This is what JavaScript was supposed to be until Netscape forced the dude to use a C/Java-like syntax.
Readit Newsbehnamoh commented on Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly spritely.institute/hoot/... · Posted by u/AlexeyBrin
behnamoh commented on Show HN: Smooth CLI – Token-efficient browser for AI agents docs.smooth.sh/cli/overvi... · Posted by u/antves
Ironically, the landing page and docs pages of Smooth aren't all that token-efficient!
behnamoh commented on LLMs could be, but shouldn't be compilers alperenkeles.com/posts/ll... · Posted by u/alpaylan
> Specifying systems is hard; and we are lazy.
The more I use LLMs, the more I find this true. Haskell made me think for minutes before writing one line of code. Result? I stopped using Haskell and went back to Python because with Py I can "think while I code". The separation of thinking|coding phases in Haskell is what my lazy mind didn't want to tolerate.
Same goes with LLMs. I want the model to "get" what I mean but often times (esp. with Codex) I must be very specific about the project scope and spec. Codex doesn't let me "think while I vibe", because every change is costly and you'd better have a good recovery plan (git?) when Codex goes stray.
behnamoh commented on Orchestrate teams of Claude Code sessions code.claude.com/docs/en/a... · Posted by u/davidbarker
It's not like he was the only one who came up with this idea. I built something like that without knowing about GasTown or Beeds. It's just an obvious next step
Exactly! I built something similar. These are such low hanging fruit ideas that no one company/person should be credited for coming up with them.
Dead Comment
behnamoh commented on Advancing finance with Claude Opus 4.6 claude.com/blog/opus-4-6-... · Posted by u/da_grift_shift
Anthropic does anything to keep the Claude hype going; from fearmongering ("AI bad, need government regulations") to wishful thinking ("90% of code will be written by AI by the end of 2025" —Dario) to using Claude in applications it has no business being in (Cowork, accessing all your files, what could go wrong?) to releasing "research" papers every now and then to show how their AI "almost got out" and they stopped it (again, to show their models are "just that good") to prescribing what the society should do to adapt to the new reality to doing worthless surveys on "how AI is reshaping economy, but mostly our AI not others".
It would be unpopular in Iran to have a war. If you think otherwise you read too many Enlgish-language diaspora / filtered sources.
As an Iranian, nothing hurts me more than someone outside my country lecturing Iranians about Iran. Vast majority of Persians are waiting for the US and Israel to attack the regime and finish off this mafia that's kept us hostages for half a century.
How well did that work out in Libya?
How about South Korea, Japan, Germany, and France? US military intervention has had really good outcomes in the past, why just cherry pick the bad ones?
I assume that the economic conditions are caused by the sanctions designed to force Iran to give up their nuclear ambitions? But that only works if the country actually cares about its people. Iran seems content to let them suffer (or kill them themselves). Is Iran destined to become the next North Korea? Will their oil save them from that?
> I assume that the economic conditions are caused by the sanctions designed to force Iran to give up their nuclear ambitions?
No, that's the regime's excuse. Most electricity in the country is used by the regime to mine crypto (!).
> It's troubling that most of the free world stands by and watches as a genocidal-level massacre takes place in Iran. Persians don't expect China/Russia to respond, but come on, no action from the West?
I find it surprising that you're troubled. The West helped Israel with its genocide in Gaza; why did you expect that the West would intervene in what's happening the Iran, which by death count is significantly smaller?
> which by death count is significantly smaller
In 48 hours, the islamic regime in Iran massacred more than 40,000 protestors (and left tens of thousands of people blinded/wounded, often "finishing them off" by raiding hospitals...). Some figures even show more than 40,000, but even assuming the low-park, that's 833 people per hour, or 13 people per minute who got killed.
Whatever Israel did (to defend itself) was by no means even near those numbers.