Readit NewsBut the chronometers are will sync with each other if you don't store them apart, which would result correlated noise that an average won't fix.
https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/naming.html#casin...
Elo gains for engines tend to come from better evaluation, better pruning, and better search heuristics. That's not to say that longer search time or a stronger CPU doesn't help, it just doesn't magically make a weak engine into a strong engine.
> If you find that you're depending on a junk value in a way that's incompatible with what you wanted to prove
This is the part I'm struggling with. How would you actually know/realise that you were doing this? It seems like "the mathlib way" you describe is choosing to rely on programmer discipline for something that could be enforced automatically.
My fear is that relying on the junk values of functions (values where their "proper" partial counterparts are not defined) is somehow unsound (could lead to proving something untrue). But perhaps my intuition is off here? If so, I think the specific junk values chosen must not matter at all -- e.g., having sqrt return 42 for negative x values should work just as well, am I right?
If you have the expression 1+2*3 you have three elements with two operands. You need to choose a rule to pick one of them first.
In mathematics, the rule is "*/ then +-" and then from left to right. This means that usually first you do 2*3, then 1+.
But what if you do want to make 1+2 first?
There is another alternative, parenthesis. Those mean "do the thing inside first" so (1+2)*3 changes the precedence and now you do 1+2 first, then *3
The post is asking: with parenthesis you can increase the precedence of operations. What if you could decrease it?
Let's use «» as another operand (the blog uses parenthesis, but that makes it really confusing) this operand means "do the thing inside last". So the expression 1+«2*3» means "do 1+ first, then 2*3.
The issue is...this doesn't make sense, what the blog is really saying is to reduce the precedence of operators. Think the expression 1+2«*»3 or 1+2(*)3 and now the rule is "the parenthesized operators have one precedence less" so 1+2(*)3=(1+2)*3
Reminds me of the '$' operator in Haskell - it lowers the precedence of function application, basically being an opening parenthesis that's implicitly closed at the end of the line.
Just a pure question: Is Rust allocator global? (Will all heap allocations use the same allocator?)
The distinction between is one I've mentally adopted in other languages like Python as well. For personal projects I like to use single quotes for 'symbols' and double quotes for "strings", e.g.:
add_label(text="Hello World!", align='center')
$ telnet devnull-as-a-service.com 9
Trying 2001:19f0:6c01:497:5400:ff:fe69:8cbf...
Connection failed: Connection refused
Trying 45.76.95.197...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused