Khan forced the employees and investors to continue working and gambling on a company they might not have wanted to continue working for or gambling on. It doesn't really matter that the gamble succeeded in this case.
Khan forced the employees and investors to continue working and gambling on a company they might not have wanted to continue working for or gambling on. It doesn't really matter that the gamble succeeded in this case.
The Mac version has lived through 68K MacOS pre and post System 7, PPC Mac pre and post OS X, x86 Macs pre and post Carbon support and now ARM Macs. After each transition , there was a limited amount of time that you could use the same version and even a smaller amount of time that you would have wanted to.
But the same argument applies that applies to Figma. It’s a professional tool that should help you generate income far greater than the cost
...which is probably the most succinct way of describing where our dear Old Net has gone: swallowed up by the razor-thin margins of the professional creative economy.
A full professional seat is $16 for individual, $55 for organizations and $90 for enterprises. Either price is a nothing burger for a professional tool.
They have had quite a swarm of quakes there over the last couple of weeks, including one that was M7+ around the 20th.
The settlement is notable as having belonged to the Japanese in late 19th and early 20th centuries, who once relocated islanders there. Russian Wikipedia says they were Ainu.
Deleted Comment
An author familiar with the history of AI would have mentioned this instead of glossing it over as "not a learning model"—dismissing a problem-solving technique because it doesn't use regression serves no constructive purpose.
————
We have a faceted search that creates billions of unique URLs by combinations of the facets. As such, we block all crawlers from it in robots.txt, which saves us AND them from a bunch of pointless indexing load. But a stealth bot has been crawling all these URLs for weeks. Thus wasting a shitload of our resources AND a shitload of their resources too. Whoever it is, they thought they were being so clever by ignoring our robots.txt. Instead they have been wasting money for weeks. Our block was there for a reason.
Googlebot has been playing a multiple-choice flash card game on my site for months—the page picks a random question and gives you five options to choose from. Each URL contains all of the state of the last click: the option you chose, the correct answer, and the five buttons. Naturally, Google wants to crawl all the buttons, meaning the search tree has a branch factor of five and search space of about 5000^7 possible pages. Adding a robots.txt entry failed to fix this—now the page checks the user agent and tells Googlebot specifically to fuck off with a 403. Weeks later, I'm still seeing occasional hits. Worst of all it's pretty heavy-duty—the flash cards are for learning words, and the page generator sometimes sprinkles in items that look similar to the correct answer (i.e., they have a low edit distance.)
On the other hand there was a... thing crawling a search page on a separate site, but doing so in the most ass-brained way possible. Different IP addresses, all with fake user agents from real clients fetching search results for a database retrieval form with default options. (You really expect me to believe that someone on Symbian is fetching only page 6000 of all blog posts for the lowest user ID in the database?) The worst part about this one is that the URLs frequently had mangled query strings, like someone had tried to use substring functions to swap out the page number and gotten it wrong 30 times, resulting in Markov-like gibberish. The only way to get this foul customer to go away was to automatically ban any IP that used the search form incorrectly. So far I have banned 111,153 unique addresses.
robots.txt wasn't adequate to stop this madness, but I can't say I miss Ahrefs or DotBot trying to gather valuable SEO information about my constructed languages.