I might be wrong, but this update is addressing a real problem that company is facing. This is not some hypothetical, slippery slope kinda thing.
For instance, in Belarus right now a lot of engineers seek to get out the country due to dictatorship regime. Poland and neighbourhood countries offer emergency visa plans for people in trouble (business harbour visa).
I think what happened is that GitLab started receiving a lot of emergency requests to be relocated immediately that did not comply the existing policy. Hence the update.
> For instance, in Belarus right now a lot of engineers seek to get out the country due to dictatorship regime. Poland and neighbourhood countries offer emergency visa plans for people in trouble (business harbour visa).
Would this apply to a typical Belarusian engineer in Belarus, though? They'd be White, European, and (correct me if I'm wrong) violence there seems mainly directed at protesters and protest leaders. It seems to me like this tailored for the kinds of racial and sexual minorities the US likes to obsess about.
> Tenure of less than 1 year at GitLab may be possibly waived as a requirement if:
The racial classification found in this document seems surreal for me (I'm from SW Europe). Seen from here, the US racial categories often seem absurd.
First off, there's hardly anyone other than europeans in East European countries. And I don't see why Gitlab engineers wouldn't be involved in the protests. They're probably well-educated and therefore statistically more likely to care about the political situation.
yeah.... a good friend of mine (dual citizen) who manages a large engineering team there for US startup was picked up randomly not at the protest shortly after they started, thrown in jail, denied access to consular services, his very good lawyers got his jail term taken down from 15 days to 12 days despite the guys who picked him up not showing for the hearing or testifying that he was in fact not at the protest when they picked him up. a couple weeks after they started rubber stamping everyone picked up for protests with 2 years regardless of actual involvement. this isn't even including the extreme random violence some people are subjected to and horrible general conditions. fuck everything about this attitude - belarus is just around the corner from civil war it's not cool at all.
In Belarus we’ve had employees arrested for literally being outside at the wrong time, even if it’s just to look at what’s going on from the front of their building. Things have calmed down somewhat since then, but they’ve also put in border controls so people can’t leave the country. You literally need to get smuggled over the border. Thankfully I hear that is not too difficult. The visa situation once you get to wherever you go isn’t awesome tho, since you’re still at the mercy of a large bureaucracy.
Belarus is currently considered one of the least safe places in Europe to be LGBTQ+. I'm not sure if they enacted the Russian-style "anti gay propaganda" law they spitballed a few years ago, but even without it, it's safe to say LGBTQ+ people in Belarus are "being mistreated".
In my experience tech workers in Eastern Europe are not significantly more progressive than other residents, but if Gitlab's company culture is at least somewhat progressive, it's likely that it attracts people in those countries who tend towards the progressive end of their respective countries' political spectrum. Given that Belarus has a very low bar for what the government considers a "political activist", it's reasonable to assume that some of these people might find themselves in trouble without having to go as far as donning black masks and tossing rocks at police officers.
It's also worth keeping in mind that software development is one of the professions easiest to get into as a marginalized person because you can teach yourself enough to get started and especially when freelancing it's possible to work without ever meeting the other person face-to-face. You'd be surprised how many programmers are queer, disabled or neurodivergent.
> For instance, in Belarus right now a lot of engineers seek to get out the country due to dictatorship regime.
It’s funny cause I heard the same in 2014 in Ukraine. Why exactly is it funny? Because it seemed like a made-up problem. Engineers weren’t hunted down. Instead, they were driving new cars from their new homes to their new offices while drinking artisan coffee. But for some reason they wanted to be a victim. I guess goes in the same bucket as “I’ll leave the US if Trump gets elected!”
I'm not saying you're entirely wrong, as engineers are often very privileged positions in society and the people who suffer the most from dictatorship and civil wars are definitely not engineers, because any regime needs the engineers to collaborate with the powers that be and so treats them rather well (compared to the global population).
