Which one would that be??

I think this is the first time I've understood zero-knowledge communication.

Of all the areas of "consumer harm" online my point is for some reason THIS issue with Apple is the key issue they are going after. My guess is this is actually a "business harm" case - ie, scum bags like Match / Facebook with disrupted businesses now doing some kind of alliance to stir the pot and get action (the law is for the rich not the poor).

This is after Apple showed up the DOJ with app store rules that frankly should apply everywhere (ease of cancelation / clear subscription terms) as well as tracking rules, payment method rule and login rules that allow for lots more actual privacy and more.

Of the entire internet, with its endless horrors beyond Apple's control, the DOJ has decided to go after a small green patch that users trust. This is more an indictment of the DOJ than anything. Apple's phone market share is small, but the trust / spending on apple are crazy because it's one of the few places online that doesn't just screw you over.

And hey, I've tried to report online fraud issues for businesses I worked with - it's a total joke. The DOJ gives two craps for even totally obvious scams.

Then all the scam calls

Unfortunate suicide rates are up. Blame the school president? I guess some scapegoat must be found.

I'll be honest I had no idea that access to Ethereum is effectively gate-kept by two centralized entities (Infura, Alchemy). I knew there were only one or two true Ethereum full-nodes, but the impact of that never quite clicked.

[edit] By "full node" I meant "archival node."

  only one or two true Ethereum full-nodes