That said - i WISH people would embrase the existing GraphDatabases more and make the hosters support them as standard, rather than abusing existing relational databases for graph purposes.
And to make it clear,i'm not talking about my own experimental one, i mean stuff like Neo4j, OrientDB etc.
In my experience, the vast majority of graphs can be embedded in relational databases just fine and most people don't want general graph querying. People just don't like optimizing queries (or equivalently the schema to enable such queries).
I personally have never seen a pitch for graph databases that makes them seem attractive for more than data exploration on your local machine.
The author clearly mentioned that they want to work in the relational space. Choosing Mongo would require refactoring a significant part of the codebase.
Also, databases like MySQL, Postgres, and SQLite have neat indexing features that Mongo still lacks.
The author wanted to move away from a client-server database.
And finally, while wanting a 6.4TB single binary is wild, I presume that’s exactly what’s happening here. You couldn’t do that with Mongo.
Edit: ok the other guy mentioning mongo is clearly being sarcastic
Totally willing to believe I’m just naive about this; I don’t see what “bull market vs. bear market” has to do with the running of the bulls festival.
Here is one of many:
https://media.gallaudet.edu/channel/Videolibrary+Archive/158...
Haters will say dis/misinformation makes it not worth it, but i simply point out that it's the truly stupid people who speak the loudest and you need to look deeper. There's no going back to a world where for-profit media is above critique. The relentless violence in palestine firmly endorsed and enabled by western media has pretty much destroyed any faith I had that our for-profit media is capable of self-regulation. Dunking on these morons is a public good.
What we really need to figure out is a way to systemically encourage punching up, not down.