However, likening Trump's election with the civil war in Ukraine or dictatorship in Belarus is definitely disconnected from reality. Under Trump like before, and as in most pretend-democracies of the global north, cops have been a force of occupation of popular districts and have murdered a certain number of citizens. But in Ukraine, we're talking about an actual civil war with barricades in the city centers, with militias fighting off each other with kalashnikovs. In Belarus, we're talking about state police and intelligence services physically torturing activists to force confessions (whether true or not, who knows?).
Once again, i'm not saying such things don't exist in the global north or are perfect around here... Far from it. The power structures are very similar, but the level of repression is considerably higher. The dangers we face here are no match for what happens in BUR (Belarus-Ukraine-Russia).
I can't imagine I would ever actually use this type of support, but knowing it is there increases the odds that I would apply for a job at Gitlab. It makes me admire the company's culture more than probably any other benefit I have seen offered in my time in tech.
Mistreatment is how pay is adjusted to location assuring poor areas stay poor even though the developer is performing the same task any others in higher paying regions. If cost of living is really a factor why does their product cost the same globally?
I wouldn't say that is mistreatment. It is a business transaction where one party has more leverage than the other. 99% of the time the employee in the lower income region gets a far high salary than they expect to get at another employer. So it is not like they are being coerced into a "unable to make ends meet" levels of income.
Realistically, the upper limit of a salary is usually determined by the average value the employee will bring to the company because profit is derived from surplus value. This value may range from very direct (number of product produced per unit of time) or very indirect (making the rest of the team happy to increase their overall productivity and reduce employee turnover).
The lower limit is generally whatever the company can get away with. This has legal factors (e.g. minimum wage laws) as well as regional (e.g. "market rate", unemployment rates) but ultimately the candidate has to make the call what they can (or have no other choice but to) accept.
Crucially, the surplus value only hinges on the value generated and the expenses of employing that person (mostly salary and benefits but cross-state and internationally there may be legal costs avoidable by hiring locally).
If you live in an area with a low cost of living and the company's upper limit is defined by the relative cost of living, they're going to extract a lot more surplus value from your labor than if you live in an area with a high cost of living but maintain the same personal cost of living because you manage to be extraordinarily frugal.
That you make a lot of money relative to your local peers does not mean the company isn't disproportionately extracting surplus value from you (or in other words: paying you in lower proportion to the value you generate than others). If everyone else in your neighborhood is paid a penny and you earn a dime that does not mean I'm not exploiting you when I pay the locals a dollar for the same generated value.
That GitLab only varies pay and not the cost of their software and services demonstrates that they understand this. The value their services provide depends entirely on the customer's market (which is btw why a lot of initial SaaS pricing is based on US startup culture where company expenses are measured as burn rates rather than profitability, even if it makes the services cost prohibitive in other markets).
Also of course geographically distributed employees will find it harder to unionize (even more so formally because of different jurisdictions and labor laws) or organize and are less likely to seriously develop solidarity in a way that could get in the way of making a profit.
There are arguments for the destructive impact of foreign companies paying above market rate but it's absurd to think companies that use geographical salary ranges do so out of concern for regional competitors.
I like this idea but I wonder whether the company has considered how many people would qualify, or if they just don’t employ enough people for it to be an actual slippery slope for them.
All women in America, for starters, per their definition. Not that qualified Americans have any problem moving to Europe. But maybe Arabs in Israel, Copts in Egypt, Russians in Ukraine, Zoroastrians in Iran, lots and lots of ethnicities in China, atheists in most countries…
Nice to know their training materials are free from bias though!
I don‘t know if the slippery slope goes far enough to be a problem. Effectively, if you‘re in a position to work at GitLab, the netherlands are happy to have you. They could relocate the entire company there and it might not be a problem.
