Then what happens after they’re locked in there? Are they processed one by one? Do the math. Even with absurdly optimistic assumptions of one hour per person, eight hours a day, every single day. You’re still talking about more than a year to get through 75,000 people. And that assumes perfect efficiency, no delays, no shortages, no illness.
While all that’s happening, people will get sick, injured, desperate. People will die. And after someone is “processed,” where do they go? Immediately put on a plane and sent back to their home country? Is that realistically happening at scale?
This setup isn’t about processing people. It’s about warehousing them. And when large numbers of people are caged indefinitely under those conditions, deaths get written off as “suicides.”
https://community.notepad-plus-plus.org/topic/27212/autoupda...
Thankfully the responses weren’t outright dismissive, which is usually the case in these situations.
It was thought to be a local compromise and nothing to do Notepad++.
Good lessons to be learned here. Don’t be quick to dismiss things simply because it doesn’t fit what you think should be happening. That’s the whole point. It doesn’t fit, so investigate why.
Most tech support aims to prove the person wrong right out the gate.
The article touches on this by saying Apple is making the baseband/modem hardware now. Something they should have done since day one, and I’m not sure what took them so long. However, it was was clear they didn’t have the expertise in this area and it was easier to just uses someone else’s.
At the end of the day, there'll still be a need for highly skilled technical experts, whatever that job looks like.
> there’ll still be a need for highly skilled technical experts
Two different things.
Yes, many, many software developers will become obsolete in certain industries. It’s already happening. Putting on blinders doesn’t make it go away.
Yes, highly skilled technical experts will absolutely still be needed.
I'm starting to worry I just launched something malicious.
The opposite would be more concerning. If I knew in advance that a service was running on Azure, I might think twice before using it. AWS has strong brand confidence, which arguably makes them the “plumbing” of the internet. Most users don’t care or even think about this anyway.
If AWS doesn’t have a single killer feature that makes everyone want to use them, then yes, they become a Lumen. In that case, their killer feature is reliability.
Calling out any cloud provider’s downtime is poor form. No platform is perfect; all of them experience outages. Cloudflare once mocked another provider for an outage, only to suffer a major one themselves the following week. Karma.
I agree with the point about Bedrock. As an AWS loyalist, I found it underwhelming and never went back to it. That’s a real problem for AWS if they want new products to gain traction.
The article is completely right about one thing. AWS needs a Netlify-style product if it wants to be seen as cool or relevant in this current tech phase. They have something close, but as usual, it’s more complicated than it needs to be.
Should more read the book to get the same powerful benefit you received or stay away from the book?