Readit News logoReadit News
pronik · 6 months ago
Gina Trapani! That's a name I haven't heard in a long time and at first couldn't place correctly -- for some reason, my mind went to Groklaw, but Lifehacker was the correct answer. Maybe I'm idolizing my own youth and its associated available free time just a tiny bit and I can't actually believe it's been 20 years, but those felt like good times, Web 2.0 with its focus on communication instead of publishing, with Slashdot up top for tech news, Lifehacker, Engadget and many other sites not yet owned by big corporations feeling fresh and bearing individual flair, making you feel being a part of something. A rare feeling in modern times.
sneak · 6 months ago
There are still tons of websites (more now than ever) not owned by gigantic corporations. It's not their fault that you and the masses mostly stopped going to them in favor of facebook and twitter and instagram and, of course, apps.

(You're on one right now, naturally.)

I get the same feeling when people say "RSS is dead". I read dozens of websites via RSS and my RSS reader still works fine. Very few blogs I want to read don't support RSS.

kqr · 6 months ago
This happens with programming languages also. Lots of people cry "Perl is dead" because its market share is decreasing. But its absolute user count is increasing!

It's not a competition for a limited size of pie; the pie is still growing at a frightening pace, along with all its pieces.

unmotivated-hmn · 6 months ago
Could you share a few that you frequent? I'd love to read!
linhns · 6 months ago
Actually, it’s making a comeback now somewhat, thanks to the inherent capability to filter and select only wanted content and weed out the noise in this world.

Deleted Comment

pronik · 6 months ago
I'm firmly on the RSS bandwagon though. The shift comes from much more limited time and I need to filter what I can use it for.
tuananh · 6 months ago
ah that's it. i remember the name from when lifehacker was still popular.
tushar-r · 6 months ago
Haha, I was thinking about her and the old Lifehacker just this last week! :-)
sircastor · 6 months ago
I did the same thing! For me though it was a bunch podcasts she was on.
jedsundwall · 6 months ago
She was just on my podcast! https://techsontexts.net/episodes/2025/01/zevin-gina-trapani...

She's the best. :)

Semaphor · 6 months ago
I loved the old LH when she ran it (and a short time after, before it became fully enshittified). Still have a Steelcase Leap chair, which was the usual runner-up to the Herman Miller Aeron in their office chair votes.
morsecodist · 6 months ago
Weeks is the most terrifying unit of time to think in. Short enough so you have a good sense of how long it feels but long enough to add up quickly.
silvestrov · 6 months ago
Fun fact: Nordic countries use week numbers for all sorts of planning, e.g. vacation period, school events, company planning, statistics reporting, ...

All calendars show week numbers.

krykp · 6 months ago
I use GNOME with week numbers shown in[0]! Find it super useful.

I am also a big fan of setting yearly goals. Been doing this for a couple of years now. This has sort of converged into a tradition of having ~12 goals per year.

Each item is something quantifiable and achievable. For example, a goal of mine is 'losing x amount of weight', as opposed to 'becoming fit' - this I won't expand into other domains however, if the context is making a game, it would be 'publishing a game', and not 'publishing a game that sells a million copies', as the latter depends on factors outside of your control, luck, etc.

The way I set up my own goals, they are achievable if I were to focus on these for a quarter alone. They are not big, huge deals. But I don't focus on these for a quarter of course, I have to go to work, and I have a family and loved ones that I enjoy spending time with. Yet it is also an anchor I look at occasionally, and if the list is having too little progress, I get the message that I should work on these for a while. I find it to be a nice balance.

0: gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.calendar show-weekdate true

vidarh · 6 months ago
I'm Norwegian, but never got used to this, and to this day (I turn 50 this year) my mum will try to communicate time with me using week numbers, and I have to tell her to use dates.
jks · 6 months ago
Another fun fact: there are three commonly used ways to define week numbers (see `man strftime`, %U, %V, %W; %V is the one used in at least the Nordics). In some years they coincide so you might not notice that you picked the wrong one until next January.

