Readit News logoReadit News
randyrand · 2 years ago
Here is the link to the CSS code that generated the video animation, afaict: https://codepen.io/jasontyler/pen/qEXzOQ

But its not exactly the same, so maybe many other people have altered it.

fckthisguy · 2 years ago
To be clear, the copyright strike is for a small two second animation in the middle of a much larger video.

The correct course of action here is for Mr Beast to apologize to the animation owner (AO) and to reupload the video with the animation removed. Or, to license the animation.

YouTube should then lift demonization.

AO didn't suffer any damage so there's no compensation owed. Legally, AO might be able to chase this but the payout will likely be far less than the court costs.

Mr Beast seems to be a pretty upstanding guy, so I wouldn't be surprised if he licensed the animation for a generous price.

Ultimately, it was the editor who messed up so the Mr Beast team need to review their processes.

xethos · 2 years ago
> Mr Beast seems to be a pretty upstanding guy

How many people would have said the same about Linus Sebastion before Gamers Nexus' Steve Burke pointed out how they treated Billet Labs?

Mr. Beast's actual job is cultivating a public persona. Being good at that doesn't make him a good person.

lotsoweiners · 2 years ago
Having watched plenty of both of their videos, if I had to guess which was an asshole I’d have guessed Linus.
torartc · 2 years ago
How is this different than a big brand stealing a design and putting it on a Tshirt? The product in question is a video and it used art without permission.
LordShredda · 2 years ago
The difference is that YouTube has a user friendly button to ruin people's channels, while big brands actually need a lawyer to send a C&D
reportgunner · 2 years ago
Last time I checked MrBeast was a big brand though.
hmcq6 · 2 years ago
"ruin" ohhh puleaze.

It turns off monetization for one video. Unless you fuck up 3 times, then maybe it "ruins" your channel.

And if it's a fraudulent strike the person who filed the fraudulent strike gets a strike. Meanwhile you can send as many phony C&Ds as you want.

Jka9rhnDJos · 2 years ago
Because all public code on Codepen is MIT Licensed?

https://blog.codepen.io/documentation/terms-of-service/#your...

yunohn · 2 years ago
This is more equivalent to a transition image in a video featuring the T-shirt at some stage, and part of the transition is copyrighted, not the shirt itself.
rabbits_2002 · 2 years ago
weird case for sure, but if you run a billion dollar youtube channel you probably should vet your assets for copyright
josefresco · 2 years ago
Not a lot of context here. Was the "CSS toggle" an image inside a video?
CharlesW · 2 years ago
Yes, it's poorly titled. The copyright was for the image/animation.
xsmasher · 2 years ago
I still don't understand. What was the topic of the video, and how was the image/animation involved?

Deleted Comment

andrewmunsell · 2 years ago
Non-Twitter, archive link: https://archive.is/R2sRo
mock-possum · 2 years ago
*supposedly