Slippery slope towards what exactly? What problems do you foresee? Do you foresee that all women in america, per your example, would:
1. Start working for GitLab
2. Want to move to the Netherlands?
If they employ enough people, the slippery slope is that every employee who wants to live in NL has a claim on help to do so, and so the company is no longer geo-neutral but ends up, like so many other companies, having the “talent” in a rich country and all the “fungibles” elsewhere.
But as others have pointed out, in real life NL would probably be happy to have up to 100% of their actual employees immigrate so it may be just well-intentioned virtue signaling.
Considering the big disclaimer "you still need to qualify to immigrate to the Netherland under the visa process", what do they have to lose? All they are doing is saying they will support anyone who wants to make the move.
> Underrepresented Group This can be defined as a group whose percentage of the population in a given group is lower than their percentage of the population of country, community, organization or otherwise.
So basically they dictate policy based on population representation instead of what's actually coming through education. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
> Gitlab created the goal of 50% of all senior leadership should be women by December 2021 to address the imbalance within this underrepresented group.
I wouldn't be too thrilled having my career advancement sacrificed in the pursuit of 50/50 men/woman representation.
As someone who does not live in the US, that strikes me as an incredibly spoiled and American-centric perspective. You do realize that the US is not the only country with human rights issues, and that the domestic issues in the US pale in comparison to much of the world? Consider the domestic issues in Latin America, Africa and the Middle East.
For Americans part of disproportionately disenfranchised groups, this is better than asylum applications to EU/EFTA/EEA countries because with asylum you have to work a shitty job for a while to prove you can integrate. Whereas with a VC backed tech company you already have a familiar experience and comfortable relatable surroundings.
Yes, US citizens get accepted into asylum processes. No, not all countries offer transparency into their asylum process or metrics.
> asylum applications to EU/EFTA/EEA countries because with asylum you have to work a shitty job for a while to prove you can integrate
Which countries are those? While the UK was an EU member, it required that asylum applicants not work, and I believe that's not an unusual restriction.
Throw-away account, but this is good. Wish more companies did this kind of thing. I've been mistreated most of my life for my sexuality, even here in Sweden. Can't stand it much longer...
EDIT: To clarify, I'm being bullied, not oppressed by the govt. Swedes are known to not reach out and are truly the worst kind of friends that leave you on a whim if they don't relate to you.
You do realize that making broad sweeping criticizing of an entire group of people based on your personal experiences with a limited amount of members of their group is exactly why these situation happen?
I wish the best for you and nobody should be discriminated for their sexual preference as long as everybody is consenting, and if we want the situation to become better we must all work to improve it, so make you sure you don't do that sort of over generalization and simplification just like you wish people wouldn't do it towards you.
You're right. I didn't set out to "win an argument", just share my personal experience.
In terms of the limitations that applies to what I said, it is clear from context. And they are the majority; their voices will get heard anyway.
People think that Sweden is some kind of humanitarian utopia, while in reality there is more homophobia than people realize, and e.g. a relatively high-profile anti-Semitic case just recently...
Being an all-remote company allows team members to choose to live and work where they want. This benefit provides folks more choices when deciding where to live and work.
CEO is Dutch and probably has a Dutch entity. Work related immigration is relatively easy for Netherlands, especially compared to USA. Recently the salary requirements have been lowered.
Edit: Anyways I like this. Love the idea of companies taking over for helping out the underrepresented in their ranks. This is a natural progression from remote work.
1. 1. 1. is on purpose, the Markdown rendering software will number it. This has the advantage that you don't need to update the numbers in the source if you move/add/remove lines.
"Underrepresented" is in parentheses. So I'm interpreting this as saying that the policy is not specific to members of underrepresented groups, but was crafted with underrepresented groups in mind.
I think it does matter whether you're a member of a group that is mistreated as a group vs. whether you are mistreated as a person; it's easier to be confident that you're understanding the situation correctly if there's a lot of data about an entire group vs. a claim that you individually are unsafe/mistreated (which could just be "I am mistreated because my community is ostracizing me for having committed a crime" or whatever). It is obviously possible to be mistreated as a group even if you are from a local-majority group (cf. apartheid in South Africa).
