Readit News logoReadit News
rdlw commented on Proof of Corn   proofofcorn.com/... · Posted by u/rocauc
snowmobile · 2 months ago
I mean, it's probably worse to pretend to be an actual customer, rather than sending some random message. The AI's obviously never going to actually lease any land, so all its doing is convincingly wasting their time. At least landlords are often quite unsympathetic, so it's probably fine to waste their time a bit.
rdlw · 2 months ago
What do you mean? There's $1370 earmarked for the lease.
rdlw commented on Meditation as Wakeful Relaxation: Unclenching Smooth Muscle   psychotechnology.substack... · Posted by u/surprisetalk
wubrr · 2 months ago
Many things have been practiced/studied for thousands of years - that alone isn't interesting or valuable imo.

What are the objective benefits of meditation - what is the exact/specific process and what specifically does it accomplish?

I can see how being in a silent reflective state and similar practices could have various effects and benefits (not that I know specifically what those are) - but what separates me zoning out in the shower/on the bus from actual meditation? How is 'guided' meditation when you're actively listening to someone else even the same thing?

Whenever I ask my meditating/'spiritual' friends about these things the response is basically vague undecipherable gibberish and allusions that it is unexplainable to someone like me who is not ready to accept the truths lol.

rdlw · 2 months ago
What does reading a great novel or starting a garden specifically accomplish? People do some things for reasons that aren't easily quantifiable. It seems to me that you are starting from the viewpoint that everything has to prove its worth before you accept it, even if millions of people before you have found it fulfilling and worthwhile, which does not seem productive.

If you had never read a book before, and someone was trying to convince you to try it, what could they point to that would fulfill all your criteria? Would it be enough to say it makes you smarter? That's not very specific. It sharpens your thinking? Makes you more empathetic? That would all seem like 'vague undecipherable gibberish' if you had no experience with it. They might resort to saying that it can connect you with a great dialogue that has been occurring for over two thousand years, but as you say, the fact that people have been doing it for thousands of years doesn't make it interesting or valuable.

Seeing a study that some part of the brain responds more quickly for up to 90 minutes after reading or that people with gardens live 0.28 years longer on average would not make me want to do those things more, because those are NOT the benefits of doing those things. You have to figure out what you're supposed to do with your one human life. Science is one tool, culture is another. Neither of them makes the other superfluous.

rdlw commented on I wanted a camera that doesn't exist, so I built it   medium.com/@cristi.baluta... · Posted by u/cyrc
twic · 2 months ago
> the Lumix lenses are crippled on Olympus bodies

Are they?

rdlw · 2 months ago
As mentioned in the next clause of that sentence, the aperture ring does not work on Olympus bodies.
rdlw commented on Using fewer syllables to express numbers   thegraycuber.github.io/fa... · Posted by u/adrianton3
pimlottc · 2 months ago
I got one that ended with “minus ninety halves”. How is “ninety halves” better than “forty-five”?
rdlw · 2 months ago
"Our first priority is to minimize sylliness, but I think our second priority should be to maximize silliness. And 'thirty squared twelfths' is certainly sillier."
rdlw commented on My productivity app is a never-ending .txt file (2020)   jeffhuang.com/productivit... · Posted by u/simonebrunozzi
tunaoftheland · 3 months ago
One thing I would like about this system is that I wouldn't get incessant notifications about things I haven't yet done lol. I do think that building a habit to check on a txt file periodically (like the author says) to stay on top of things is better for emotional health than a wall of notifications on the phone lock screen that I've been conditioned to just tap on and select "Remind me tomorrow " without even thinking.

Knowing myself, though, I don't think I'd keep up with this since it would take mental strength on my part to overthink the data structure for the task entry. I've been thinking about how I might also track emotional impact of my todo items on me. I wonder if the open nature of a txt file would be good for instant journaling about things that give me stress?

I really like having some guardrails when it comes to organizing thoughts so this system might not be for me. Also building up the daily habit to organize the todos at the end of each day is something I'd probably struggle with for a while. I do agree that is a great habit to have, still.

rdlw · 3 months ago
Maybe printing the first (last?) line of a file whenever a terminal is opened would work
rdlw commented on A new bridge links the math of infinity to computer science   quantamagazine.org/a-new-... · Posted by u/digital55
k_bx · 4 months ago
> All of modern mathematics is built on the foundation of set theory, the study of how to organize abstract collections of objects

What the hell. What about Type Theory?

rdlw · 4 months ago
Is there a collection of type theory axioms anywhere near as influential as ZF or ZFC?
rdlw commented on Looking for Hidden Gems in Scientific Literature   elicit.com/blog/literatur... · Posted by u/ravenical
NoMoreNicksLeft · 4 months ago
>There are on the order of 100 million papers [reference 2] published to date.

Does anyone else feel as if this (admittedly rough) estimate is off by an order of magnitude?

rdlw · 4 months ago
If 1% of the last 10 billion people to live were academics and published on average 5 papers (many only had one, i.e. their dissertation/thesis, but a small fraction will have had dozens or hundreds), that comes to 500 million.

I'm curious, do you think it's an order of magnitude too low or too high?

rdlw commented on Solving a million-step LLM task with zero errors   arxiv.org/abs/2511.09030... · Posted by u/Anon84
esafak · 4 months ago
A striking example of how not to present data. If the Cognizant AI team is here: please can you fix it in the next version of the paper?
rdlw · 4 months ago
I think it's a brilliant example of how to use data to make a point.

https://xkcd.com/1162/

rdlw commented on Denx (a.k.a. U-Boot) Retires   denx.de/... · Posted by u/synergy20
bitwize · 4 months ago
It's also the name of a mathematical vector derivative operator (∇).
rdlw · 4 months ago
Interesting, I only knew it as the del until now
rdlw commented on Willow quantum chip demonstrates verifiable quantum advantage on hardware   blog.google/technology/re... · Posted by u/AbhishekParmar
zingar · 5 months ago
What’s the difference between the claim that they’re making and what you say they haven’t done?
rdlw · 5 months ago
Saying something and doing something are different. They claim it is true, but they haven't demonstrated it by doing it.

If a company says they've built the fastest car in the world, a reasonable response is "ok, let's see it drive faster than any other car can", even though they already said that it can do that.

u/rdlw

KarmaCake day648January 3, 2020View Original