Readit News logoReadit News
dlivingston · 16 days ago
I'm surprised it's still being offered period! My parents live in a remote area outside of a rural town in one of the USA's smaller states, and even they haven't had dial-up in ~15 years. We grew up with dial-up until about 2010, when they switched over to (absolutely terrible) satellite internet. HughsNet, I think it was called. Two-ish years ago they switched over to Starlink and it's been working well (when it does work, anyway).
ack_complete · 16 days ago
Apparently they just shut it down in 2024, but a couple of years ago I tested an Atari 1030 modem by dialing out to Earthlink, and it still worked -- successfully connected at 300 baud.
bobmcnamara · 16 days ago
I worked somewhere with a small office run over Hughesnet. Some sort of upload-over-dial-up, broadband-download-over-satellite, with 1500ms latency for everything.
nosioptar · 16 days ago
I know people just a couple hours from Seattle that still use dial up.

Most are older and don't want to spend the obscene prices for satellite, cellular signal isn't good enough out there.

nemomarx · 16 days ago
The telecom hasn't tried to get them on DSL? There's subsidized low income programs for it (or where, idk what the status is now) so I can't imagine the cost was much higher. And if I were an ISP I might eat the cost of the upgrade just to avoid support complications for a small set of customers.
Espressosaurus · 15 days ago
Web pages and emails have gotten so bloated, how do you even use the internet over dialup as a consumer?
chrisco255 · 16 days ago
I don't know how anyone can use the modern internet with dial up. It's got to be useless for all but email.
dzhiurgis · 16 days ago
Is dial up still at 56kbps?
rerdavies · 16 days ago
Intense nostalgia. It brings me back to a point in time where the world suddenly turned and the possibilities seemed limitless. And all of those possibilities looked a little more idealistic, and a little less mercenary than what we actually got.

Not that I'm really complaining. I do like what we got.

And curiously different from the AI revolution, where there are no pretensions of idealism at at all, and everyone clearly understands that whoever wins this time will quite literally own the entire world, if the plan succeeds. And that it won't be a pleasant or pretty world for the rest of us, and that all of the leading candidates for King of the Universe don't care at all that the rest of us will be discarded. The complete opposite, in that regard.

I shall have to break out my set of AOL CD drink coasters, and put songs from Camelot on permanent repeat in order to mark the passing of an age with the solemnity it deserves.

paulryanrogers · 16 days ago
I wish we had gotten municipal fiber. Back when telecoms had to lease their lines the competition was great. Cable companies growing fat on outdated cable lines has held many of us back for too long.
tombert · 16 days ago
My parents didn't have AOL when I was a kid; we had Prodigy, I think because they had promotions to get a cheap or free computer if you signed up for N years of Prodigy internet.

I was always kind of jealous of my friends who had AOL because I wanted the "You've Got Mail!" greeting, and I would see promotions that talk about "AOL Keywords" and I couldn't use those with Prodigy.

Amazing to think that AOL still offered dial-up service.

neilpomerleau · 16 days ago
gregsadetsky · 16 days ago
I like this explanatory graphic (after many many years of listening to the dialup sounds) - https://oona.windytan.com/posters/dialup-final.png

And this version combining the graphic and the sound used to make the graphic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abapFJN6glo

And this alternative version (h/t @Kye): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpMrTxMV6E4

dylan604 · 16 days ago
Your link had a "slower" version, but I always like the really slow version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IF2v32xCD0Y

pogue · 16 days ago
kbr2000 · 16 days ago
lol, reminds me of this Monkey Dust one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2j_hXHEjX4
maxbond · 16 days ago
Thanks for making that! Boy is that more annoying than I remembered.
twilightzone · 16 days ago
That's subjective! I made a song with that sound in 1998. It was called "Net Pet" and it did pretty well on mp3.com.
altairprime · 16 days ago
It sounded a lot less enthusiastically piercing through a speaker embedded inside a steel computer :)
firesteelrain · 16 days ago
I’d just nod my head to the sound
apetresc · 16 days ago
I didn't even know AOL was still around, let alone AOL dial-up.
LeoPanthera · 16 days ago
They offer a “tech support for old people” service which is actually really good.
800xl · 16 days ago
I thought they were just a web portal and email service. It is amazing they still offered ISP services this long.

