I have mixed feelings already about Prime Video, as a watching experience I find it quite annoying because I'll find a movie I'd like to watch only to find I have to pay another $5 to watch it. With the other services, I know if a movie comes up on the display, I can watch it without further cost.
I'm fairly sensitive to adverts, I really don't like seeing them, largely because I've isolated myself from them. The fewer you see, the more unsettling they are, the blatant attractive factor of them, do.not.want. And anther $40/yr is too much.
Apparently, dropping Prime with the shopping really does not impact the speed of delivery or cost. I'm already often selecting delayed delivery. With the increased prices, it's hard to justify the $140/yr.
javascript:var ni%3Ddocument.createNodeIterator(document.documentElement,NodeFilter.SHOW_ELEMENT,function(node)%7Breturn document.defaultView.getComputedStyle(node,null).getPropertyValue("position").match(/sticky|fixed/) %3F NodeFilter.FILTER_ACCEPT : NodeFilter.FILTER_REJECT%3B%7D)%3Bwhile(currentNode%3Dni.nextNode())%7Bconsole.log(currentNode.remove())%3B%7D
(I mean that's not a crazy notion: if you have any warm mug and fill it with cold stuff, the warm mug will heat up your cold stuff.)
You are right that if you keep your mug closed, there shouldn't be any energy flowing back into your drink.
The steps would be:
1) Drink > 140, PCM solid
2) energy flows drink -> PCM, drink cools toward 140, PCM liquifies gradually
Then two possibilities:
3a) drink cools to 140-epsilon before PCM liquifies fully
4a) PCM gives energy to drink in dynamic equilibrium, while also losing energy to environment, solidifying
5a) PCM is entirely solid at 140
6a) PCM drops below 140. drink gives energy to PCM and PCM to environment. drink -> PCM thermal conductivity is presumably much higher than PCM -> env, so drink and PCM remain at same temp
OR
3b) PCM liquifies fully before drink hits 140-epsilon
4b) drink and PCM stay at thermal equilibrium (see 6a) while cooling toward 140. energy flows drink -> PCM and PCM -> environment. The former is faster, so the PCM continues liquifying
5b) PCM is entirely liquid at 140. Due to thermal equilibrium, drink is also at 140.
6b) drink stays at 140 while PCM solidifies
7b) see 5a
8b) see 6a
grep for technogeek [here](https://joeveo.com/pages/the-temperfect-mug)
It was thought for some time that they needed be turned to heat, but that's actually untrue. Using quantum gates, it is possible to do an arbitrary classical computation and recycle the anciliary bits.
Anyways, I didn't understand the acronyms so I decided to feed it to GPT and it definitely made it easier to understand:
Google is using a formula to determine which employees will be laid off (known as RIF: Reduction in Force)
The formula takes into account various factors such as location of labor (with US Premium Plus areas being more heavily impacted), tenure and performance in the current level, "runway" of compensation (the difference between base salary and maximum potential salary), and promo velocity (how quickly the employee has been promoted within the company)
This formula calculates a "number" for each employee based on these factors
Each Product Area Vice President (PA VP) is given a percentage of employees they must lay off
Employees with a score below a certain threshold, determined by the formula, will be laid off
And Google is in fact using AI almost everywhere in production already. You have some sort of AI in almost every product. Also language models are everywhere, e.g. just prediction of typing on your phone, or in GMail, in speech recognition, and many other places. I think they just do not use the biggest models for those things but some more efficient models, which can partly even run offline on your device (e.g. for the typing prediction).
Also in Google search, they use lots of AI, also neural networks.
It's just that for LaMDA specifically, they don't have a good product yet.
..........
> The formula looks at the variables below, and then spits out a "number" for every Googler. Each PA VP gets a % to cut, and as such there is a threshold. Anyone below that threshold gets RIF'd.
Variables are:
1) Location of labor. US Premium Plus was largely impacted versus cheaper areas. 2) Tenure and performance in level. 3) "Runway" of comp. (e.g. base salary vs MRP. eg. .8 of MRP Googlers have a long runway, vs 1.x of MRP Googlers are basically top of band, and 'tenured' with no runway except promo 4) Promo velocity
..........
Taken from https://www.teamblind.com/post/THE-DEFINITIVE-GOOGLE-LAYOFF-...
Disclaimer: Googler, but no particular internal-only information backing my impression of the above
I have wanted to try medicine to see if it helps me at all, but I've never been able to do so. My GP was willing to perscribe me something, but decided my BP was too high and that was that.
There are definitely anxiety issues at play as well, but I don't know to what degree.