having to Google for timezone converters.

atymic · 2 years ago
I find Clocker excellent for this, unified time scroller as well https://apps.apple.com/au/app/clocker/id1056643111?mt=12 (free)
nkristoffersen · 2 years ago
You can actually create multiple widgets of the same type. So as many timezones or cities you want to track you can just keep adding timezone widgets.
nickjj · 2 years ago
Good to know. In my case I happened to need exactly 4 so it worked out with the default set up.

I like the easy access of it, just click your clock and boom in 1 second you have instant access to these.

I even ordered mine based on relative closeness to my time. For example:

My local time is EST.

The extra 4 clock widget has UTC, Poland, India and Australia which are all +X hours ahead of EST in that order.

Bishonen88 · 2 years ago
alternatively one can use an alfred plugin like this one: https://github.com/jaroslawhartman/TimeZones-Alfred. That's what I'm using since a few years
Terretta · 2 years ago
whatever1 · 2 years ago
It is unbelievable how bad window management is at macos.

Specially if you use multiple desktops it's impossible to not kill your workflow with the inconcistencies. You press a dock icon and you have no clue if it will open a new window in the current desktop or if it will switch to another desktop and show you an already open window.

DavideNL · 2 years ago
I use the Contexts [1] app, couldn't live without it (not affiliated...)

It shows me all open Windows and in which Desktop, in its Sidebar (I've disabled the macOS dock.)

Also the Cmd-Tab functionalities are nice, and i can use "Fn + [a single key] " shortcut to focus an app.

Would recommend.

[1] https://contexts.co/

whatever1 · 2 years ago
HOLY COW!

Thank you so much internet stranger!

jwells89 · 2 years ago
I don’t think I’ve ever encountered a program that opens a new window when other windows are already open on some other desktop/monitor. The behavior I always see is switching to the desktop with the window, with multiple dock icon clicks cycling through each desktop that program has windows on.
whatever1 · 2 years ago
You have to remember if there is a window open in any of the desktops, because the dock does not even provide info on this.

It just tells you that it has a program in memory, like it can help my workflow.

Dock in macos is a useless process manager, not a taskbar.

daemonologist · 2 years ago
My window management style changes completely when I switch operating systems - on Windows I use the taskbar (with actual named windows, not just the default icons), because the desktop switching and "overview"/view all windows feature are atrociously laggy. On Mac and Linux (Gnome), as you say, the dock is useless for finding your windows so I make extensive use of desktops and the overview, which both perform flawlessly.
jwells89 · 2 years ago
Virtual desktops on Windows still feel pretty hacked on, don’t they? Hopefully that’s a focus point for Windows 12.

Dead Comment

hakunin · 2 years ago
I used to have fancy long config files full of default writes, but every MacOS update changes so many things that it’s borderline stressful to run the file ever again. Things break in weird ways. The config ends up only being useful for the one time I setup this machine, and not the next.

So my new approach: an Apple note where I just write down any settings I tweak manually in UI. If they ever relocate, I will find them in another place. I also write down any custom setup I do (like cron, etc).

I also keep an iCloud dir of various software configs, and a Brewfile for all the software installs. I haven’t tried transitioning from this setup yet, but hopefully it’s much more straightforward, albeit a bit time consuming (it’s always time consuming).

amardeep · 2 years ago
Just a shout out to nix-darwin[1]. It is nix, so initial setup is a bit involved. But then it truly makes it easy to configure everything in one place including mac defaults, homebrew apps declaratively and mas apps etc.

There is a sample config in nix-darwin repo[2].

[1] https://github.com/LnL7/nix-darwin

[2] https://github.com/LnL7/nix-darwin/blob/master/modules/examp...

bsnnkv · 2 years ago
This is also my favorite way of setting up MacBooks. I love being able to set up all my Linux, macOS and Windows[1] machines from a single flake.

[1]: https://lgug2z.com/articles/managing-dotfiles-on-windows-11-...

behnamoh · 2 years ago
Sounds too much hassle for something you want to come back to every few years, when the nix commands and procedure have changed anyway.
okkdev · 2 years ago
I skip nix-darwin and use just home-manager. Does all I need. Don't really see the point of adding nix-darwin.
dbuxton · 2 years ago
It's such a pain keeping track of all the `defaults write xxx` stuff when Apple updates.

My current setup here in case useful to anyone: https://gist.github.com/dbuxton/3ccdfd88b05e1f2807c05fe32f50...

(If anyone knows how to show bluetooth in top menu all the time on Sonoma I'd love to learn - haven't done much investigation but option seems to have disappeared in the UI...)

OJFord · 2 years ago
I was so glad to remove all that (and to a lesser extent, trying to maintain both Homebrew package names and pacman/AUR names for everything, which obviously sometimes differ or need a different thing anyway) when I started using a Linux machine for work (already did personally). That might change again unfortunately; I'm hoping some day Nix or something like it is a cross-platform solution, but I don't think it's there yet. Discovering the `defaults` options (or worse: what you're setting that no longer does anything) is a nightmare.
mckn1ght · 2 years ago
Can you still drag it from control center to the menu bar? I haven’t upgraded to Sonoma yet so I can’t test it.