[2015-09] Anne C. Reboul: "Why language really is not a communication system: a cognitive view of language evolution" - , Laboratory on Language, Brain and Cognition (L2C2), Institute for Cognitive Sciences-Marc Jeannerod, Bron, France [1]
> [2013-09] Noam Chomsky: One of the most striking cases of incompatibility, that I know, is the sharp conflict between computational efficiency, and communicative efficiency. Language is just badly designed for communication, but well-designed to be efficient, it seems. [2]
> [2013-09] Noam Chomsky adds: There's a kind of phrase that is sometimes used for this that drives people crazy; "Language is beautiful, but unusable." It's kind of true, you know. Even if people don't like it. [2]
[2022] Nick Enfield: "Language vs. Reality: Why Language Is Good for Lawyers and Bad for Scientists" [3]
> Language cannot create or change physical reality, but it can do the next best thing: reframe and invert our view of the world. In Language vs. Reality, Enfield explains why language is bad for scientists (who are bound by reality) but good for lawyers (who want to win their cases), ... [3]
> [2023-01] Ev Fedorenko: "Although language and thought often go together, they are robustly dissociable." [4]
> [2023-01] Ev Fedorenko: Fallacy 1: "Good at language = Good at thought". Fallacy 2: "Bad at thought = Bad at language". Fallacy 3: "Bad at language = Bad at thought" (emphasis in being judged on how smart you are based on how you say something). [4]
[1] https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10....
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-72JNZZBoVw&t=4493s
[3] https://direct.mit.edu/books/monograph/5472/Language-vs-Real...
Situation: There are N results shown per page. There are N+1 results remaining.
Rigid/simple: The last result is put on a separate page.
Flexible/human: If the last results are within some reasonable threshold then include them on the last page.
The last page is a different context.