A more cynical take (that I'm inclined towards is): the median software developer is simply not very good. X10 was a good developer; the people on TEAM and TEAM++ were not.
High probability this “discriminatory language” is just someone having a hard time switching pronouns. Listing very minor grievances like this give the letter less weight than it otherwise could have.
Solution for me ended up being: 1) Drinking less as relaxed breathing triggered it 2) Walking long distances while practicing breathing deeply and hill climbing to build cardio and stronger lungs.
After that I had almost no issues, fixed it like a charm. YMMV
You think that the world is full of situations where 80% of the payoff comes from 20% of the work/complexity/whatever?
I tell you that, equally, the world is full of situations where you get 0% of the payoff unless you've done 100% of the work.
That latter observation is just as true as the former, but it won't make anyone into a best-selling business book author or motivational speaker, as it doesn't help with cognitive dissonance reduction when reflecting upon laziness and ineptitude, as Pareto's law does.
Well stated. Deep down I’ve known this to be true, but since Pareto’s law is often over used, it’s easy to lose sight of other aspects of reality. This one is often overlooked.
Judgement must be used to understand how these two concepts can apply to a given situation or decision.
> Can we re-frame this in terms of the customer’s problem?
> What’s the soonest we could get this done?
> What would you need to get this done tomorrow instead of next week?
Well, that sounds like a recipe for high turnover. I know few engineers who would want to work for this kind of low trust boss and they are all bottom of the barrel consultant types. I thought Stripe was doing better than that.