Readit News logoReadit News
Borborygymus commented on CEOs to Keep Spending on AI, Despite Spotty Returns   wsj.com/tech/ai/ceos-to-k... · Posted by u/1vuio0pswjnm7
ryandrake · 4 days ago
The promise of being able to run a business without having to employ people is just too alluring to these guys. They feel like they're nearly on the cusp of it: Like any day now, the technology will be there, and it can just be AI + robots, and the C-suite and shareholders can just pocket all the returns. No more pesky bags of meat to feed and clothe. You can feel it--they are absolutely salivating over the idea. "If we can just get rid of the need for human labor, Line Will Go Up forever!"
Borborygymus · 4 days ago
I concur.
Borborygymus commented on Nearly all UK drivers say headlights are too bright   bbc.com/news/articles/c1j... · Posted by u/YeGoblynQueenne
Borborygymus · a month ago
I always wondered if it would be feasible to make the headlights produce polarized light (e.g. vertical), and have windscreens filter out that polarization... I guess it would only work if the scattering of light off of whatever is being illuminated sufficiently depolarizes the light. Anyhow, I thought it was a neat idea when I was a teenager.

There might be some issues with retro fitting the world's existing road vehicle fleet, but that's a deployment detail. :p

Borborygymus commented on Oxford loses top 3 university ranking in the UK   hotminute.co.uk/2025/09/1... · Posted by u/ilamont
Borborygymus · 3 months ago
I guess Scumbag College's University Challenge performance must have edged them out.
Borborygymus commented on Old and Small Technology   complete.org/old-and-smal... · Posted by u/smartmic
Borborygymus · 7 months ago
Funny to see Emacs with a Y for small... one of the humorous expansions of "Emacs" I once read was, "Eight Megs And Constantly Swapping", alluding to how bloated it was perceived to be.
Borborygymus commented on AI PCs make users less productive   theregister.com/2024/11/2... · Posted by u/rntn
kardos · a year ago
Do the AI PCs do the work locally or transmit everything remotely for processing like chatgpt?
Borborygymus · a year ago
There's not really a standard definition of an AI PC, but if there's anything beyond marketing, it would take the form of a neural processing unit, which supposedly makes some AI-related task fast by providing hardware acceleration. Cited examples include voice recognition and "training models", although I'm pretty sceptical about the later being at any significant scale.

I suspect what it will actually boil down to in many cases is having recall enabled by default and an always-listening voice assistant.

Borborygymus commented on Oracle, it's time to free JavaScript   javascript.tm/... · Posted by u/jeremiahlee
Borborygymus · a year ago
It's long gone the time people should stop doing business with Oracle.
Borborygymus commented on CrowdStrike ex-employees: 'Quality control was not part of our process'   semafor.com/article/09/12... · Posted by u/everybodyknows
Cyclone_ · a year ago
Not justifying what they did with qc, but qc is missing from quite a few places in software development that I've been apart of. People might get the impression from the article that every software project is well tested, whereas in my experience most are rushed out.
Borborygymus · a year ago
Exactly.

Much of the discourse around this topic has described ideal testing and deployment practise. Maybe it's different in Silicon Valley or investment banks, but for the sorts of companies I work for (telco mostly) things are very far from that ideal.

My view of he industry is one of shocking technical ineptitude from all but a minority of very competent people who actually keep things running... Of management who prioritize short term cost reduction over quality at every opportunity, leading to appalling technical debt and demoralized, over-worked staff who rapidly stop giving a damn about quality, because speaking out about quality problems is penalized.

Deleted Comment

Borborygymus commented on Expect – Linux tool for automating interactive programs   linux.die.net/man/1/expec... · Posted by u/actinium226
broodbucket · a year ago
expect is one of those true love/hate things. Probably because the situations in which you need to use it are likely cursed. My time spent dealing with expect scripts is always miserable, and yet I don't know what I'd do without it
Borborygymus · a year ago
> the situations in which you need to use it are likely cursed.

So true, and yet so common.

Borborygymus commented on Expect – Linux tool for automating interactive programs   linux.die.net/man/1/expec... · Posted by u/actinium226
philxor · a year ago
Linux tool? Hate when everything Unix automatically gets categorized as Linux. Have used Expect for many years for many use cases from automating servers to networking use cases as well.
Borborygymus · a year ago
I used to use it on HP-UX in the 90s.

u/Borborygymus

KarmaCake day46August 15, 2015View Original