Readit News logoReadit News
fabian2k · 2 months ago
The absolutely outrageous thing is that apparently they are instructed to ignore all other evidence of citizenship if that app says someone is not a citizen. So even if you have your birth certificate ready, doesn't matter.

This is completely lawless.

From the article:

> He also said “ICE officials have told us that an apparent biometric match by Mobile Fortify is a ‘definitive’ determination of a person’s status and that an ICE officer may ignore evidence of American citizenship—including a birth certificate—if the app says the person is an alien.

willis936 · 2 months ago
I don't think it's a coincidence that identity masking of deputies starts happening the moment that deputies start doing illegal things. They are jumping to the very end of "what can we do if we remove every means of accountability, present or future?"
duxup · 2 months ago
I think ICE is in fact setup / groomed to be ... lawless. Just thugs for the federal government.
dragonwriter · 2 months ago
Its not just ICE, its clear Trump intent for law enforcement (and not just federal) from even very early on in his first term, where a highlighted priority was terminating then-active federal enforcement actions against state law enforcement agencies for violations of civil rights. Lawless “law enforcement” has been one of the most consistent overt priorities Trump has had.
jazzyjackson · 2 months ago
Biometrics are more protected in IL than an other states as well. Facebook settled a big lawsuit just for automatically tagging people (actually the suit was about storing the biometric face data at all without consent)
qingcharles · 2 months ago
They are. BIPA is top rate. I looked at the statute, which excludes Illinois state and local government entities, but does not talk of federal bodies. I don't know enough about the supremacy of federal statutes to know how that works, and most discussions note that the statute excludes "the government" which is not totally accurate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biometric_Information_Privacy_...

evanjrowley · 2 months ago
Legal action against this is going to be a tough, possibly unfeasable battle.

Whatever the laws are, they probably contain exceptions for the use of biometrics for law enforcement purposes.

In terms of court precedent, biometrics are not protected by the 4th amendment, because your face is not considered a secret that the government could compel you to reveal.

nitwit005 · 2 months ago
I'm somewhat morbidly curious how many citizens we're going to deport to random countries. It happened fairly often before this administration.
IAmGraydon · 2 months ago
Can you give me some specific examples of deported citizens?
downrightmike · 2 months ago
People can look identical, that's the reason we started using finger prints. Faces are not unique.
burkaman · 2 months ago
Also, this app uses photos from a combination of government databases, but there are millions of citizens without photo ID who won't show up in any of them.
krapp · 2 months ago
There is no scientific proof that fingerprints are unique, either. Like a lot of forensic science, it's just accepted wisdom.
qingcharles · 2 months ago
My friend (who has an identical twin) was joking about scanning himself into Cameo mode on Sora and making some goofy videos and saying they were his brother.
yubblegum · 2 months ago
A book to read on the history of surveillance technology, starting with "pass papers" for slaves to finger prints:

The Soft Cage - Surveillance in America: From Slavery to the War on Terror, Christian Parenti, 2003

https://archive.org/details/softcagesurveill0000pare

deepfriedchokes · 2 months ago
Lots of lawsuits forthcoming. Who’s going to pay for them? We are.
troyvit · 2 months ago
Cops be cops: https://denverite.com/2025/10/27/bow-mar-flock-cameras-accus...

In that case it's Bow Mar, a small town in Colorado, relying on flock cameras to issue tickets for petty theft.

We as a society just aren't capable of using these toys right.

potato3732842 · 2 months ago
I'd say it's nice to see that particular demographic at the business end of this 1984 crap since they're usually the ones pushing it but I don't think the rest of them are smart enough to have the "that could be me" reaction.
xtracto · 2 months ago
At this point, the US is a failed democracy and a facist state. I would definitely advice people from other countries to leave ASAP.

The facist American government is even sending their dissident citizens to detention camps in Africa .

Good luck to Americans that cannot go somewhere else.

lawn · 2 months ago
> the person is an alien

The dehumanizing language is absolutely disgusting and it's use is an important milestone towards genocide.

robocat · 2 months ago
It is often the case that a "good" word is used, and then the derogatory secondary meanings grow.

Years ago special needs was a fairly safe term, yet now "speshul" definitely has different tone. I'm sure you know if many other examples (I can think of heaps). I predict that "delayed" will become derogatory.

I think that banning words is literally dumb. I am bit older and went through the Politically Correct putsh. Disclaimer: I'm a lefty.

clawr · 2 months ago
Alien has been the legal term since the beginning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_and_Sedition_Acts
throw-the-towel · 2 months ago
This particular word has been in official use for ages. I agree that it's disgusting.
gorbachev · 2 months ago
> This is completely lawless.

