Readit NewsI just checked, my bank uses "." as the decimal point, too, instead of the official ",".
For the record, before you down-vote, check the other comments. I am from an European country where we "officially" use "," as the decimal point (so yes, I know it might not be universally true, at least not in theory), yet my bank uses ".", and so do people (many, at least). In IT, it always has been ".", too. Of course in elementary school (>20 years ago) we used "," as the decimal point, FWIW. :P It might still be the practice there.
This isn't anything like a compressor or heatpump system, but Peltiers get a bad rap... they move heat really well if you're not pushing them to the edge.
Here's a nice chart. At 10k difference and 0.1 current max, you're over 2.5 COP. https://www.meerstetter.ch/customer-center/compendium/71-pel...
In a country like Vietnam or Japan (or when applied at an individual level rather than a societal level, each individual weighing whether they actuall need more exercise at the moment) we can get back to the simple assumption of walking requiring extra calories (which you'll eventually eat due to hunger and some sort of weight homeostasis) and just running the numbers (all slightly conservative for "typical" scenarios, favoring beef over gasoline to mildly steelman the argument):
- Beef produces something like 48 lbs of CO2 equivalent emissions per pound
- Beef is something like 1200 calories per pound
- Walking burns something like 90 calories per mile
This directly gives 3.6lb of CO2 equivalent emissions per mile. Under a homeostasis assumption, none is sequestered on average long-term in the person doing the walking, though actual emissions could be slightly higher or lower when taking into account the relative greenhouse impact of human emissions in response to that digestion/exercise (but this is somewhat negligible compared to a cow's methane production).
Even pretty crappy cars in city driving conditions can achieve 20mpg, which is only 1.02lb of CO2 equivalent emissions per mile, 3.5x better.
Most people aren't eating pure beef, but the break-even point (compared to that hypothetical extremely shitty car; the argument favors gasoline even more with more modern vehicles) is 28% of your calorie budget (assuming all other inputs have zero greenhouse impact).
Chicken is better at only 1.6lb of emissions per mile of walking, with a break-even point at 63%. Cheese and butter are _slightly_ better still. Nearly all animal products are much worse than gasoline, and basically any diet made from >=70% animal products (denominated in calories) will have higher emissions than a 20mpg car and driving habit.
If you compare it to more typical cars (my car is dirt cheap, from 2008, and still gets 30mpg city even after 17 years of wear and tear), the break-even point is much worse.
Counter-arguments include that the carbon impact of a car is much higher than just its gasoline consumption, but if you work through the math everything else put together is a rounding error compared to the gas over the lifetime of a vehicle (still 5-15%, but it doesn't substantially impact anything I've said so far).
- A 100g cooked serving of pasta has 131 calories [1] - This random website claims that a 100g serving of pasta generates 0.58 lb CO2 equivalent emissions - To get 90 calories we need ~69g of pasta - This gives 0.4lb CO2e per mile when walking under pasta power
I'm not sure if the CO2 estimation for pasta is using a cooked weight or a dry weight, so I chose the worst-case scenario. If that CO2e number is applied to 100g of _dry_ pasta, the numbers get way better.
1: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/food-details/169728/nutrients 2: https://www.co2everything.com/co2e-of/pasta
Armagetron was roughly contemporary with GLTron, but has a zoomed out perspective that doesn't capture the claustrophobic feeling of not knowing what's on the other side of that trail you're next to. There are also games based on the lightcycle sequences from the newer TRON movies. I have nothing against them, but they're not the same thing.
Seems like an underserved audience might possibly exist for this sort of thing.
Looks like the last release was in 2016, which is a lot more recent than I expected. I wonder if we could dust it off and get a build?
Sunshine is a self-hosted game stream host for Moonlight. Offering low latency, cloud gaming server capabilities with support for AMD, Intel, and Nvidia GPUs for hardware encoding. Software encoding is also available.
And fruits are broader than most people think. Many of the things you think as vegetables are fruits: pumpkins, zucchinis, tomatoes. But even outside fruits there is food you can harvest without harming the plant, like potatoes. And we haven’t even gotten into seeds and grains, like rice.
So you can definitely live without killing what you eat.
That’s like saying you kill chickens to eat eggs. You don’t kill a plant to eat its fruit. In fact, plants benefit from animals eating what they produce, be it oranges or tomatoes or something else and crapping the seeds somewhere else for proliferation.
The numbers in each row (when cols is set to 6) are of the form:
6n+1, 6n+2, 6n+3, 6n+4, 6n+5, and 6n+6
Only 6n+1 and 6n+5 can't be trivially factored:
6n+1, 2(3n+1), 3(2n+1), 2(3n+2), 6n+5, 6(n+1)
So it follows that for any n >= 1, numbers in columns 2, 3, 4, and 6 can never be prime. Fun!