Readit News logoReadit News
ChrisKnott commented on Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)   thewave.engineer/articles... · Posted by u/scrlk
Freak_NL · 4 days ago
The 3-in-1 sets (where the set numbers actually begin with 31) should really be the first thing you look at when choosing a set for a child, and they deserve more praise. There are a lot of cool 3-in-1 sets out there. That castle (31168) is really good (and those horses are too!), and the haunted mansion (31167) is just cool with minifigs which are a hit with any kid.

For a small and cheap present that hamster (31376) is just too cute to pass up too.

It feels like those sets are where the Lego designers get to do their thing and do it right, without the weight of licenced IP (of which there is so much) and the trite offerings of the City range.

ChrisKnott · 3 days ago
Other ones that to me felt like completely fair value and better than anything I had as a child were the Creator Bunny, Space Telescope, and Space Robot. Something like £18/£25/£25 the second two having light bricks included.

JK Brickworks has an alt build for the bunny that doesn’t require a massive amount of different pieces and makes it lay mini eggs.

ChrisKnott commented on Lego's 0.002mm specification and its implications for manufacturing (2025)   thewave.engineer/articles... · Posted by u/scrlk
roelschroeven · 4 days ago
The point is: when I was a kid, all Lego sets consisted almost completely of general bricks. You could, and would, start building different things from the moment you got your first set, and the possibilities would increase exponentially once you got a few more sets. Any set contributed to your collection of building blocks to create new things.
ChrisKnott · 4 days ago
I don’t think this is true at all. What do you mean by “general bricks”? If anything there is more brick-built stuff nowadays.

For example the Creator 3-in-1 Castle (which I got for my son for Christmas) is pretty similar to castle sets I had as a child but basically way better and with brick built horses rather than large mould ones

ChrisKnott commented on We Will Not Be Divided   notdivided.org... · Posted by u/BloondAndDoom
ChrisKnott · 16 days ago
The citation for your quote appears to be an unsourced Reddit post.

The agreement at the heart of 5 Eyes is to not surveil the other nations - this must be up there for most persistently misunderstood fact among techies (probably why AI spits it out)

ChrisKnott commented on Frinkiac – 3M "The Simpsons" Screencaps   frinkiac.com/... · Posted by u/GlumWoodpecker
ChrisKnott · 3 months ago
This is literally my favourite website, I use it several times a week.

I do wish the search was a bit better; it could show the matching quote below the matching frame, and it doesn’t seem to support phrase queries.

A more advanced feature would be searching by speaking character too.

ChrisKnott commented on Frinkiac – 3M "The Simpsons" Screencaps   frinkiac.com/... · Posted by u/GlumWoodpecker
jasongill · 3 months ago
I've always wished the GIF generator could embed the subtitle like the single frame "make a meme" feature can, but it does work surprisingly well
ChrisKnott · 3 months ago
You can do this [0] just press Add Meme after Make GIF.

[0] https://frinkiac.com/video/S06E08/ZzAEDYhlQxZ5l2A8E5aowS1M82...

ChrisKnott commented on How to Draw a Space Invader   muffinman.io/blog/invader... · Posted by u/abdusco
pachevjoseph · 7 months ago
This is one of the best mobile experiences I’ve had reading an article.
ChrisKnott · 7 months ago
Yeah, what a tiny joy when it "picked up" the canvas as it went
ChrisKnott commented on Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act   bbc.com/news/articles/cjr... · Posted by u/phlummox
Lio · 7 months ago
> Ludicrous to call William Perrin “the founder” of Ofcom or refer to it as “his” quango

From his own Carnegie UK webpage linked above:

> William was instrumental in creating Ofcom, reforming the regulatory regimes of several sectors and kicking off the UK government’s interest in open data.

William was awarded an OBE for his highly influential work at Carnegie UK with Prof Lorna Woods that underpinned the UK government’s approach to regulating online services.

How is he not a founder of Ofcom?

That’s not a conspiracy theory, that’s just a verifiable statement of fact.

Or is it the use of the word founder you object to? If you prefer, “was instrumental in setting up and is closely related to the running of Ofcom”.

ChrisKnott · 7 months ago
Both the use of “founder” and “the” are inaccurate and misleading (I notice you’ve switched to “a” without comment). He was a government adviser 20 years ago that was central to the work of creating Ofcom. How is he closely related to the running of Ofcom, today?

The conspiracy theory is your suggestion he is deriving some kind of financial benefit to Carnegie via Yoti - what is the basis for this? (I agree it would be a conflict of interest, though not hypocritical).

ChrisKnott commented on Wikipedia loses challenge against Online Safety Act   bbc.com/news/articles/cjr... · Posted by u/phlummox
Lio · 7 months ago
One of the most interesting things about this legislation is where it comes from.

Primarily it was drafted and lobbied for by William Perrin OBE and Prof Lorna Woods at Carnegie UK[1], billed as an “independent foundation”.

William Perrin is also the founder of Ofcom. So he’s been using the foundation’s money to lobby for the expansion of his unelected quango.

It has also been suggested that one of the largest beneficiaries of this law, an age verification company called Yoti, also has financial ties to Carnegie UK.

It’s difficult to verify that because Yoti is privately held and its backers are secret.

It’s not as if anyone was surprised that teenagers can get round age blocks in seconds so there’s something going on and it stinks.

1. https://carnegieuk.org/team/william-perrin-obe/

ChrisKnott · 7 months ago
Ludicrous to call William Perrin “the founder” of Ofcom or refer to it as “his” quango.

Passive voice, evidence free conspiracy nonsense that flatters HN biases? Updoots to the left!

ChrisKnott commented on Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations   wikimediafoundation.org/n... · Posted by u/Nurw
aaronmdjones · 8 months ago
Their homepage certainly is.
ChrisKnott · 8 months ago
The homepage is manually edited isn't it?
ChrisKnott commented on Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations   wikimediafoundation.org/n... · Posted by u/Nurw
philipwhiuk · 8 months ago
Is search results 'an algorithmic feed'.
ChrisKnott · 8 months ago
The phrase they actually use is "content recommender system". The definition is in the link; you could maybe see some search features falling into it but I don't see how Wikipedia as it exists now is Category 1.

u/ChrisKnott

KarmaCake day2115January 6, 2018
About
Former programmer based in London
View Original