Readit News logoReadit News
rdsubhas · 2 years ago
I'm all in on FF on desktop.

The only thing stopping on mobile for last 4-5 years is Translations. Project Bergamot is incredibly successful, thanks again to Mozilla for investing in this! Open Translation is such an important thing, it's a game changer.

It went from beta to addon to bring built into desktop Firefox since the latest release. No words can express the amount of gratitude for this. Now, just waiting for it to be enabled in android builds.

Edit: Another not so highlighted feature of Firefox is: Mac always shows Chrome as "significantly consuming energy". But never for Firefox. I don't know what magic they did here.

Edit 2: Don't get me started on the benefits of containers, profiles and temporary containers as a default.

gpchelkin · 2 years ago
I struggled so long with having to use Chrome for translations on Android until I found out that my favourite translating extension works with mobile Firefox just perfectly. See [3] on how to install it in Firefox Beta (maybe this method or even the extension itself is already available in Firefox Release).

[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/traduzir-pagi... [2] https://github.com/FilipePS/Traduzir-paginas-web [3] https://www.ghacks.net/2022/10/20/firefox-beta-for-android-n...

seba_dos1 · 2 years ago
The best time to switch to Firefox was many years ago. The second best time is now.
hotnfresh · 2 years ago
I switched when it was Phoenix.

I stopped liking it some time around v2. Maybe late 1.x series, don’t remember.

I left over a decade ago.

beej71 · 2 years ago
Well, probably they haven't changed it at all in the last 10 years, right?
twiceaday · 2 years ago
This is such a bad saying. I guess all the people who switched this year should have waited until now, because now is a better time to switch?
rdlw · 2 years ago
It's not a bad saying, proverbs don't have to be mathematically rigorous to be resonant and get a point across.
seba_dos1 · 2 years ago
The point of the saying is that it's a rolling "now".
seeknotfind · 2 years ago
Firefox extensions on mobile are already a game changer. I switched a few months ago.

The only downside so far: the way you manage/view downloads isn't so great/intuitive.

ducktective · 2 years ago
I wish Firefox mobile put tabs on the bottom of the screen so it's more accessible to switch back and forth. Also the two-column layout of tab viewer is a subpar experience IMO.

edit: Thanks to the replies, I figured 1) You can put the address bar at the bottom of screen 2) You can swipe on address bar to traverse through the tabs and 3) You can change the tab viewer layout to list view.

(Still, I wished there was an option to list tabs on the bottom like the way Chrome does in on Android.)

longstation · 2 years ago
You can do that. It even asks you whether to put it at the bottom when you run Firefox (Android, not sure about iOS) the first time.
JohnFen · 2 years ago
The biggest pain point with Android FF for me is that there's no way to get it to close all of the tabs when you close the application.

I have to go through and close each tab one by one first. It's driving me up the wall.

Deleted Comment

kawogi · 2 years ago
you can swipe the address bar to switch between tabs. Better than nothing.
forgotpwd16 · 2 years ago
A big issue Firefox mobile has is the refresh-tab-on-change be it switching to different tab or app.
seeknotfind · 2 years ago
Hmmm. This wasn't happening to me on airplane mode last week. I opened a bunch of tabs on Wikipedia with a connection, and I was able to read them on the plane. It didn't destroy the data.

Is Firefox getting low memory killed on your device?

czottmann · 2 years ago
Hi, macOS user here. I know Firefox is great, and I'd love to use it (again), but Mozilla's decision to remove all user-facing, OS-level scripting capabilities from it (i.e., AppleScript) made me drop it a few years ago.

Getting anything out of FF on macOS, locally, is a major pain in the ass, actually. Try to grab the current URL from the active tab…

I think it's a super-solid browser that unfortunately doesn't give a shit about the platform it's running on. Irritatingly, it's fine with being a black box, so much more than the Chromiums are (for all their various faults).

ssbash · 2 years ago
I’ve also given up on using Firefox on macOS. I used to be a hard core fan, but Mozilla consistently ignores bugs.

For example, years later Firefox still doesn’t support macOS password autofill api. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1650212

krackers · 2 years ago
+1 everything about firefox on macos just screams non-native. And I'm not just talking about minor things like context menus not behaving natively (maybe this was fixed recently, don't remember). There's major stuff that would seem to be trivial to implement that they just haven't bothered doing, like making sure the computer doesn't go to sleep when downloading files [1].

[1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=825914

div72 · 2 years ago
Weird thought, but have you tried using Selenium?

