I’ve migrated a lot of projects from fossil to git eventually, but I dare say they never would have made it that far, had I started out with more friction, including fighting vcs tools.
Just the other day I was starting an exploratory project, and thought: I'll just use git so I can throw this on github later. Well, silly me, it happened to contain some large binary files, and github rejected it, wanting me to use git-lfs for the big files. After half an hour of not getting it to work, I just thought screw it, I'll drop everything into fossil, and that was it. I have my issue tracker and wiki and everything, though admittedly I'll have some friction later on if I want to share this project. Not having to deal with random git-lfs errors later on when trying to merge commits with these large files is a plus, and if I ever want to, I can fast-export the repo and ingest it into git.
So I believe their testing method is quite accurate.
I wrote this article a few weeks ago after discovering that a well known air quality monitor in the market that retails for more than USD 1000 actually uses a PM module that costs less than USD 20.
Often people assume that the more expensive, the better but as you can see in the article this is often not the case -especially when it comes to the accuracy of the monitor.
If you are looking for an open source / open hardware air quality monitor kit that uses high quality sensor modules and is very easy to assemble, have a look at the project we maintain. Instructions to built an indoor monitor [1], instructions to built an outdoor monitor [2] and overview of the kits [3]. All is open source (firmware, schematics, 3d files for enclosure, etc).
[1] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/di...
[2] https://www.airgradient.com/open-airgradient/instructions/di...