Readit News logoReadit News
lotsoweiners commented on Ask HN: What are your predictions for 2026?    · Posted by u/mfrw
tetris11 · 2 days ago
> Major breakthroughs in robotics research thanks to ultra scalable simulation software and RL

I was hoping that plumbers, electricians, construction, factory workers still had another 10-20 years before being priced out of the work pool.

I was also hoping we had that much time to use threat of mass protest to keep our politicians aligned.

I genuinely think it's game over for 99% of humanity's interests once the top wealthiest individuals and/or their governments can simply deploy robots en masse.

lotsoweiners · 2 days ago
Hey if developers and office jobs get fucked by AI “promises” then fuck blue collar as well. You need a united population to destroy the interests of the 1%.
lotsoweiners commented on Arizona city rejects data center after AI lobbying push   politico.com/news/2025/12... · Posted by u/ohjeez
simianwords · 8 days ago
Is this what NIMBY means?
lotsoweiners · 8 days ago
If so then call me a NIMBY. Not a Chandler but in Gilbert, the town next door. No need for data centers here or anywhere else around here either.
lotsoweiners commented on How private equity is changing housing   theatlantic.com/ideas/202... · Posted by u/harambae
bilbo0s · 12 days ago
Let's be honest, it's not even that.

It's more like "relative to historic trends, many people want houses [in desirable areas] who can't afford the current prices."

Building tons of new houses outside of the hot areas that all these people want to live would still elicit cries of a shortage and an affordability crisis. Because there are currently affordable places outside of hot areas, but not very many takers.

It's a really tough nut to crack. Because how do you reorient the demand to those areas that have the supply? It's not easy. We can't seem to do it currently, and there's no real plan to do it if even if we could somehow build even more housing. We'd have to build lots of housing only in hot areas. Which sounds easy enough until you realize the economics don't make sense and even on the off chance that you could, it would only generate more demand.

First order of business however should be to find a clever way to stop abuses like the ones outlined in the article. The housing that would free up in the hot areas would not be near enough to meet the demand, but if we stop that nonsense at least we're not "digging the hole deeper" so to speak.

lotsoweiners · 11 days ago
> Because how do you reorient the demand to those areas that have the supply? It's not easy. We can't seem to do it currently, and there's no real plan to do it if even if we could somehow build even more housing.

Uh have you heard of telework? I am sure that both federal and state governments could incentivize companies to offer telework instead of some forced RTO situation.

lotsoweiners commented on Is America's jobs market nearing a cliff?   economist.com/finance-and... · Posted by u/harambae
r33b33 · 21 days ago
Are you ready for great age of suffering? Because there will be no saving, no UBI, no plan B. This is it. This is the end of careers and beginning of centuries of misery. AI will replace everyone except around 3%. If you aren't one of those 3%, start accepting the reality of infinite pain.
lotsoweiners · 20 days ago
Or you know the 97% can just kill the AI. I’d probably go that route.
lotsoweiners commented on Doge 'doesn't exist' with eight months left on its charter   reuters.com/world/us/doge... · Posted by u/the_mitsuhiko
phantasmish · a month ago
All they had to do was skim any decent daily, weekly, or monthly newspaper or news magazine in 2024. Folks whose only news sources are Facebook shares and Fox News are simply stupid. The reason they don’t know WTF is going on may be due to their news sources, but they chose those. That’s a really stupid thing to do.
lotsoweiners · a month ago
> Folks whose only news sources are Facebook shares and Fox News are simply stupid.

Maybe or maybe not. What I do know is that they are large in number and a political opponent should realize this and strategize accordingly.

lotsoweiners commented on Google boss says AI investment boom has 'elements of irrationality'   bbc.com/news/articles/cwy... · Posted by u/jillesvangurp
formerly_proven · a month ago
> It's do-able, but the housing crisis needs to be resolved.

Why? Almost everywhere a majority of people (and certainly the majority of voters) are already invested in housing and do not want their investment to loose value.

> Specifically, both house prices and interest need to go down heavily. Sadly, they used higher interest to try to lower prices, and that didn't really bring prices down.

People are more willing to spend an ever-growing share of their dual-incomes on housing, which drives housing prices modulo interest. So interest has no actual effect on housing affordability, since it doesn't influence how much people are willing to spend. If you lower interest, prices are simply going to rise such that people spend the same % of their income on housing. If you increase interest, prices will (eventually, slowly, since this is a seller-dominated market) fall to match.

> More supply isn't helping much either, as there is no diversity of supply, and builds aren't undercutting the market yet.

New builds will never be cheaper than existing housing stock. Low-cost new housing is a mirage; new housing is premium by construction.

lotsoweiners · a month ago
> If you increase interest, prices will (eventually, slowly, since this is a seller-dominated market) fall to match.

That may “fix” home prices but not the important thing to most, monthly payments.

lotsoweiners commented on .NET 10   devblogs.microsoft.com/do... · Posted by u/runesoerensen
oaiey · a month ago
There is no way a reasonable person would not deploy to Linux and postgres for cost reasons alone. No one wants to pay Microsoft or Oracle money for databases, operating systems or frameworks nowadays.
lotsoweiners · a month ago
I beg to differ. Every government agency I’ve worked at will gladly pay SQL server license fees.
lotsoweiners commented on Apple reports fourth quarter results   apple.com/newsroom/2025/1... · Posted by u/mfiguiere
stockresearcher · 2 months ago
Actually, in modern times you can buy an oil extraction pump off Amazon for $100, making oil changes so much easier than they were 40 years ago! A lot of [especially European] cars have the filter accessible from the top, meaning that you can change oil in 15 minutes in any apartment parking space by doing little more than popping the hood!
lotsoweiners · 2 months ago
I’ve done oil changes decades ago but don’t bother anymore since I don’t feel like jacking the car up but using an oil extraction tool from the top does sound intriguing. Can you replace the filter from the top or does that require a jack? Also, does the filter need to be replaced each time?
lotsoweiners commented on Taking money off the table   zachholman.com/posts/mone... · Posted by u/holman
abuani · 2 months ago
Just to reiterate the point the person above you made, but in far simpler terms: independence can be far greater return on your personal well-being then maximizing gains. I'm willing to "lose" out on $50-$100k over the lifetime of my mortgage in exchange for never needing to make a payment on the house again
lotsoweiners · 2 months ago
The gov and insurance company will still want their taste. I think my escrow portion is probably at least 1/5 of my mortgage payment.
lotsoweiners commented on YouTube Just Ate TV. It's Only Getting Started   hollywoodreporter.com/bus... · Posted by u/wallflower
wilg · 2 months ago
There are no commercials with YouTube Premium, which is totally worth it. Why people feel entitled to pirate things still is incredible. People fundamentally hate paying artists for their work even though it's incredibly cheap, because they can come up with some bogus way to blame a corporation and feel, like you said here, laughably, like Luke Skywalker. Insane.
lotsoweiners · 2 months ago
Youtube premium is like $15/mo. I believe it was more for the family plan I used to have. I canceled it like a year ago and don’t feel I miss it at all. I just don’t think Google is a company I should ever give money to directly. If some 3rd party service blocked YouTube for $15/mo I’d be more inclined to pay them vs Google.

u/lotsoweiners

KarmaCake day587May 26, 2021View Original