Readit News logoReadit News
can16358p commented on Wildthing – A model trained on role-reversed ChatGPT conversations   youaretheassistantnow.com... · Posted by u/iamwil
can16358p · 7 hours ago
Not sure how to get it to work. When I open the page there's an empty box at top left resembling an incoming message but without any message.

I also tried sending a "hello" message anyway, and after it, another completely empty incoming message was added.

Am I missing something obvious?

can16358p commented on Pixel 10 Phones   blog.google/products/pixe... · Posted by u/gotmedium
can16358p · 4 days ago
Hardware: looks nice. Software: big NO. Anything from Google is a red flag for me.

If there was a hypothetical phone with this hardware with iOS, that would be really nice.

can16358p commented on Launch HN: Reality Defender (YC W22) – API for Deepfake and GenAI Detection   realitydefender.com/platf... · Posted by u/bpcrd
can16358p · 5 days ago
But can't the bad actors use the same APIs to ensure that it's passing this first?
can16358p commented on Show HN: NextDNS Adds "Bypass Age Verification"    · Posted by u/nextdns
can16358p · 7 days ago
Speak for yourself please.

No one can dictate who can watch something or not.

can16358p commented on A mind–reading brain implant that comes with password protection   nature.com/articles/d4158... · Posted by u/gnabgib
randcraw · 8 days ago
And I'm sure it will improve as the electrode placement and NN is optimized. Accuracy also may improve if the speaker can learn to slow their 'speech' and perhaps add brief gaps between words.

I wonder if trying to enunciate distinctly would help?

Its potential to recognize such a large range of words is also encouraging. That implies the signal is quite rich yet deconvolvable.

can16358p · 7 days ago
Agreed. It's fascinating to think about (no pun intended) where this could go, but also I can't keep myself imagining a world where this tech is ubiquitous and everyone's wearing those casually and it's all "cloud" connected and how it can be weaponized against users by governments and TLAs.
can16358p commented on A mind–reading brain implant that comes with password protection   nature.com/articles/d4158... · Posted by u/gnabgib
can16358p · 8 days ago
TBH 74% accuracy is quite impressive for a device that "reads thought sentences".
can16358p commented on What makes you still work for Meta, when it's clear how toxic the company is?    · Posted by u/camillomiller
herbst · 9 days ago
That's the most American comment. Inventing a 2 party idea when there is none and justify their positions based on that.
can16358p · 8 days ago
I'm not American but... That's why I explicitly stated if I were to work for one of them.

As in a hypothetical scenario where someone pointed a gun at me and told me to pick one of them to work for.

Otherwise there many better and worse options.

can16358p commented on What makes you still work for Meta, when it's clear how toxic the company is?    · Posted by u/camillomiller
JKCalhoun · 9 days ago
I take it your answer then is, "There are worse places you could be working."
can16358p · 8 days ago
Sure there are worse and there are better options than both.

I just relatively compared the two companies in context in my opinion.

can16358p commented on What makes you still work for Meta, when it's clear how toxic the company is?    · Posted by u/camillomiller
rbanffy · 9 days ago
Sure. Between Meta and DOGE or the ICE, Meta seems the lesser evil. OTOH, why work for someone evil at all? Aren’t enough jobs out there with ethical organisations that prioritise, or otherwise favour, common good?
can16358p · 8 days ago
That was just a thought experiment for comparison.

Of course there are much more ethical places to work at.

can16358p commented on A privacy VPN you can verify   vp.net/l/en-US/blog/Don%2... · Posted by u/MagicalTux
can16358p · 8 days ago
Okay I don't have much information about this whole attestation flow and one question boggles my mind. If someone can explain this in simple terms, I'd be thankful:

The post says build the repo and get the fingerprint, which is fine. Then it says compare it to the fingerprint that vp.net reports.

My question is: how do I verify the server is reporting the fingerprint of the actual running code, and not just returning the (publicly available) fingerprint that we get result of building the code in the first place?

u/can16358p

KarmaCake day3828April 28, 2015
About
JS, React, Solidity coder. Design enthusiast, crypto/web3 evangelist.

If I stop responding to your comments it's usually because you aren't worth responding, not because I don't have a counterargument.

Time is precious.

View Original