Yet another fun fact: with %V week numbers, the date 2024-12-30 (December 30, 2024) was 2025-W01-1 (the Monday of week 1, 2025). Thus strftime needs two different ways to specify the year: %G denotes the year that goes with %V week numbers, %Y denotes the year that people usually think of when they ask "what year is it". Unfortunately %G comes before %Y on the strftime man page, so people who scan the page quickly can easily pick %G when they really want %Y. I've seen a few bugs caused by this.

I have also seen the corresponding bug in SQL, using IYYY instead of YYYY. This boggles the mind, but apparently when some people read "ISO 8601 week-numbering year", they only see "ISO 8601 ... year", think "yes, that's the date standard we use" and don't care about the "week-numbering" word in the middle.

edanm · 6 months ago
Fascinating! Thanks for sharing.

I've done a bunch of thinking around how to organize things in dates, etc, and often wondered if I should be using week numbers. Never thought to look up if it's a common practice in any countries.

wink · 6 months ago
Not so fun fact: Corporate Germany also uses week numbers and some paper pushers and some project managers have adapted, most nerds (incl. me) will never come to terms with it and have to look it up once a month. Also what do you mean by "all calendars" - the last paper one I owned I bought at an art fair in 2018ish ;)
elcapitan · 6 months ago
Quite common in German companies too, it's usually refered to as KW, tomorrow (2025/02/17) KW 8 starts.
teaearlgraycold · 6 months ago
So that’s why Minecraft uses weeks for prerelease versioning.
Daunk · 6 months ago
WHAT?! I thought everyone did this!
Apofis · 6 months ago
And the best part of it is that there's really only about 4000 weeks for any one of us! It's an interesting metric.
sigmoid10 · 6 months ago
4000 in total. The first ~1000 are spent in the the very limited tutorial area.
ozim · 6 months ago
I am closing on to 40yo - having left most likely less than half of that is not what I would describe „best part” :)
jks · 6 months ago
Oliver Burkeman wrote a book about this, named "Four Thousand Weeks: Time Management for Mortals". The main point (at least as I remember it) is that there are way more books to read, links to click, and things to do than you can fit in your lifetime, so it's a delusion that you could ever get to the end of your to-do list.
tintumon · 6 months ago
It's so common but at the same so confusing that we have a dedicated website in Sweden to keep track https://vecka.nu/
jks · 6 months ago
We have that in Finland too: https://viikkonumero.fi/

That one also lets you look up other weeks by number, which is occasionally useful. But the calmer design of https://vecka.nu is very pleasant!

kamaal · 6 months ago
>>Weeks is the most terrifying unit of time to think in.

Indeed. A week is basically 2% of a year, which is quite a chunk. You basically get 50 ticks a year, and that ticks quite fast.

In case you are wondering how an year goes by that fast, this is how.

interludead · 6 months ago
But on the flip side, having a weekly focus can make things more manageable, like breaking down a big goal into smaller chunks
picafrost · 6 months ago
So much of our life is consumed by work. Seeing your lifespan laid bare like this, there's a perverse instinct to optimize what remains. Have to be more productive, more efficient. But it's a bit like seeing you're bleeding out and deciding to optimize your blood donation schedule, isn't it?
steve_adams_86 · 6 months ago
The older I get the more I realize that the most effective and productive things I can do are not at all what seem to be productive or effective on the surface.

One of the most mentally and physically crippling things I’ve ever done was work too hard, for too long. I worked and earned more money than I thought I ever could but… All I truly got out of it was a lesson. To never do it again. I would have earned enough but also enjoyed my life had I just calmed down a bit.

I’m sure you know as well as I do, if not better. It seemed worth noting though.

codazoda · 6 months ago
Did you ever start that non-tech business?
jll29 · 6 months ago
In this Lex Fiedman video, they talk about how life is short, and a visualization as a spreadsheet is shown that makes one very concerned:

Pieter Levels: Programming, Viral AI Startups, and Digital Nomad Life | Lex Fridman Podcast #440 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFtjKbXKqbg [ironically, the podcast is very long - over 3 hours - speaking of not wasting time, but after initial annoyance I'm glad I watched it all.]

The positive insight that can come out of that is use every week and don't waste it, and and if you can, move your long-term dreams closer to the here and now.

