Readit News logoReadit News
ageedizzle commented on Attention Media ≠ Social Networks   susam.net/attention-media... · Posted by u/susam
cloverich · 22 days ago
reddit lacks consistent moderation and the worst is location based subreddits, where all dissenting takes are effectively hidden.

Yet one can imagine a limited set of filters that could in theory fix this:

    - eliminate obvious bots
    - eliminate low content / metoo / naysaying
    - eliminate memes
    - detect and promote high quality controversial posts equally to unilaterally upvoted ones

And perhaps let subreddits conditionally opt in or out of each of ^, but have to declare which. We know at least half of ^ is easy, and now LLMs open new doors to potentially new automations, but its likely not cost effect yet.

still i suspect the largest barrier is merely that all the popular social media sites are actively captured by ad-driven development / leaders. That cant last forever, people are sick of it.

ageedizzle · 21 days ago
> still i suspect the largest barrier is merely that all the popular social media sites are actively captured by ad-driven development / leaders. That cant last forever, people are sick of it.

This is why it's a good idea to make the switch to federated alternatives like Lemmy/Piefed. The more people who do this the more people will see it as a viable alternative, making it easier to get away from the ad-driven model of social media.

ageedizzle commented on Attention Media ≠ Social Networks   susam.net/attention-media... · Posted by u/susam
rsolva · 22 days ago
I would like to see social networks that facilitates real life, face-to-face encounters to a much larger extent that the current state of affairs. The Fediverse has the pieces to this puzzle, but I do not know of one project that combines them in the right way yet. We do have Mobilizon for events, we have Mastodon and all the other similar projects for sharing and commenting, but we need something that puts the pieces together in a new configuration.

I do think projects like Bonfire is onto something. I will set up an instance to explore the details sometime this year, when time permits it.

But converting online chance encounters into actual meet-ups, social gatherings and dates is where we should be heading. It would be really nice to have this in a space without ads and the influence of the large corporations!

ageedizzle · 21 days ago
What sets Bonfire apart from other federated social media networks?
ageedizzle commented on Loops is a federated, open-source TikTok   joinloops.org/... · Posted by u/Gooblebrai
bee_rider · 21 days ago
On one hand, it seems impossible to supplant with Tik Tok without the engagement bait. On the other, replacing the additive sites with something just as addictive seems pointless. It is a tricky puzzle.
ageedizzle · 21 days ago
It's not necessarily the case that Loops is just as addictive as TikTok. Because TikTok is more than just short term videos. It's also a recommendation algorithm that slurps up as much information as it can about you to predict what you'll want to watch next. This recommendation algorithm plays a big role in making TikTok addictive. And as far as I'm aware, Loops does not have this functionality. It will just show you videos based on a much simpler algorithm that takes into account how recent a video is and how many likes/comments it has, or something like that, which will make it less addictive.
ageedizzle commented on The AI Revolution in Coding: Why I'm Ignoring the Prophets of Doom   codingismycraft.blog/inde... · Posted by u/mmphosis
mikert89 · 2 months ago
its not even a prediction anymore, meaningful amounts of software engineering are already automated. really dont understand the point of these posts. its just people that are bad at using the tooling
ageedizzle · 2 months ago
> its not even a prediction anymore, meaningful amounts of software engineering are already automated.

I hear claims like this a lot, but I never see anything to back it up. Do you have any evidence that this is actually the case?

ageedizzle commented on Dead Internet Theory   kudmitry.com/articles/dea... · Posted by u/skwee357
therobots927 · 2 months ago
That’s why we need a parallel internet.
ageedizzle · 2 months ago
What safeguards would be in place to prevent this parallel internet from also, with time, becoming a dead internet?
ageedizzle commented on University of Cambridge Cognitive Ability Test   planning.e-psychometrics.... · Posted by u/indigodaddy
anonym29 · 7 months ago
>IQ has a lot of flaws, not the least of which is its usage outside of academic research, as a measure of job aptitude and hiring potential

Isn't IQ one of the best predictors of job training success, across both civilian and military, blue collar and white collar?

It's also one of, if not the single most generalizable predictors that we know of right now, even more so than nationality, race, gender, SES (socioeconomic status), parental SES, you name it. It predicts just about everything - from hard biological measures like reaction time and brain mass to lifetime odds of being in a car accident (distinct from causing a car accident - higher IQ people are statistically less likely to be hit by another driver), divorce rates, lifetime income, longevity, the list goes on and on. IQ is not the strongest predictor for every one of these, but every stronger predictor for any one of those fails to predict as many things as IQ does. Parental SES, controlling for IQ, provides no predictive power for your reaction time, for instance, despite predicting educational attainment better than IQ does.

The critique that IQ is an imperfect proxy for g is totally valid.

The self-assuaging fantasy that g itself doesn't exist is a classic example of a psychological defensive mechanism of rejection, one rooted in a need to defend a worldview that holds all people as inherently equal, when we're measurably, biologically not.

ageedizzle · 7 months ago
> The self-assuaging fantasy that g itself doesn't exist is a classic example of a psychological defensive mechanism of rejection, one rooted in a need to defend a worldview that holds all people as inherently equal, when we're measurably, biologically not.

I think this statement conflates two different senses of the word “equality”. Equality of abilities is different from moral equality. It is perfectly coherent to accept that people aren’t equal in terms of their abilities but are still morally equal. For example, just because Person A is smarter than Person B it does not follow that the interests of Person A matter more than those of Person B, or that the suffering of Person A matters more than the like suffering of Person B, etc. So the view that g is real and people have different IQ scores is consistent with the idea that all people are inherently equal. Because in most contexts the concept of inherent equality is not a biological or psychological concept but a moral concept.

u/ageedizzle

KarmaCake day8August 31, 2025View Original