Readit News logoReadit News
sandermvanvliet commented on X-Clacks-Overhead   hleb.dev/post/x-clacks-ov... · Posted by u/hleb_dev
sandermvanvliet · a month ago
stackoverflow.com and all stack exchange sites also include X-Clacks-Overhead in the response thanks to yours truly
sandermvanvliet commented on Janet Jackson had the power to crash laptop computers (2022)   devblogs.microsoft.com/ol... · Posted by u/montalbano
tzury · 2 months ago
https://everything2.com/title/7+hertz+-+the+resonant+frequen...

Example (for both functions):

    /* Emits a 7-Hz tone for 10 seconds.

      True story: 7 Hz is the resonant
      frequency of a chicken's skull cavity.
      This was determined empirically in
      Australia, where a new factory
      generating 7-Hz tones was located too
      close to a chicken ranch: When the
      factory started up, all the chickens
      died.

      Your PC may not be able to emit a 7-Hz tone. */

 #include 

   int main(void)
   {
     sound(7);
     delay(10000);
     nosound();
     return 0;
   }

from the comments over there (2002)

sandermvanvliet commented on You can make PS2 games in JavaScript   jslegenddev.substack.com/... · Posted by u/tosh
bigfishrunning · 3 months ago
Why use an LLM to do something that would take exactly the same amount of time and a lot less energy to just do in something like MS paint?
sandermvanvliet · 3 months ago
1. I heard about nano banana and wanted to try it 2. I’m on my phone so no photoshop or whatever
sandermvanvliet commented on You can make PS2 games in JavaScript   jslegenddev.substack.com/... · Posted by u/tosh
mschuster91 · 3 months ago
My photoshop skills are near zero, otherwise I'd have long gone and edited xkcd 2347 [1] to say next to the pillar "Something Fabrice Bellard probably implemented while half asleep just to prove he could do it".

There's a lot of FOSS projects that have something written by him in their dependency chain.

[1] https://xkcd.com/2347/

sandermvanvliet commented on Give Your Metrics an Expiry Date   adrianhoward.com/posts/gi... · Posted by u/adrianhoward
sandermvanvliet · 4 months ago
I think this should be true for many things, or at least have a fixed future date at which you re-evaluate $thing

For example with Architecture Decision Records, put a 6 or 12 month expiry on them and evaluate to see if they can be renewed, should be changed or replaced with something that covers new insights.

Unfortunately that seems a very unpopular thing to do so I’ve never seen it work and companies end up with “we have always done it like this” type practices

sandermvanvliet commented on Building my childhood dream PC   fabiensanglard.net/2168/... · Posted by u/joexbayer
sandermvanvliet · 5 months ago
Looking at those pictures made me realise I could _smell_ it…

Got kicked right in the nostalgia I guess

sandermvanvliet commented on Our European search index goes live   blog.ecosia.org/launching... · Posted by u/maelito
anon191928 · 6 months ago
oh yeah, democracy with actual, real kingdoms (10 of them or how many?) kings and constitutions that gives real rights to king. Const. that actually puts king above law and says "sacrosanct".

what democracy? Yeah some of them have it but not EU and all.

sandermvanvliet · 6 months ago
Most are constitutional monarchies in which the monarch is a head of state with no or very limited political power.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchies_in_Europe

sandermvanvliet commented on ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser   flausch.social/@piegames/... · Posted by u/dredmorbius
al_borland · 10 months ago
Maybe limit the time the AI is allowed to think? In the post it showed the AI thought for almost a minute.

I’ve seen Rainbolt ID an image based on some dirt and nothing else. I’d want to see AI be able to do that before saying it’s a solved problem.

sandermvanvliet · 10 months ago
“This is the gradient of Senegal”
sandermvanvliet commented on How much do you think it costs to make a pair of Nike shoes in Asia?   twitter.com/dieworkwear/s... · Posted by u/taubek
phkahler · 10 months ago
I've always wondered why the supply chain has exponential price increase at each step. The example given (guessed at) is the factory produces the shoe for $12.5 and sells it to Nike for $25. Nike then sells it to Footlocker for $50 and they then sell to a customer for $100. Everyone expects to mark up their costs by about 100 percent. Why is that the case? Even if we say the markup isn't 100 percent, why is it a percentage of cost at all? If the shoe factory can make $12 then why can't Nike and Footlocker both make $12 and retail the shoe for $50?

I'm not saying things should be different, just wondering why it is the way it is. If Footlocker was also selling some cheapo shoe for $50 presumably they do the same amount of work to bring that to the store. Are they only paying $25 for those? Why does it cost half for them to handle a cheaper shoe?

sandermvanvliet · 10 months ago
Isn’t this simply taking advantage of what the market is willing to pay?

u/sandermvanvliet

KarmaCake day648March 25, 2014
About
Staff Engineer at StackOverflow
View Original