In real life, many people really do jump in to help when they know help is needed.
In real life, many people really do jump in to help when they know help is needed.
If everyone merely accepts good work silently, but talks about bad work all the time, then political focus within the org will shift to bad teams and bad people. At the extremes I’ve seen this result in the worst people getting promoted to the highest positions because they were infamous. That’s the same as being famous.
Think about Trump: he got elected because nobody could shut up about him, so to a lot of voters didn’t know anything about any other candidate. They voted for the one they recognised.
“He may have his flaws, but he’s not that bad.” is something I’ve heard at work and in the public sphere.
You’re immune to this effect, you’re about to say?
Name five good things that Hillary has done.
- pushing updates to slow down older iOS to "encourage" users to buy a new phone
- starting with the iPhone they didn't even sell official spare parts, and did all they could to make it hard to crack the phones open (proprietary screw, fuck that) to repair them
- lying to consumers about warranty laws, implying their products would be covered only 1y despite european regulations mandating 2y minimum
- getting into cushy mafia-like agreements with phone providers which inundated the market with "cheap" iPhones subsided by non-iPhone subscribers
- using proprietary connectors wherever they can (no ethernet? no jack? FUCK)
- by making it harder to use non-Apple-approved applications on MacOS and making it so applications can't even start when their "approval" server is down?!
- and so much more, just like with every other company
We need tech that empowers people. Private companies and Nation States are building a dystopian nightmare that's the exact opposite of that (we're in a cross-over fanfiction mixing Orwell and Huxley). Apple is certainly part of that.
Apple down older iPhones to make their batteries last longer. They were penalized by court for not communicating this decision to iPhone owners, not for slowing down battery.
You're a mapper, like me. The only reason I ever want to learn details is if they are important corner cases.
>In tech this can be an obstacle when communicating because many engineers have an extremely fine-grained memory, seemingly all the time.
Those folks are packers, they know all the corner cases, and worry incessantly about them.
Google "mappers vs packers" to learn more, far more.
I've also had humbling experiences, particularly one with me going through what I thought was relevant and a very nice tech support lady telling me the equivalent of "but did you make sure you turned it on?", and she was right.
Overloading tier-1 techs with too much information rarely does any good, from my experience.
They were NOT polite. Even if they found nothing wrong.
US immigration is a day at the spa in comparison. Even when the consulate messed up my fingerprints. Cleared up in under two hours, they were cold but polite the entire time - not angry and disrespectful.
After I was finally allowed in Japan, 4 hours after I had arrived - thanks to my uncle, a Japanese citizen - everything went fine. Nice people, spent three months there.
I'd like to visit again, but I'm dreading the immigration experience.
It's called "hostage justice" by critics
Taking this to it's extreme, can't you just buy some property so that you owe 1 million dollars, put that debt into it's own company and then say "sorry, that company is bankrupt, I can't pay".
Is that not what's happening here? I feel like I must be missing something.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2021-07-20/money-...
"It does seem … wrong? Like, obviously, if you run a big company that has big liabilities, you’d like to be able to just get rid of the liabilities. And obviously companies have tried, and there are simple approaches (spin off the assets and leave the liabilities, etc.), and those simple approaches don’t work because generally it is bad for a company to be able to just get rid of its liabilities. It would be weird if there was a cheat where doing it as a Texas two-step merger did work."
I can relate to that as a Latin American working in Europe; in the USA specifically this balance is way easier to find and there are more checks and balances.
My first year here I came from this Humanistic Mindset which is the standard in America as a whole; however being in EU I found out that most of the people run (not are, but run) in this Mechanistic Mindset.
Initially makes sense because when you have a a different background, the best you can do is equalize the communication style.
Someone said something interesting about those differences that relate to the article: In the US the culture is more or less like a salad, where maybe all the ingredients are sliced but more or less you know each one, and the result is something good. In Europe, the culture is more like a soup or a Fundue where differences are below the water but the surface is homogeneous, or all the ingredients are melted together.*
* N.B: I do not have a horse on this race or any preference over another.