The order of importance, I have found community here in:
- Swing dancing, both classes and going to shows with live jazz bands to dance (I was never a dancer before moving here)
- Lifting (there are great locally owned gyms in this neighborhood)
- Getting to know people who own or work at local businesses
- People who have similar tech interests, that I meet from a mixture of the previous 3 places
Finally, and I think this is a really important thing to do, I try to organize events, either in my home or in any one of the local parks in the summer, where friends I've made in different parts of my life all get together and also get to know each other
And I completely agree about event organization! It really introduces you to a wider swath of people than your initial search may have turned up.
Way to go!
It is scary once you see what the actual VR research landscape looks like.....
There is a clear disconnect between users of vr and vr researchers.
I don't know even where to begin. Too much incompetence. Too much disinterest. Too much bullshit just to get grant money. And nobody has any clear idea of what VRs application should be.
So far even for me there are very few applications where vr gives an actual advantage for anything.
Take it situational awareness, overview, ux, visual quality etc. Most of the vr apps I have seen have no reason to be in vr.
Actually had a chance to provide my perspective to a FAANG Research Group, but I was laid off (and they were disbanded).
Even something just as the scale like the Transformers being about a block away from you brawling with each other should all be on the plane-at-infinity to you.
It kinda takes the drama out of 3D action. Technically, the 2D version of the movie is probably more actually accurate at the important times in a lot of genres.
1) The only way to be safe is to cede control to the most powerful models to a small group (highly regulated corporations or governments) that can be careful.
2) There is a way to make AI safe without doing this.
If 1 is true, then... sorry, I know it's not a very palatable solution, and may suck, but if that's all we've got I'll take it.
If 2 is true, great. But it seems less likely than 1, to me.
The important thing is not to unconsciously do some motivated reasoning, and think that AGI existential risk can't be a big deal, because if it is, that would mean that we have to cede control over to a small group of people to prevent disaster, which would suck, so there must be something else going on, like these people just want power.
Rather than attaching to seaweed, it can also stick to microplastics and (hopefully) be ingested by marine wildlife. At least as I read the articles.
Alternatively, I'd be curious how many tesla batteries in raw materials that equated to per hour.
And then I was driving through Phoenix Arizona, looking out at the concrete landscape and concrete riverways, and realized just how right he was.