Readit News logoReadit News
mrandish · 11 days ago
Having just gone through it today, I'm imagining getting this from my shiny new neural interface:

"Due to unusual account activity, you must change your password. Please enter 12 characters with at least three upper case and four lowercase letters, punctuation, two UTF-16 and one unprintable ANSI character.

Error: You may not use any password you've ever used (or imagined) previously. Please try again."

tsumnia · 11 days ago
New College Courses in "Critical Thinking", but they really mean "think of a number between 1 and 10"
Melatonic · 11 days ago
This is awesome - when I first read the headline I totally expected something different.

The user has a password to start or stop the BCI from decoding what they are thinking - this way they have control over what is said out loud or translated. Seems like a no brainer.

jilles · 11 days ago
It very much is a brainer
antegamisou · 10 days ago
So it's still not unsettling to you they came up with something that is actually capable of reading your very private thoughts. You're aware the potentially secondary password protection isn't what made this feasible, aren't you.
Muromec · 11 days ago
So... How fast it will start being used to read thoughts nonconsensually? Military and "law enforcement" always wanted something that isn't torture but gets the information out of people.
randcraw · 10 days ago
Never. It requires several electrodes to be implanted into the patient first. Then there's an adaptation phase in which the patient trains the system. No spy network is going to be able to surreptitiously tap into your thoughts with this. Ever. The signal available outside the skull is way too weak and blurry.
AnonymousPlanet · 10 days ago
What if you make people do the hard part voluntarily by making the device desirable to them? Including a receptor inside the scull. Then you just have to pick up the pieces.

Ever watched Ghost in the Shell?

Lapsa · 9 days ago
you are wrong. tech is already here. recent advance has been application of deep learning to decode bioelectrical field of your brains. it's an ongoing telecom company side business
Gooblebrai · 11 days ago
Not anywhere fast taking into account that it requires invasive surgery of the microelectrodes
inemesitaffia · 10 days ago
You think that's going to stop the CIA if they plan to kill you after anyway?
Lapsa · 9 days ago
thoughts are already being read nonconsensually https://patents.google.com/patent/US3951134A/en perpetrators are even able to communicate back via Frey effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect
musicale · 11 days ago
I assume that's a rhetorical question.

Dead Comment

Dead Comment

sudobash1 · 11 days ago
> When a participant imagined the password ‘Chitty-Chitty-Bang-Bang’ (the name of an English-language children’s novel) the BCI recognized it with an accuracy of more than 98%.

I wonder how difficult having a conversation about that novel (or film) would be. I imagine you would accidentally start saying your thoughts out loud.

pvtmert · 10 days ago
you could set your password something like "hey siri", which essentially is a keyword to wake siri up.

not often but sometimes, siri wakes up on it's own. i guess people were concerned at early times, but nowadays it's just _another bug_ in the software.

I do not see passphrase (i think the passphrase is a better word for this feature) as a big issue at the moment.

Retr0id · 11 days ago
I wonder what happens if you tell the user not to think of their password.
petethomas · 11 days ago
I think that is kinda what Tim Robbins does in the opening scenes of Code46 i.e. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaVXASxNrq4#t=7m35s
throwaway8654bb · 11 days ago
That is like playing The Game

(if you know what that is, you just lost)

Wowfunhappy · 9 days ago
I know what The Game is, but I didn't loose, because I'm not playing.

And before you say "one of the rules of The Game is that you're always playing The Game," I don't have to follow the rules of a game I am not playing.

IFC_LLC · 11 days ago
Okay, I'll be honest, this looks very finicky. I've tried to understand the premise of this article, but it all look like just a bunch of random facts and promises, none of which could be traced or confirmed.

I can't tell 100% that the text was machine-generated. I won't be too amazed to find out that it was.

But there is no technology explaining how this thing works.

a2128 · 10 days ago
Did you see the study linked in the references section? https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(25)00681-6
LorenDB · 11 days ago
Is there any way to encrypt your brain's traffic and then handshake a decryption key to the implant to ensure that accidental activations merely result in garbage output?
bitwize · 11 days ago
The drawback to that is, if you lose the key you have to hack your own brain, then loop it through Jones.
worthless-trash · 7 days ago
I get that reference.
Melatonic · 11 days ago
You could invent your own language - then think in that. Go oldschool