What is the impact of the “Boriswave” immigration policy on the economy, I wonder?
I’m trying to figure out if you’re asking a leading question and if so, in which direction…
Readit Newsabm53 commented on Brexit Hit to UK Economy Double Official Estimate, Study Finds bloomberg.com/news/articl... · Posted by u/donohoe
It's pretty funny that there are people in this thread pretending like "price discovery" is a real thing that happens in markets based on information. We've all seen Dogecoin and BBBYQ. The emperor has no clothes.
We could make the distinction between price discovery, i.e. what price are people currently willing to buy and sell at (short-term) vs value discovery (long-term).
It's hard to find good data sources for this, especially that StackOverflow is in decline[1].
IEEE's methodology[2] is sensible given what's possible, but the data sources are all flawed in some ways (that don't necessarily cancel each other out). The number of search results reported by Google is the most volatile indirect proxy signal. Search results include everything mentioning the query, without promising it being a fair representation of 2025. People using a language rarely refer to it literally as the "X programming language", and it's a stretch to count all publicity as a "top language" publicity.
TIOBE uses this method too, and has the audacity to display it as a popularity with two decimal places, but their historical data shows that the "popularity" of C has dropped by half over two years, and then doubled next year. Meanwhile, C didn't budge at all. This method has a +/- 50% error margin.
[1]: https://redmonk.com/rstephens/2023/12/14/language-rankings-u... [2]: https://spectrum.ieee.org/top-programming-languages-methodol...
Perhaps the best source would now be the statistics of LLM queries, if they were available.
Edit: I see they raise this point at length themselves in TFA.
abm53 commented on What happens when coding agents stop feeling like dialup? martinalderson.com/posts/... · Posted by u/martinald
Here's the thing. Those first two things don't exist.
I'm revisiting this comment a lot with LLM's. I don't think many HN readers run into real life mudball/spaghetti code. I think there is a SV bias here where posters think taking a shortcut a few times is what a mudball is.
There will NEVER be a time in this business where the business is ok with simply scrapping these hundreds of inconsistent one off generations and be ok with something that sorta kinda worked like before. The very places that do this won't use consistent generation methods either. The next person to stare at it will not just rerun the LLM because at that time the ball will be so big not even the LLMs can fix it without breaking something else. Worse the new person won't even know what they don't know or even what to ask it to regenerate.
Man I'm gonna buy stock in the big three as a stealth long term counter LLM play.
I've seen outside of SV mudballs and they are messes that defy logical imagination. LLM's are only gonna make that worse. Its like giving children access to a functional tool shop. You are not gonna get a working product no matter how good the tools are.
I’d go further than the other reply: not only do those first two things definitely exist, they probably represent the plurality of programming tasks.
abm53 commented on DeepMind and OpenAI win gold at ICPC codeforces.com/blog/entry... · Posted by u/notemap
I understand what you're saying. However I'm not sure it's that germane when we're talking about whether or not the current $200 subscription fee is actually delivering value for money, or whether AI giants are manipulating performance to gain marketing points.
I assume the original reply was addressing the “never” in this specific point:
“The fact is most ordinary mortals never get access to a fraction of that kind of power”
10 USD?
how does this compare to asciiflow.com which is free and open-source?
The most obvious difference (and one worth much more than $10 to me) is that one is native and the other is not.
I read AI coding negativity on Hacker News and Reddit with more and more astonishment every day. It's like we live in different worlds. I expect the breadth of tooling is partly responsible. What it means to you to "use the LLM code" could be very different from what it means to me. What LLM are we talking about? What context does it have? What IDE are you using?
Personally, I wrote 200K lines of my B2B SaaS before agentic coding came around. With Sonnet 4 in Agent mode, I'd say I now write maybe 20% of the ongoing code from day to day, perhaps less. Interactive Sonnet in VS Code and GitHub Copilot Agents (autonomous agents running on GitHub's servers) do the other 80%. The more I document in Markdown, the higher that percentage becomes. I then carefully review and test.
I am also constantly astonished.
That said, observing attempts by skeptics to “unsuccessfully” prompt an LLM have been illuminating.
My reaction is usually either:
- I would never have asked that kind of question in the first place.
- The output you claim is useless looks very useful to me.
abm53 commented on · Posted by u/NomDePlum
abm53 commented on A Map of British Dialects (2023) starkeycomics.com/2023/11... · Posted by u/gregorvand
The names of dialects aren't super useful to people who aren't from the UK. Also, dialects often are continua, so drawing borders without any sort of hierarchy to indicate closeness is quite pointless.
What would be cool if one could click on each dialect/region and hear a few words spoken in that dialect.
I agree.
In my view many of these small regions (that blend into one another) could be combined to give a much more useful map with more sharply distinct accents.
Such a map may be less precise, but far more useful to most.