Seems like launching a browser tab with:

    from selenium import webdriver
    driver = webdriver.Firefox()
and navigating to duckduckgo.com:

    print(driver.current_url) # https://duckduckgo.com/
works.

czottmann · 2 years ago
I have. (Web dev here.) I know it works but I don't want to set up all the things just to get some basic scripting capability.

My point is that there is zero local API surface for interacting with the application. That's the reason why tools like Keyboard Maestro support Chromium-based browsers but not Firefox. Which, in return, doesn't help Firefox's popularity, because it's nigh impossible to work with it from other apps.

Disclaimer: I am in a weird spot here, for I am serious about automation both as a consumer and as a software maker -- I write macOS automation tools myself, e.g. https://actions.work/browser-actions

slaymaker1907 · 2 years ago
I'd switch if they would support the File System Access API. It's a really convenient API and IMO as someone who has worked with it extensively, is very secure. It supposedly has privacy concerns, but I think it would primarily be used for FOSS and hobby projects since Bigco likes to store all the data on their servers anyways, that's a feature and not a bug for them. In fact, I think it would be a security/privacy improvement since it would encourage storing data locally (privacy) and is way more secure than asking users to install a native app (which has access to pretty much everything on the device and not just the directory/file a user gives it access to).
Andrews54757 · 2 years ago
This! It is frustrating that web apps like draw.io can't save to file directly using Firefox. It gets old having to save a new file every time you make a change.

Beyond that, the File System API would also allow for streamed downloads directly from the web-app. This would allow for web-apps to generate large download files without having to store a copy on a database (external server or IndexedDB), which is a privacy improvement. The only way to do this now is by using convoluted techniques to essentially do a MITM to a fake endpoint [1].

[1] https://github.com/jimmywarting/StreamSaver.js

squigz · 2 years ago
> It supposedly has privacy concerns, but I think it would primarily be used for FOSS and hobby projects since Bigco likes to store all the data on their servers anyways

Privacy concerns don't only apply for entities of a particular size

p1mrx · 2 years ago
I have Firefox 120 on Android, but I'm unable to search for my extension (IPvFoo) on the addons page. It works on Firefox Nightly 122, and previously worked when Nightly was at 120.

Maybe the launch still requires a server-side change?

Moldoteck · 2 years ago
Afaik on ff original you'll still not have full list of extensions, just a more extended list
ravenstine · 2 years ago
I use Firefox at home and Chrome at work, and I can't imagine going back to Chrome or Chromium at home. Firefox in 2023 is in great shape as a piece of software.

Firefox could do some relatively small things to push it ahead of Chrome in some areas.

Bookmarks sorely need an overhaul. For instance, it'd be really nice if bookmarks could appear in a side-pane instead of a popup window, and allow the user to sort by chronological order. That would discourage me from keeping so many tabs open, which would be a good thing. Just having a dumping ground for interseting pages that I can easily access and search through would be a good thing. It would also be amazing if bookmarks, or something like bookmarks, could optionally capture and store the body text on the page for searching purposes or even personal archiving.

Searching tabs through the URL bar is pretty much broken and has been for years. Actually, I'm not sure that ever really worked. If I begin typing something that matches the title of a tab I have open, it rarely ever shows up as a URL bar suggestion. WTF? Is it really that hard to traverse a small array of tab titles and do a regex? I don't get it. What about full-text search across all the pages I have open? Can't do that either, apparently. Then again, who would actually want to do that? /s Ok, sorry for the sarcasm. Sort of. I mean this in the most constructive way possible. If I get time again, maybe I'll eventually fix these things in Firefox, but for now I hope someone at Mozilla reads this and decides it's worth fixing.

abdullahkhalids · 2 years ago
> it'd be really nice if bookmarks could appear in a side-pane instead of a popup window

Ctrl+B on linux/windows or I guess Command+B does exactly this.

> and allow the user to sort by chronological order

This is possible in the main bookmarks window. There is a sort by last modified option which should do the trick. It would indeed be nice to have this option in the sidebar.

The other features you mention are more appropriate for an extension.

Edit: I just found out that you can open the bookmarks window in a tab by visiting chrome://browser/content/places/places.xhtml

jakubmazanec · 2 years ago
Started using Firefox when it was still Phoenix, never stopped. Few years ago when they made Quantum, Firefox is awesome performance-wise: I can have hundreds of tabs open (with +- 50-90 always active), with no crashing (before Quantum, Firefox needed restarting once in a while). Chrome simply cannot handle that and consumes so much RAM.