Readit News logoReadit News
Err_Eek commented on EU opens child safety probes of Facebook and Instagram, citing addictive design   techcrunch.com/2024/05/16... · Posted by u/amalinovic
can16358p · 2 years ago
I don't get how exactly this is measured though. For many app projects, keeping the user in the app is obviously one of the most important metrics, especially for free apps (hence more ads to show and more money to make).

Many UX patterns are fine tuned to keep people in more, which is perfectly understandable as the primary goal is to keep the user in.

Now, who defines "addictive" using which aspect? And even if it is defined, how are they going to outlaw "addictive design"? Blocking UX patterns? Imposing a limit on how quick a user can swipe to next content (which would do more harm than good in general)? Limiting displayed relevant recommended content at the end of content (again, more harm than good in general)?

Don't want to play devil's advocate here but it's not the apps'/platforms' fault here, but parents' fault.

Sugar is addictive. Do we ban sugar, or regulate its consumption? No! Instead we educate parents to limit their childrens' sugar intake.

Parents need to be educated the same way about addictiveness of social platforms and limit their children's usage, but they are probably perfectly okay with status quo as giving a tablet to a kid "snoozes" them for hours so the parent can do whatever they want without interacting with their children, which is wrong in the first place.

I do not work for any big social media platform nor benefit from them, but stop blaming successful social media platforms that have mastered UX optimization, for stupid parents' actions that cause their children to get addicted.

Educate the parents instead to spend more right time with their children.

Err_Eek · 2 years ago
> Educate the parents instead to spend more right time with their children.

This is kind of assuming that the parents have full control over the lives of their children. Which:

a. Isn't true b. Shouldn't be true (because some parents are bad)

As a parent you go to work for 8+ hours per day. During that time your child is in the care of "society" (school / daycare / whatever). And during that time the only thing that protects them is laws and regulations.

Err_Eek commented on Washington's Lottery forced to pull site after creating AI porn of lotto user   mynorthwest.com/3956403/r... · Posted by u/docdeek
edgyquant · 2 years ago
Why do they need to be state controlled for this? This is the same argument for casinos but states don’t run those.
Err_Eek · 2 years ago
> This is the same argument for casinos but states don’t run those.

In most (or at least a lot of) countries states regulate casinos _so much_ than it becomes almost a technicality that casinos are privately owned.

Also with lotteries you have the scale factor -- in order to have an attractive lottery, you need a ton of ticket buyers, so if you have a national level lottery you can definitely make neighborhood lotteries way less appealing.

Blackjack and poker tables don't scale the same way.

Err_Eek commented on You've Been Thinking About Inflation All Wrong (2022)   ofdollarsanddata.com/youv... · Posted by u/thunderbong
Err_Eek · 2 years ago
... I haven't been thinking about inflation

...

But less jokingly, "you're wrong about X"/"you're doing X wrong" is quite clickbaity

Err_Eek commented on Create More, Consume Less (2021)   omaritani.com/blog/create... · Posted by u/artomweb
Zambyte · 2 years ago
Why do you think it's "severe"?
Err_Eek · 2 years ago
imagine a writer writing more books than they read.

imagine a film director directing more movies than they watch.

imagine a software engineer writing more code than they read.

imagine a musician writing more songs than they listen to.

... etc etc

Err_Eek commented on Young people are flocking to astrology   washingtonpost.com/lifest... · Posted by u/bookofjoe
keiferski · 3 years ago
Dawkins [1] and Hitchens’ works on religion are pop-science/culture books, not serious academic studies. Virtually no scholars in philosophy, religious studies, etc. agree with the narratives they present.

Instead, I would read Taylor, Robert Bellah’s Religion in Human Evolution, and maybe Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morality.

1. His non-biological work, that is.

Err_Eek · 3 years ago
(As an atheist who found The God Delusion to be one of the most important books I've ever read, as it gave me a solid framework of arguing in what I already considered to be true)

It's okay to read more digestible books, and not serious academic studies. In fact it's more than okay -- in order to understand an academic study you likely need to do a lot of reading on the topic before hand. A pop sci/culture book is very self contained. I can assure you that very few people in the world can read The Genealogy of Morals and understand much of it without having read a significant amount of philosophy before.

