Readit News logoReadit News
19h · 3 years ago
If you're afraid of crawlers that will feed into AI datasets, why not just render images into canvas elements?

This kind of watermark makes images bad for everyone, not just the AI. Do you really want to see this on every website you visit?

wongarsu · 3 years ago
Most artists don't have control over the way their image is rendered. They just use Deviantart or Instagram, because that's where the communities are.
nomel · 3 years ago
Sounds like a good feature to attract artists, with relatively little effort.
rnkn · 3 years ago
As always, the best way to protect your house is with the law, not a better lock.

Regulation is constructive, deregulation is destructive.

Loocid · 3 years ago
I would strongly argue you need both. There will always be people willing to break the law.
Paul-Craft · 3 years ago
And yet my car got stolen yesterday.

Got anything else?

dymk · 3 years ago
so is regulatory capture constructive or destructive?
jahewson · 3 years ago
This is delightfully misguided because diffusion models work by learning to remove noise.
ballenvironment · 3 years ago
Diffusion models learn how to denoise noise into images that are similar to training data. But what if the training data itself is noisy? Then the model will learn to produce noisy images also.

There's a reason why they try to remove noisy/blurry/bad q images, because simply put, what you put in is what you get out. While I don't agree with intentionally destroying the quality of images (ruins it for humans as well as AI), I don't see why this wouldn't work.

dymk · 3 years ago
Protects the art from being enjoyed by the human, too

Dead Comment