You said they should now build foreign campuses. I said they won't because it would dilute their brand. And they could have done so in the US or abroad before this.
What am I missing here?
If only the noble deserve a reasonable state then welcome to hell.
So let's not pretend these institutions are noble
If it's a choice between say Princeton in the US and Harvard outside the US, Princeton will be the choice for many.
"He runs the Internet routers for our company." -> "Your company doesn't run the Internet" -> wtf?
But could you imagine a science that isn't fake but is racist? Does something being real prevent it from being racist? For instance, if there were some connections with your skull and some characteristic, would NPR and the scientific community embrace it?
I think it's a mistake to argue that this kind of thing is both fake and racist, not because it's not fake. But I could imagine a world in which some science could be real and racist. In that case, you'd have to deny reality so it fits your world view. How could science and the laws of the universe not fit my 2025 view of race and culture??
I think its enough to say it's racist and we shouldn't pursue this field of research because of it's morally reprehensible. Consider something like the science behind creating human-animal chimeras. Even if it were real it would still be morally reprehensible.
I prefer amd64 as it's so much easier to type and scans so much easier. x86_64 is so awkward.
Bikeshed I guess and in the abstract I can see how x86_64 is better, but pragmatism > purity and you'll take my amd64 from my cold dead hands.
As for Go, you can get the GOARCH/GOOS combinations from "go tool dist list". Can be useful at times if you want to ensure your code cross-compiles in CI.
Genuine question by the way, I would like an answer.
I think the solution is to artificially build new cities with ideal logistics. Distant cities inevitably draw away housing consumers but by least influential first and are outside each others influence for NIMBYs.