Personally, I read Thus Spoke Zarathustra before reading The God Delusion. I can't remember much of the Nietzsche book, but The God Delusion's arguments are forever etched into my brain. It doesn't matter if I didn't get the Russell's teapot argument from a primary source, it matters that I got it.

Err_Eek commented on Probability and Markets [pdf]   janestreet.com/static/pdf... · Posted by u/max_
antegamisou · 3 years ago
For the experts in the thread complaining about the simplicity of the excellent introductory text in the OP, here's an exciting reading for you:

    Statistical Consequences of Fat Tails: Real World Preasymptotics, Epistemology, and Applications by Nassim Nicholas Taleb
https://www.amazon.com/Statistical-Consequences-Fat-Tails-Pr...

Beware that it may be way more advanced than what you'd expect though.

Err_Eek · 3 years ago
Personally -- I couldn't get past the first 2 chapters of the book. The notations it introduces are pretty unfamiliar for a newcomer and it quickly becomes really hard to follow. I genuinely would like to hear from somebody who managed to go through the entire book above, and what their main takeaways were (from the chapters that follow the two introductory ones).

The non-technical introduction chapter is pretty easy to follow, and I would recommend reading it.

Err_Eek commented on Mass layoffs and absentee bosses create a morale crisis at Meta   nytimes.com/2023/04/12/te... · Posted by u/pretext
symlinkk · 3 years ago
I honestly don’t understand why VR hasn’t caught on. Every time I let someone try my Quest for the first time their minds are blown. It’s very cool technology and seems like the next logical step for video games.
Err_Eek · 3 years ago
I was asking myself the same question. The conclusion I came to is that the getting your mind blown phase doesn't keep you coming back again and again -- it's why games like Minecraft/League of Legends have much higher player counts than say The Last of Us, or other certified mind-blowing games.

I have a Quest 2 and a Steam Deck. Definitely my Steam Deck is getting more use, though it's initial "wow" factor was smaller.

Err_Eek commented on Irish police to be given powers over passwords   bbc.com/news/world-europe... · Posted by u/shivbhatt
vzaliva · 5 years ago
Fortunately, nobody has jurisdiction over your brain. They can ask you to reveal the password but they have no way to extracit it from your head. You can always claim you forgot it.
Err_Eek · 5 years ago
Idk, there's ways of making you speak

https://xkcd.com/538/

Err_Eek commented on Just Be Rich   keenen.xyz/just-be-rich/... · Posted by u/kjcharles
herbst · 5 years ago
I think its more than just that. I think less people are interested in actually owning their housing.

For me housing is the least thing i want to worry about, so i gladly rent and simply can fix any problems by calling my landlord who is by law obliged to keep the house in a liveable condition.

Also flexibility, i can move whenever i want without worrying about the value of my house (which in reality likely only looses value)

Err_Eek · 5 years ago
> I think less people are interested in actually owning their housing.

How do you reconcile this impression of yours with the fact that housing prices are shooting up in all major cities, and have been so for decades? Why is this happening if fewer people are actually interested in owning their own housing?

As a sidenote: in my own personal experience housing is the single major issue of all my close friends and family, but it's only an option for a small minority of them. In fact, I have never met a single person who was in the financial position to buy a house/apartment and didn't do so.

Err_Eek commented on George W. Bush is smarter than you (2013)   keithhennessey.com/2013/0... · Posted by u/Tomte
yrimaxi · 5 years ago
It wasn’t really elitist. He was an elite (e.g. refer to his paternal grandfather) with folksy affectations.

But you are right that a person’s actions (and policies in this case) is much more important than whether they happen to say silly things.

Err_Eek · 5 years ago
What I meant is that making fun about how silly he was is elitist, meaning people like John Stewart and Stephen Colbert did nothing to help the liberal cause.

George Bush himself does indeed come from political royalty, which is why he did his best to present himself as the exact opposite, an average person.

u/Err_Eek

KarmaCake day90February 9, 2017View Original