Readit News logoReadit News
taylortbb commented on Signal Secure Backups   signal.org/blog/introduci... · Posted by u/keyboardJones
andrepd · 6 months ago
Any Linux desktop can do that via MTP (Google doesn't allow access as mass storage anymore)
taylortbb · 6 months ago
Doesn't MTP require plugging in a USB cable? KDE Connect works wirelessly as long as your phone and computer are on the same network.
taylortbb commented on US tech tariff exemption may only be temporary, says Lutnick   ft.com/content/9038804f-c... · Posted by u/mraniki
revnode · a year ago
> Who's going to bother to invest in American manufacturing when the tariff "strategy" changes daily?

Isn't that the point? If things are so unstable, you avoid the instability by manufacturing domestically.

taylortbb · a year ago
But then you risk tariff policy changing, and suddenly you're undercut by foreign factories again, and you lose all your investment in the American factory. It still needs certainty that the tariffs are staying.

The uncertainty only works to return manufacturing where America is cost-competitive without tariffs, and that's a tiny slice of manufacturing.

taylortbb commented on British Museum gems for sale on eBay – how a theft was exposed   bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c... · Posted by u/helsinkiandrew
alephnerd · 2 years ago
Fair point!

I guess I was assuming almost $20k a year back then would have been livable back then, like it was for much of the US excluding a handful of cities like NYC or SF at the time.

I think minimum wage was around £9k/yr back then so I assumed 25% above minimum wage was acceptable (not great, but acceptable)

Clearly not though.

taylortbb · 2 years ago
> I guess I was assuming almost $20k a year back then would have been livable back then, like it was for much of the US excluding a handful of cities like NYC or SF at the time.

You're excluding the reasonable comparables. London is the UK's equivalent of NYC or SF.

taylortbb commented on London Drugs closes stores until further notice due to cyberattack   cbc.ca/news/canada/britis... · Posted by u/nvy
betaby · 2 years ago
How 'Procedures to call insurance companies and verify coverage' prevents store shutdown? In my worldview insurance is 'sometimes we pay if ensured event occurs'. Lack or presence of the insurance changes nothing about the attack.
taylortbb · 2 years ago
They're a pharmacy, they get directly reimbursed by customer's drug insurance plans and only charge customers for the uninsured amount. They need to submit prescriptions to insurance, and find out how much insurance is covering, before filling prescriptions.
taylortbb commented on TfL's simple pop-up message led to a significant drop in paper ticket sales   ianvisits.co.uk/articles/... · Posted by u/zeristor
tialaramex · 2 years ago
No, it will work on power reserve, but it won't (logistically can't) work when you have literally run out.

This ought to be incredibly rare, but if you actually do literally run out of battery (not just it gets to the last few percent) then this technology doesn't work, whereas your bank cards do.

taylortbb · 2 years ago
> it won't (logistically can't) work when you have literally run out.

While I believe you're correct for the iPhone, that it won't work, it's actually not as impossible as you suggest. The NFC-capable BlackBerrys that supported the very early tap-to-pay with a phone had the concept of a default card, which could be programmed onto the secure element and would work even if the phone was totally dead (even if the battery was removed). The NFC field was enough power to boot up the secure element, just like it's enough power to run the chip in your bank card when you tap it.

Later phones dropped this support, as it took a bunch of engineering effort and customers largely didn't care. But if customers ever start demanding it, so they can totally stop carrying a bank/credit card, it is possible.

taylortbb commented on More misdrilled holes on 737 MAX in latest setback   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/toomuchtodo
m_a_g · 2 years ago
Why are you including only US airlines for comparing a plane model's safety? That seems very convenient. And even worse you are using other planes data as well.
taylortbb · 2 years ago
> Why are you including only US airlines for comparing a plane model's safety? That seems very convenient

737 MAXs are not identical worldwide. There's a number of optional add-ons, which even discount US airlines will pay for, but emerging market discount airlines will not.

