What you're left with is a machine that produces "things that strongly resemble the original, that would not have been produced, had you not fed the original into the machine."
The fact that there's no "exact copy inside" the machine seems a lot like splitting hairs; like saying "Well, there's no paper inside the hard drive so the essence of what is copyable in a book can't be in it"
As I see it, CTOs are responsible for
- Making Build/Buy decisions
- Hiring
- Setting up a culture of learning
- Balancing tech and product priorities
- Setting up delivery processes that work for the team
- And finally for architecture and system design
I feel in that order of priority.
Phaser.GAMES[0].state.getCurrentState().ui.player.addLife()
Is this open source?
If you completely trust your users, that's fine.
As a user, it feels like the race has never been as close as it is now. Perhaps dumb to extrapolate, but it makes me lean more skeptical about the hard take-off / winner-take-all mental model that has been pushed.
Would be curious to hear the take of a researcher at one of these firms - do you expect the AI offerings across competitors to become more competitive and clustered over the next few years, or less so?