I made a version of that spreadsheet for "the rest of my life" to hand it into my office as a reminder. (Even if I will live until 90, it fits my laptop screen without scrolling...)

dostick · 6 months ago
Should everyone make it? On one hand it’s awareness, on another- at cause endless anxiety that you now visualised how little it is and still can’t do anything..
dxuh · 6 months ago
Where can I find the visualization? Skipping through I could not find it and I am not sold on it enough to spend almost 4 hours on this.
etoulas · 6 months ago
Do you mind pointing out the Moment when they show this?
nyokodo · 6 months ago
> Have to be more productive, more efficient

Most people on their deathbed would counsel you to focus on relationships rather than productivity.

massysett · 6 months ago
This is something one says on their deathbed when they have had a good life.

Maybe some people who have wasted half their life being completely unproductive say “I wish I focused on relationships more” on their deathbed. But many others might say “I wasted my whole life, I wish I got it together.” The thing is, those people don’t write books or give seminars on how to live a good life. They die alone and are quickly forgotten.

ge96 · 6 months ago
I'd like my KPI metrics etched on my gravestone
adriand · 6 months ago
That’s the conventional wisdom but I think it’s worth challenging it. Or at least, if by “productivity” you mean “work” (I think there’s an important distinction there).

There is nothing wrong with your work being the focus of your life. Many people derive great pleasure and satisfaction from, and make a positive impact on the world with, their work. Life without relationships would be a hell of loneliness, but life without work would be a hell of boredom and meaninglessness. (I’m aware that much work is drudgery, I refer mainly to the kind of work one can derive joy from, which I suspect many of us on HN have in our lives.)

The question “is it okay to work all the time” is explored rather well here:

https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/search-engine/id161425...

card_zero · 6 months ago
Most people on their deathbed who would counsel you would counsel you to focus on relationships. The ones who had the insight "people can fuck right off, that's the key to it all" aren't interested in telling us about it.
guax · 6 months ago
The only life worth living is the one that maximizes shareholder value. /s
layer8 · 6 months ago
Finding work that gives one enjoyment and purpose should be an important priority.
haswell · 6 months ago
As I’ve gotten older, I’ve shifted to: learning how to find enjoyment and purpose from whatever situation you find yourself in should be an important priority.

Finding work that is inherently enjoyable and purposeful to you is still great if you can find it. But that’s not always possible, and I’ve been increasingly interested in the ideas in books like “Flow”, which details the ways people in all manner of circumstances find purpose/enjoyment from the work in front of them.

BizarreByte · 6 months ago
That's completely unrealistic though. If you have a job that allows you to support yourself and doesn't make you want to veer into oncoming traffic daily that's about as good as it gets for the vast majority of people.

There's so many reasons why purpose should be found outside of work.

PaulDavisThe1st · 6 months ago
Like others replying to this comment, I disagree because there is much work that needs to be done which cannot truly provide purpose to most people.

However ... I do believe that any job should provide dignity and "purpose" in the narrower sense of something the person doing it believes needs to be done. Any job done full time (however a culture defines that) should also make a reasonable lower middle class life possible.

markus_zhang · 6 months ago
Only the luckiest guys get both at the same time.
svilen_dobrev · 6 months ago
There's one pie-chart of average person's life.. and only 9 years are left free out of-78 . - how-u-spend-it is up to you..

https://www.visualistan.com/2015/02/what-do-7-billion-people...

ydant · 6 months ago
Interesting perspective.

Though, I'd argue it should be 18 years free by their math. They lump a subset of leisure activities into another category as if those are beyond your easy control.

Commuting, working, grooming, etc - sure, you could optimize those, but it's harder to deviate from the norm. But TV/video games? Doesn't seem like the same discussion.

hnthrowaway0315 · 6 months ago
Exactly. I have thought about it for a while, I think I have to get rid of work or family to be substantially happier. Apparently getting rid of family is morally wrong, so the only option is to get rid of work, somehow, anyhow.

I fully understand why people buy lottery tickets. Hope beats probability on every single instance. I, a Master of Statistics graduates, buy them too.

theoreticalmal · 6 months ago
Is morality really the major thing standing between you and “getting rid of your family”?
kenjackson · 6 months ago
What’s going on with your family? I can’t imagine much joy without mine.
jdthedisciple · 6 months ago
> Apparently getting rid of family is morally wrong

Apparently? That's the only thing stopping you from "getting rid of your family" whatever that would mean in practical terms?

