A big stretch from there, to getting people to the Moon.
I'm gonna wait to make a bet on either outcome.
Even computer scientists. Had one come to me, looking for an API for fast data copy in RAM. I asked what he was achieving, he told me. I asked the bus width on the CPU and the clock speed. Told him, that's what it can do. He went away, said he remembered there was a library routine that could do better and he would keep looking. I just shook my head.
> Alsup ruled that Anthropic's use of copyrighted books to train its AI models was "exceedingly transformative" and qualified as fair use, a legal doctrine that allows certain uses of copyrighted works without the copyright owner's permission.
Or even, is an individual operating within the law as fair use, the same as a voracious all-consuming AI training bot consuming everything the same in spirit?
Consider a single person in a National Park, allowed to pick and eat berries, compared to bringing a combine harvester to take it all.
I think GPS is essential. Tie it to a location - if stolen, it won't operate. Then a way to text you if it is moved outside the designated area. Telling you where it is.
At that point, I suppose it would still be worth stealing just for the battery? A hard problem to solve.