Specifically for the 737 MAX crashes, it was from a faulty AoA sensor. Neither of the crashed planes had the AoA disagree alert option, but all US airlines paid extra for it. It's not something you're supposed to need, hence being an optional extra, but for obvious reasons budgets aren't as tight at North American airlines as discount airlines in emerging markets.

This isn't to say we're guaranteed that an AoA disagree alert would have avoided the problem, it was undeniably a faulty design, but it probably provides an additional layer of safety. There's a reason that when the MAX returned to service it became standard equipment for all MAXs sold.

So, it's not entirely correct to totally exclude planes from other countries. But there is a fair point in putting more weight on similarly configured planes.

taylortbb commented on FAQ on Leaving Google   social.clawhammer.net/blo... · Posted by u/mrled
linkgoron · 2 years ago
Chrome/Chromium was developed for quite a while using Webkit. Chromium was created in 2008 and only after Google had already captured a third of the browser market share (according to Statista) did they fork it (April 2013).

The fact that basically all of the big companies (Microsoft, Google, Apple) use Webkit or Chromium shows that it's very difficult to build and maintain one successfully IMO. I think that Mozilla are essentially the only ones developing something that's somewhat competitive, not to mention that most smaller companies (e.g. Opera, Brave, Vivaldi, Island etc.) all use Chromium.

I'm not saying that it's easy to succeed with a product even after you've bought it, or started it from a fork (see less successful Chromium/Webkit forks). I'm just saying that it was not something built from the ground-up in Google. For example, v8 was and really changed a lot of things in the JavaScript world including Node, Deno etc.

taylortbb · 2 years ago
> Chrome/Chromium was developed for quite a while using Webkit. Chromium was created in 2008 and only after Google had already captured a third of the browser market share (according to Statista) did they fork it (April 2013).

I think you missed the point, there's two forks in the history of Blink (Chromium). Yes, Blink is a fork of WebKit, but WebKit is a fork of KHTML. So it's not like it originated at Apple either, it originated at KDE.

taylortbb commented on OpenBSD KDE Plasma Desktop   rsadowski.de/posts/2024-0... · Posted by u/brynet
Apocryphon · 2 years ago
Just trying to identify what's the Mint/Ubuntu/Zorin/elementary OS equivalent of BSD in terms of ease of use.
taylortbb · 2 years ago
The point is that they're not really comparable. Mint/Ubuntu/etc all ship the same Linux kernel, that's why they're called distros. They're different distributions (distros) of the same software (Linux kernel, etc).

The different BSDs aren't distros, they are different kernels that are developed in parallel. Obviously there's shared history there, and some shared userspace, but FreeBSD and OpenBSD aren't just two different BSD distros of largely the same software.

taylortbb commented on iPhone that fell from hole in Alaska 737 MAX flight is found, still open to Mail   twitter.com/SeanSafyre/st... · Posted by u/wannacboatmovie
photonbeam · 2 years ago
The phones are trackable via gps
taylortbb · 2 years ago
The post says the phone was in airplane mode, and was found by chance as someone walked past it.
taylortbb commented on ESA’s new Ariane 6 rocket passed a major full-scale rehearsal   esa.int/Enabling_Support/... · Posted by u/sbuttgereit
dmoy · 2 years ago
How much cost is there to get a reused stage ready for the next flight? E.g. where does it land on the scale from "replace 30% of the parts due to wear and tear, and do a full disassembly reassembly, saving only 5% of the cost of the booster" to "full up the gas tank like a car and yolo the next ride"?

All I know if is the one tweet from musk years ago that said 90% savings. But ... musk tweets a lot of bullshit so idk

taylortbb · 2 years ago
SpaceX has a median turnaround time between landing and re-launch of about 8 weeks, with some as low as 3 weeks. That includes time for returning the landing platform to port, unloading, payload integration of the new payload, etc, so refurbishment is some fraction of that.

There's no way they're stripping the whole thing down and replacing 30% of parts in that short of a timeframe. Especially given they do it in Florida, and don't bring them back to the factory. So it's hard to say for sure, but the time can give us some sense of what they must be doing.

u/taylortbb

KarmaCake day109March 27, 2015View Original