Are you Chris Watts' younger brother?

Jesus, wonder if some people even deserve families...

harryquach · 6 months ago
This is why I have interest in the FIRE movement. Our lives are short and fleeting. If there is even a small chance I can become financially independent before traditional retirement age, I am going to optimize for that.
interludead · 6 months ago
We spend so much time optimizing for productivity that we sometimes miss the bigger picture: the quality of life itself, not just the quantity of tasks we can check off
999900000999 · 6 months ago
My biggest failure has been not getting an extreme income ( 300k TC a year +) before 30.

I had planned to retire by 40 and be done with this work nonsense. Now I'm in my mid 30s and that doesn't seem possible.

However I will say if you have a highly variable income ( one year you make 100$ an hour, the next year you have no work), you should max out your 401k during the good times. Having 30k in retirement funds that you'll get smacked for drawing on is better than nothing.

Too late now. I'm comfortable, but I think the era of 300k TC is done.

hnthrowaway0315 · 6 months ago
Yup. My advice to young people is -- if you can't figure out what to do in life, make more $$. With enough $$ you will have a world of time to ponder what to do.

I also regret that I gave up a FAANG level opportunity because my faily doesn't want me to go to another city. I would hit well over 200K TC by now -- a very comfortable salary in Canada.

ojbyrne · 6 months ago
Look for jobs that have a good match and allow Roth megabackdoor. Because having 70k a year in retirement funds is somewhat life changing.
lionkor · 6 months ago
Very cool, thank you so much for sharing! One thing that hit me as a European is that you consider president inaugurations interesting enough to put in there! I mean, its a great point of reference, but still interesting to me. I couldn't tell you from when to when Merkel was chancellor, and I couldn't care less.
yzydserd · 6 months ago
For me, I employ presidential terms as memorable 4 year labels, much the same as Olympiads (Beijing 2008, Sydney 2000, Barcelona 1992). It’s got zero to do with (geo) political influence. The Olympiads work as point in time “beats”, while presidential terms are “long tones”. Weird memory functions.
karparov · 6 months ago
Fun fact, the "olympiad" is the whole 4 year period. The name of the event that you are referring to is "olympic games".
wink · 6 months ago
The news in the media (and outside) is so full of this that I might even be better at naming US presidents and their terms in reverse than German chancellors. The two term limit helps, to be fair. We're only on the fourth since I was born, vs 8 (counting non-consecutives) in the US. (Like, of course I can name ours, but not the exact years)
jokethrowaway · 6 months ago
Politicians in the states have more influence and can still do something and effect change. In Europe we're way past that, they are just bureaucrats spinning wheels, extracting value and doing minor changes (some good, some bad), gradually boiling us alive until they extracted any value from society and we collapse.
Tarq0n · 6 months ago
In Europe legislative bodies are responsible for moving things along. The executive takes care of filling in the gaps, taking care of current affairs and international diplomacy. This is by design.
lionkor · 6 months ago
I have to vehemently disagree. There is a massive amount of bureaucracy, but good, meaningful changes are implemented.
gniv · 6 months ago
I like gradual change. I see things here in France changing (for the better mostly) here and there but yes no dramatic shifts. The US model seems irresponsible by comparison.
NoLinkToMe · 6 months ago
What are you talking about, what value did Merkel extract for example?

I think Europe has done more good for the world than bad in the last few decades. On the other hand we're still feeling the effects of US involvement in the middle east.

As for politicians in the states having influence... congress is supposed to make the laws that the president executes. The joke is that the US is now operating in complete opposition of that. The president rules by decree, congress members have no real influence and would get decimated in a re-election campaign if they act out of favor of the president. I'd say politicans in the US have less influence do effect change, not more. In fact non-politicians like Musk/Thiel have more influence than politicians, that's more the case than it has been in many decades.

