Also, apple’s crazy profitability means they may offer something like the mini that doesn’t sell as well as their laptop, while intel is ruthlessly cutting out things that aren’t part of their core business because of their monetary issues.
If Intel can’t compete with cheaper manufacturers and its not hitting their internal required rate of return then it may no longer justify having that business unit at all.
> revealed that it plans to launch its chatbot in private beta sometime in 2023
Last year, kids in school were already writing essays with ChatGPT.
..........
> The formula looks at the variables below, and then spits out a "number" for every Googler. Each PA VP gets a % to cut, and as such there is a threshold. Anyone below that threshold gets RIF'd.
Variables are:
1) Location of labor. US Premium Plus was largely impacted versus cheaper areas. 2) Tenure and performance in level. 3) "Runway" of comp. (e.g. base salary vs MRP. eg. .8 of MRP Googlers have a long runway, vs 1.x of MRP Googlers are basically top of band, and 'tenured' with no runway except promo 4) Promo velocity
..........
Taken from https://www.teamblind.com/post/THE-DEFINITIVE-GOOGLE-LAYOFF-...
Disclaimer: Googler, but no particular internal-only information backing my impression of the above
Anyways, I didn't understand the acronyms so I decided to feed it to GPT and it definitely made it easier to understand:
Google is using a formula to determine which employees will be laid off (known as RIF: Reduction in Force)
The formula takes into account various factors such as location of labor (with US Premium Plus areas being more heavily impacted), tenure and performance in the current level, "runway" of compensation (the difference between base salary and maximum potential salary), and promo velocity (how quickly the employee has been promoted within the company)
This formula calculates a "number" for each employee based on these factors
Each Product Area Vice President (PA VP) is given a percentage of employees they must lay off
Employees with a score below a certain threshold, determined by the formula, will be laid off
Google and Facebook are the clear leaders in AI and they been spending a lot of money building out their AI infrastructure over the last decade. You haven't heard much about Microsoft's investments other than them buying rights to OpenAI models. Seems like they could have saved a lot of money if they started investing years ago.
Google bought DeepMind for 400m 8 years ago. You could argue DeepMind is on the same level or above OpenAI.
Google and Facebook might be better at some things, and maybe Apple too. But none of them has brought to market a chatbot that works pretty well(and not just as a party trick) and is very accessible to anyone on the Internet. I would love it if open up Siri such that I can communicate with it on a site just like ChatGPT.
It got me thinking that for every developer who manages to get frontpage on HN about their employer's dishonesty, there are probably more out there who had been screwed the same way.