Tellingly, Reagan’s America is where I really notice cultural growth dying out and trust vanishing.
The liar doesn't necessarily "have" any hats. Again, the assumption that the liar has hats is incorrect because it's relying on an conversational implication, rather than a specific assertion.
The liar could be lying because they have no hats. They could be lying because they have a non-green hat. We cannot conclude E because it's possible that E is not correct.
It does not. All my unicorns fly. There is no assumption that I have a unicorn. There is an assumption, based on the claim but it is not a fact.
The puzzle also assumes that "my" implies there is some ownership (we'll take for granted "my" means "has" for simplicity), which is another quibble that unravels the whole thing.
E is correct. I don't see how A comes to be the accepted answer.
"All my hats are green" is still false even when I own a red hat and a green hat.
Likewise, when you hear a word for the first time suddenly you hear it five times in a row. Or if you see somebody once you suddenly start running into them all over the place.
It's because it's cheaper to repeat past realities than to create new ones.
I wonder if this was supposed to be Nine Angels. Copy editing on the web is so sloppy that I'm going to assume so because it makes more sense (to me).
Wow, neo-nazis are a fun bunch. Their ideas about accelerationism and trying to induce race riots have got to be our biggest semi-organized domestic threat. It's encouraging to see authorities seemingly beginning to catch on to this, as well as widespread recognition of what swatting is. Five years ago was a very different story, especially on the latter.
I'm going to assume that wired got it right and it's the neo-nazis that misspelled it; it's much funnier that way.