Dead Comment

apwell23 · 6 months ago
OP is a homosexual ( pls suggest the correct word here) so i think its of special importance to her. i would bet most ppl won't put "cheeto inaugurated" on their life in weeks.
ludwik · 6 months ago
> pls suggest the correct word here

Simply dropping the "a", turning the word from a noun into an adjective, would make the phrase sound more friendly.

scarface_74 · 6 months ago
Yes and no. All Presidents have been more or less hostile to gay people at least when they were inaugurated until weirdly enough Biden.

Clinton signed the “Don’t Ask or Don’t Tell” legislation and Obama was originally in favor of the the protection of marriage act. They both have changed as the winds have changed.

Also she called out that prop 8 banning gay marriage was signed in California.

rednafi · 6 months ago
This is a terrifying reminder of the shortness of our lives. I remember reading a blog by Tim Urban, where he showed that you could put all the weeks in your life on a single piece of A4 paper, and it didn’t feel nice.
rcpt · 6 months ago
Rare win for not being able to connect to my home printer.
csdvrx · 6 months ago
Funny fact: clocks used to feature "Una ex his" (for "Una ex his erit tibi ultima") in order to maximize this "terrifying reminder" effect
ajnin · 6 months ago
> Una ex his erit tibi ultima

For those who don't speak fluent Latin, that means "one of those will be your last". Ominous reminder indeed.

maelito · 6 months ago
Well, I saw it in the opposite way. Author has done a lot of things between his age and mine. So many new things for me to discover.
rob74 · 6 months ago
Her
pedalpete · 6 months ago
What strikes me is the empty spaces where we don't recognize what we did, or didn't do anything memorable.

I made an app to try to address this about a decade ago which I called Bucket52, the idea being that every week you put one memorable thing in it. Trying to do this just for a year was surprisingly difficult.

kelnos · 6 months ago
For me I just want to remember what's gone on in my life better, even if it's sometimes mundane. I've tried short-form daily journaling, but I've only made it around 3 months before I start skipping days and stop doing it altogether.

When it comes to doing something new/memorable, I'd be fine with aspiring for just one thing per month (with the assumption that sometimes/often I'd end up with more than that).

I think the way to make things like this work is to start with a low-ambition target, and then scale up until just before the point where it starts to feel difficult to keep it going. I'm not sure I could keep up a cadence of doing one memorable thing per week. Once a month seems doable, though. But if I were really uncertain, maybe I'd first target once per two months, and then see how much more frequently I could do memorable things before it started feeling like a difficult burden.

zestyrx · 6 months ago
I started this in 2015 and I'm still keeping up with it. Maybe it will work for you.

https://medium.com/@markracette/make-every-day-matter-9ac6db...

harryquach · 6 months ago
I have started and stopped journaling times over the years. When I initially got a smart phone, i started taking photos of mundane everyday things. I’ve now been consistently doing this for many years. It just takes a few seconds to take out the phone and snap a few photos. I have many short videos and photos of my kids over the years doing them mundane that I treasure with my life.
DavidPiper · 6 months ago
I've started just keeping a text list of "interesting things that I did / happened to me this year". It's nice to look back on at the end of each year - my primary reaction is "OMG that was this year??"
delichon · 6 months ago
From this view it's clear how wasteful ontogeny is. All of that physical and psychological development takes too much valuable time and investment. And we haven't even gotten to Gina's retirement years yet. Clearly the future is in using 3D bioprinting to build fully formed adults as if sprung from the brow of Zeus. Skill and memory transfer are a technical problem only as long as we cling to our bias against our artificially intelligent upgrades. Aging is defeated by implanting our old model weights into a new print. So much efficiency is waiting if we dare to free ourselves from convention.
0_____0 · 6 months ago
Begun, the clone wars have.
incognito124 · 6 months ago
Are you serious?
tasuki · 6 months ago
I'm always surprised by comments like yours. Do you see anything in that post that points to it being serious?
christiangenco · 6 months ago
I love this! I was similarly inspired by the Wait But Why article[1] and made a chrome plugin several years ago that shows this for my life every time I open a new Chrome window[2]. It's also a handy countdown for big events like vacations or The Singularity (which starts in 7,259 days) that I want some time to prepare for.

Life is precious and finite. Memento mori.

1. https://waitbutwhy.com/2014/05/life-weeks.html

2. https://res.cloudinary.com/genco/image/upload/w_1200/v173967...