They had some pretty unscrupulous business practices back in the day with their free trial CD mailers. My cousin worked in their call center ages ago and would sometimes convince even people who didn't have a computer to pay for the service.

benchly · 16 days ago
Do they still offer the floppies with the free hours? I need a new set of drink coasters.
derwiki · 16 days ago
No no—the CDs were coasters, the floppies you could put a piece of tape over the protection window and reuse
danans · 16 days ago
One wonders what the dial up ops department/team at AOL even looks like now. I wonder if it's anyone's full time job, or just something that occupies a fraction of their time.
loose-cannon · 16 days ago
I wonder how quickly you can load some of the modern, popular, websites on a dial up connection.
sugarpimpdorsey · 16 days ago
We have a whole generation of programmers that will justify 12MB of JavaScript bundles to output "Hello world".

Deleted Comment

donio · 16 days ago
Easy to see for yourself using the throttling option in the developer tools of popular browsers.
derwiki · 16 days ago
This orange site is fine but I wouldn’t hold my breath on any others
benchly · 16 days ago
Something low-resource demand (like my blog) would probably be okay, save for a few large pics on some pages. Most people who run in the smolweb circles also like vintage computing, so creating webspaces using only HTML & CSS is common practice, which should do fine over a 56k connection.
duskwuff · 16 days ago
Google homepage: two or three minutes

A Google SERP with rich content: about 20 minutes

A typical Facebook post: ten minutes

CNN home page: half an hour

YouTube: forget it

jmclnx · 16 days ago
>CNN home page: half an hour

This should be much faster, it was created for people with limited network access.

https://lite.cnn.com/

dylan604 · 16 days ago
RealMedia: buffering
smelendez · 16 days ago
I’d bet a lot of them are using old computers too, with who knows what browser and OS. It’s probably hard to tell loading issues from rendering issues
timbit42 · 16 days ago
You can save many hours by installing uBlock Origin.
BobbyTables2 · 16 days ago
Page loading times would probably be measurable with a sundial or calendar.
grishka · 16 days ago
No need to wonder, just end up in an old building with thick brick walls that are only penetrated by a weak 2G signal and try to load something on your phone.
wtallis · 16 days ago
Not possible anymore is many areas, where 2G and 3G networks have been shutdown to re-use spectrum for newer standards. The last time I was in a rural area with minimal signal strength, my phone was alternating between satellite-only messaging or 5G with 5-10 MB/s. I was actually able to download a movie in a quite reasonable amount of time, presumably because there wasn't anyone else doing much with the cell tower I was barely in range of.
philistine · 16 days ago
You can test it yourself in the comfort of your gigabit connection. I wanted to test my barrage of very small images using lazy loading on a crappy connection. I learned that Chrome can easily pretend to suck. On Safari you somehow need to download a special tool but it works just as well.

Or as worse I guess.

tonetegeatinst · 16 days ago
Do you know if Firefox or edge has a similar feature and if so what its called?
bawolff · 16 days ago
I think chrome dev tools has a button to simulate different internet speeds.

But im pretty sure the answer is really damn slow.

Telaneo · 16 days ago
I know Firefox has it, since I used it to test my own website. Once you go past text and really small images, it starts taking minutes to load.
reify · 16 days ago
I love that sound

I always create an alias to make that sound and another for the matrix phone sound when I connect to the internet.

the sound files are available here: https://www.soundjay.com/dial-up-modem-sound-effect.html

for the matrix:

alias wifion="nmcli dev wifi connect 'wifi-name'" && paplay /path/to/soundfile/matrix-phone.wav

for the old dial up tones:

alias wifioff="nmcli d disconnect wlp3s0" && /path/to/soundfile/dial-up-modem-02.wav

linux has loads of these sounds in /usr/share/sounds/freedesktop/stereo