As to why they mentioned it even if it's in parentheses - there's a link to a page, and elsewhere on the page they mention that it's a cultural value to include more people from "underrepresented groups" in their definition (https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/inclusion/#gitlabs-...).
For instance, in Belarus right now a lot of engineers seek to get out the country due to dictatorship regime. Poland and neighbourhood countries offer emergency visa plans for people in trouble (business harbour visa).
I think what happened is that GitLab started receiving a lot of emergency requests to be relocated immediately that did not comply the existing policy. Hence the update.
Would this apply to a typical Belarusian engineer in Belarus, though? They'd be White, European, and (correct me if I'm wrong) violence there seems mainly directed at protesters and protest leaders. It seems to me like this tailored for the kinds of racial and sexual minorities the US likes to obsess about.
> Tenure of less than 1 year at GitLab may be possibly waived as a requirement if:
> - You are a member of a(n [underrepresented](https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/inclusion/#definiti...)) group that is unsafe or in any way mistreated in your country.
> - Violence in your country does not provide a safe environment.
The racial classification found in this document seems surreal for me (I'm from SW Europe). Seen from here, the US racial categories often seem absurd.
In my experience tech workers in Eastern Europe are not significantly more progressive than other residents, but if Gitlab's company culture is at least somewhat progressive, it's likely that it attracts people in those countries who tend towards the progressive end of their respective countries' political spectrum. Given that Belarus has a very low bar for what the government considers a "political activist", it's reasonable to assume that some of these people might find themselves in trouble without having to go as far as donning black masks and tossing rocks at police officers.
It's also worth keeping in mind that software development is one of the professions easiest to get into as a marginalized person because you can teach yourself enough to get started and especially when freelancing it's possible to work without ever meeting the other person face-to-face. You'd be surprised how many programmers are queer, disabled or neurodivergent.
EDIT: QED?
Deleted Comment
Like any company they are willing to help the good employees that they want to keep.
It’s funny cause I heard the same in 2014 in Ukraine. Why exactly is it funny? Because it seemed like a made-up problem. Engineers weren’t hunted down. Instead, they were driving new cars from their new homes to their new offices while drinking artisan coffee. But for some reason they wanted to be a victim. I guess goes in the same bucket as “I’ll leave the US if Trump gets elected!”
However, likening Trump's election with the civil war in Ukraine or dictatorship in Belarus is definitely disconnected from reality. Under Trump like before, and as in most pretend-democracies of the global north, cops have been a force of occupation of popular districts and have murdered a certain number of citizens. But in Ukraine, we're talking about an actual civil war with barricades in the city centers, with militias fighting off each other with kalashnikovs. In Belarus, we're talking about state police and intelligence services physically torturing activists to force confessions (whether true or not, who knows?).
Once again, i'm not saying such things don't exist in the global north or are perfect around here... Far from it. The power structures are very similar, but the level of repression is considerably higher. The dangers we face here are no match for what happens in BUR (Belarus-Ukraine-Russia).
See also: https://abc-belarus.org/?lang=en for information about anti-anarchist repression in Belarus, or https://pramen.io/en/ for wider political analysis
The employee ends up doing pretty well.
The lower limit is generally whatever the company can get away with. This has legal factors (e.g. minimum wage laws) as well as regional (e.g. "market rate", unemployment rates) but ultimately the candidate has to make the call what they can (or have no other choice but to) accept.
Crucially, the surplus value only hinges on the value generated and the expenses of employing that person (mostly salary and benefits but cross-state and internationally there may be legal costs avoidable by hiring locally).
If you live in an area with a low cost of living and the company's upper limit is defined by the relative cost of living, they're going to extract a lot more surplus value from your labor than if you live in an area with a high cost of living but maintain the same personal cost of living because you manage to be extraordinarily frugal.
