Readit News logoReadit News
dymk commented on Wall Street sees AI bubble coming and is betting on what pops it   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/simonpure
infecto · a day ago
But they also did not create the same amount of value that AI is. Certainly there is hype but also value is being generated.
dymk · a day ago
While I welcome the places where it is bringing value, I’m more worried about all the places it’s being shoehorned in that are a waste of money, fueling the bubble. The blast radius is going to be spectacular.
dymk commented on Wall Street sees AI bubble coming and is betting on what pops it   bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/simonpure
schnebbau · a day ago
We could go back to crypto and NFTs being the capital darlings?
dymk · a day ago
Those did not suck up nearly the capital and attention that AI is. They were like GameStop and AMC.
dymk commented on If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes?   english.elpais.com/techno... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
philipallstar · a day ago
If everything's automated then you don't need taxes to pay people.
dymk · a day ago
Let me know when we live in The Culture, but I’ve got a feeling fully automated luxury gay space communism is a long ways off
dymk commented on If AI replaces workers, should it also pay taxes?   english.elpais.com/techno... · Posted by u/PaulHoule
renewiltord · a day ago
Basic income doesn’t do anything. We already have food stamps and so on. The largest sector of US federal spending is health and social welfare. We’d have to end pretty much all those programs to run a minuscule basic income.
dymk · a day ago
That’s a matter of where you get your taxes from. Plenty of corporations can afford to pay a more fair share. And studies on basic income have so far shown it to be effective.
dymk commented on Willison on Merchant's "Copywriters reveal how AI has decimated their industry"   simonwillison.net/2025/De... · Posted by u/planckscnst
simonw · 2 days ago
The purpose of disclosure is to allow people to make their own decisions about how trustworthy I am as a source of information.

If I started rejecting access to early models over a desire to avoid conflicts of interest my coverage would be less useful to people. I think most of my regular readers understand that.

I was responsible for one of the first widely read reports on the ethics of model training back in 2022 when I collaborated with Andy Baio to cover Stable Diffusion's unlicensed training data: https://waxy.org/2022/08/exploring-12-million-of-the-images-...

Calling me "their most enthusiastic shill" is not justified. Have you seen what's out there on LinkedIn/Twitter etc?

The reason I show up on Hacker News so often is that I'm clearly not their most enthusiastic shill.

dymk · 2 days ago
This is a disappointing thread to find - HN is usually a little more thoughtful than throwing around insults like "insufferable AI cheerleader".

If I can provide a different perspective, I find your writing on LLMs to be useful. I've referenced your writing to coworkers in an effort to be a little more rigorous when it comes to how we use these new (often unintuitive) tools.

I think the level of disclosure you do is fine. Certainly a better effort at transparency than what most writers are willing to do.

dymk commented on Willison on Merchant's "Copywriters reveal how AI has decimated their industry"   simonwillison.net/2025/De... · Posted by u/planckscnst
jaccola · 2 days ago
People doing jobs with no inherent value still need food, shelter, healthcare,… all provided by other people. Further, the cost difference (for there must be a cost difference or we wouldn’t have anyone choosing AI) must come from somewhere, that money is not being used to pay people (or even the same person) doing productive work.

I can see some limited scenarios in up and coming industries or strategically important industries where government job programs could be at least argued for.

The copywriting industry is clearly not either of those.

dymk · 2 days ago
Clearly those jobs have "inherent value", or The Market would not have sunk a few billion into automating away the people that do them. These are jobs that people have been doing for years, and been getting paid money to do.

Look at how things went for the "Learn to code" workforce. They were told that software would be a valuable skill to have, and sunk a lot of time and money into fronted coding bootcamps. The job market in 2025 looks very different with Sonnet 4.5, which is particularly good at frontend code. What skills would you tell all those copywriters to go re-train in? How confident are you that won't be useless in 10, 15 years? Maybe you can say that they should have trained in other fields of software, but hindsight is 20/20.

I am not saying automation is bad, or that the jobs we have today should be set in stone and nothing change. But, there will be society level ramifications if we take some significant fraction of the workforce and tell them they're out of a job. Society can absorb the impact of a small fraction of the workforce going out of a job, but not a big one.

dymk commented on Willison on Merchant's "Copywriters reveal how AI has decimated their industry"   simonwillison.net/2025/De... · Posted by u/planckscnst
constantcrying · 2 days ago
Having jobs for the sake of having jobs is a ridiculous proposition. Copywriting is largely obsolete. Sure, it sucks to be in that profession right now, but what alternative is there. A Machine does your job far cheaper than you and even right now it is "good enough" to replace everything but the most complex and demanding writing.
dymk · 2 days ago
Government job programs were a defining feature of economic prosperity during the New Deal. Saying jobs for the sake of jobs are bad isn’t historically true.

Deleted Comment

dymk commented on Rivian Unveils Custom Silicon, R2 Lidar Roadmap, and Universal Hands Free   riviantrackr.com/news/riv... · Posted by u/doctoboggan
iambateman · 5 days ago
it seems like car-makers themselves feel burdened to make their own self-driving tech, as opposed to outsourcing the software to a third party.

Dell and HP don’t make operating systems…it seems like having a handful of companies focused on getting the self-driving part right without the need to also specialize in manufacturing would be beneficial.

My first inclination was to be bullish on Rivian, and there’s no question that their vehicles are beautiful. But is there anything to suggest they have an advantage over Tesla or other automakers when it comes to self-driving?

dymk · 5 days ago
They could have a better driving assistance package than 99% of other cars on the road for 1/10 the price by using OpenPilot as the LKAS, or installing a Comma in the car.

Real shame nobody has taken that approach, not even a fork

dymk commented on McDonald's pulls AI Christmas ad after backlash   bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c... · Posted by u/mindracer
classified · 6 days ago
An old adage says, there is no such thing as "bad PR".
dymk · 5 days ago
The old adage is dumb, of course there is bad PR, that’s why people hire PR firms to begin with

u/dymk

KarmaCake day8896February 26, 2013
About
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/dymk; my proof: https://keybase.io/dymk/sigs/TjbfqGibzns4Tw1KLpkMtQIF9DuwOQqU1hzg0YbiuRE ]

email: dymk (at) dymk (dot) co

woodworking: https://www.longtailwoodcraft.com/gallery.html

View Original