They don't give a **.

https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/the-rule-of-law-i...

jaco6 · 2 months ago
Birth certificates and driver's licenses can be and are routinely faked by everyone from high school students to foreign agents. Faces cannot be faked.
hamdingers · 2 months ago
You're making the unreasonable assumption of good faith on the part of the app developers.

It could be designed to accurately distinguish citizens from noncitizens, or it could be connected to a database of online agitators, or picking out facial features of targeted minorities without regard to their personal identity, or some combination of all of these and worse. You don't know.

acdha · 2 months ago
Faces can’t be easily be “faked” in person but they can definitely be misrecognized or recognized correctly against mistagged data. Anything like this needs to be designed with the assumption that errors will be frequent enough that the finding has to be validated before doing something serious.
puppycodes · 2 months ago
Seems like this would be to collect faces of what they consider "dissedents" rather than verify citizenship which can be done much more accurately through a mobile fingerprint reader.

Then again, who needs accuracy when you dissapear people without a warrant.

ASalazarMX · 2 months ago
Fingerprint is individual surveillance, face scanning is mass surveillance. I'd expect governments to always favour the latter if given the choice.
alwa · 2 months ago
When are citizens’ fingerprints normally put on file, in the US? Or, for that matter, noncitizens who entered irregularly?
trillic · 2 months ago
Joining a program like NEXUS or Global Entry is the only time I’ve had my fingerprints taken by the govt. When I worked for a couple highly-regulated financial institutions I was fingerprinted as part of a background check but that was done by a private party who (allegedly) was just checking for matches with known criminals.
buttercraft · 2 months ago
AFAIK only if you are booked into jail, and also for some licenses. For example, a beer and wine license for a restaurant requires fingerprints, at least in my state, not sure how it varies. Probably some types of firearm licenses as well. Not typical driver's licenses though.
IG_Semmelweiss · 2 months ago
Anyone going thru the process of getting licensed as a stockbroker is fingerprinted (Series 63, 7 test)

Its possible that insurance broker license is the same. Same for pharmacist.

I think a lot of US trades have fingerprinting as requisite, particularly if they require a background check.

red-iron-pine · 2 months ago
joined the military. they did fingerprints and IIRC they were starting to log DNA.

if you have access to profoundly expensive weaponry and training to use it, it makes sense. also if you're shipping bodies back in pieces -- fingerprints, dental records, and DNA may be the only way to figure out what happened to you.

JohnMakin · 2 months ago
When you get a driver's license, for one.
Animats · 2 months ago
In half an hour, Gregory Bovino, who heads some ICE operation in Chicago, is supposed to appear before a Federal judge to be questioned on what ICE did to whom today. Let's see if he shows up.
Animats · 2 months ago
Didn't happen. A frantic appeal by the Administration to the 7th circuit court of appeals postponed it.
cozzyd · 2 months ago
The frustrating thing is the judge originally requested 1630 but then acquiesced to 1800.

Deleted Comment

barbazoo · 2 months ago
Wow this is going downhill fast. I don't have access to the article but I'm assuming this is what Palantir is all about right? Or are we not quite there yet, is this the CBP face scanning they have at border crossings too?
burkaman · 2 months ago
It's about this app, they won't tell anyone who developed it: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_Fortify.
oceansky · 2 months ago
I wonder who is storing this data, I would bet Palantir. Possibly Oracle too.
neom · 2 months ago
Did some research, biometrics specifically for facial ID for DHS/CBP seems to be awarded to NEC and Thales.

https://www.nec.com/en/global/solutions/biometrics/face/neof...

pavel_lishin · 2 months ago
Very likely an array of hackers, soon.
qingcharles · 2 months ago
I assume the agents are using their own phones. One of their phones is going to be left in a bar and end up on eBay at some point and then the APK can be extracted at least.
crypto420 · 2 months ago
Not Palantir. Their CEO has explicitly said that they don't collect data on US citizens.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-IH7EVrBbQ

shostack · 2 months ago
Do they partner with Clearview or Flock or anyone else? "Collect" seems like a weasel word that still leaves lots of options on the table.
quantumcotton · 2 months ago
Dumb question, but can't they get around that considering they are looking for people whom are not US citizens?
red-iron-pine · 2 months ago
that's a boldface fuckin lie
dv_dt · 2 months ago
what is the database being compared against?
an0malous · 2 months ago
a skin tone chart

Dead Comment

EasyMark · 2 months ago
Anyone who doesn't think this won't be used against regular citizens is living a very sheltered life. Vote out the clowns every time you get a chance.

Dead Comment

ck2 · 2 months ago
When I saw them do iris scanning during Iraq War I instantly knew that was coming to US police sooner or later, I guess this is the new easier method

The crazy thing is though these people don't even have an identifying badge number and their license plates are often fake, zero repercussions for anything and they know it

Imagine by 2028 what's going down if this is still the first year