That you make a lot of money relative to your local peers does not mean the company isn't disproportionately extracting surplus value from you (or in other words: paying you in lower proportion to the value you generate than others). If everyone else in your neighborhood is paid a penny and you earn a dime that does not mean I'm not exploiting you when I pay the locals a dollar for the same generated value.
That GitLab only varies pay and not the cost of their software and services demonstrates that they understand this. The value their services provide depends entirely on the customer's market (which is btw why a lot of initial SaaS pricing is based on US startup culture where company expenses are measured as burn rates rather than profitability, even if it makes the services cost prohibitive in other markets).
Also of course geographically distributed employees will find it harder to unionize (even more so formally because of different jurisdictions and labor laws) or organize and are less likely to seriously develop solidarity in a way that could get in the way of making a profit.
There are arguments for the destructive impact of foreign companies paying above market rate but it's absurd to think companies that use geographical salary ranges do so out of concern for regional competitors.
All women in America, for starters, per their definition. Not that qualified Americans have any problem moving to Europe. But maybe Arabs in Israel, Copts in Egypt, Russians in Ukraine, Zoroastrians in Iran, lots and lots of ethnicities in China, atheists in most countries…
Nice to know their training materials are free from bias though!
https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/inclusion/#definiti...
But as others have pointed out, in real life NL would probably be happy to have up to 100% of their actual employees immigrate so it may be just well-intentioned virtue signaling.
Which is also a valid recruiting strategy!
I also wonder what their precise definition of "underrepresented" is.
https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/inclusion/#gitlabs-...
https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/inclusion/#definiti...
So basically they dictate policy based on population representation instead of what's actually coming through education. Sounds like a recipe for disaster.
I wouldn't be too thrilled having my career advancement sacrificed in the pursuit of 50/50 men/woman representation.
Your comment assumes that Gitlab can't find as many qualified women as they can men.
You've decided (knowing nothing about the women except their gender) that they are only being hired for those roles because of their gender.
It's something that could crop up all over the show.
The US is the most privileged country on the planet, just look at the per capita CO2 emissions with their private AC and swimming pools, SUVs, etc.
Yes, US citizens get accepted into asylum processes. No, not all countries offer transparency into their asylum process or metrics.
Which countries are those? While the UK was an EU member, it required that asylum applicants not work, and I believe that's not an unusual restriction.
EDIT: To clarify, I'm being bullied, not oppressed by the govt. Swedes are known to not reach out and are truly the worst kind of friends that leave you on a whim if they don't relate to you.
I wish the best for you and nobody should be discriminated for their sexual preference as long as everybody is consenting, and if we want the situation to become better we must all work to improve it, so make you sure you don't do that sort of over generalization and simplification just like you wish people wouldn't do it towards you.
In terms of the limitations that applies to what I said, it is clear from context. And they are the majority; their voices will get heard anyway.
People think that Sweden is some kind of humanitarian utopia, while in reality there is more homophobia than people realize, and e.g. a relatively high-profile anti-Semitic case just recently...
Make of that what you will.
Deleted Comment
Please hire me as QA.
Edit: Anyways I like this. Love the idea of companies taking over for helping out the underrepresented in their ranks. This is a natural progression from remote work.
Deleted Comment
In what countries are over-represented groups mistreated by systems or institutions?
I think it does matter whether you're a member of a group that is mistreated as a group vs. whether you are mistreated as a person; it's easier to be confident that you're understanding the situation correctly if there's a lot of data about an entire group vs. a claim that you individually are unsafe/mistreated (which could just be "I am mistreated because my community is ostracizing me for having committed a crime" or whatever). It is obviously possible to be mistreated as a group even if you are from a local-majority group (cf. apartheid in South Africa).
As to why they mentioned it even if it's in parentheses - there's a link to a page, and elsewhere on the page they mention that it's a cultural value to include more people from "underrepresented groups" in their definition (https://about.gitlab.com/company/culture/inclusion/#gitlabs-...).